• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why are there so many atheists on a Christian site?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

No, I would not say that. I would say that evil poses a problem for the claim that God is both omnipotent and omnibenevolent. This is not an argument against theism per se, but against a particular concept of God.


It's problematic for what Christians claim about God - that he is almighty and all good. In short, it's problematic for the popular Christian characterisation of God.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

You're equivocating. The claim you purport to be testing is that "Atheists claim there is no God." Yet you are actually testing a claim about the existence of an all-powerful, all-loving God. By the end of this paragraph then, the meaning has shifted from "no God" to "no all-powerful, all-loving God." Is this sleight of hand deliberate?
 
Upvote 0

Eyes wide Open

Love and peace is the ONLY foundation-to build....
Dec 13, 2011
977
136
Australia
✟42,410.00
Gender
Male
Faith

Because atheists like to crash the party....filling the fruit punch with all that hard stuff, lol, leading them Christians astray!!! I'm not an atheist but I joined to better understand what makes folk tick, its been interesting, and the atheist POV has been invaluable, so I'll raise my glass of the hard stuff, cheers.
 
Upvote 0

Cearbhall

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2013
15,118
5,744
United States
✟129,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
On this first experiential world created by God, atheist claim there is no God. That puts them at odds with reality
It puts us as odds with your religion, not science or the type of reality that is accepted by all people, and I'm perfectly content with that.
ultimatly unreal for there is no salvageable soul growing within them.
Huh? Don't most Christians believe that atheists can be "saved?" Lost sheep, and all that.
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
62
✟107,801.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It puts us as odds with your religion, not science or the type of reality that is accepted by all people, and I'm perfectly content with that.

Huh? Don't most Christians believe that atheists can be "saved?" Lost sheep, and all that.

Science isn't a God, it's mind discerning, correlating and interpreting the facts of the material world. Science doesn't carry man beyond the grave.

Sure, an atheist can be born of the spirit and continue on, but for one who completely embraces sin (disloyalty to deity) there is no salvageable soul growth within (the soul being the immortal spiritual byproduct of cooperating with the will of the Father). To completely embrace godlessness is to embrace the doctrines of death. The embrace of ultimate meaningless of life beyond the grave is in fact validated by cessation of existence, that is the choice of the candidate.
 
Upvote 0

MissVeronica

Newbie
Mar 2, 2014
24
2
✟22,662.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single

I think it's good that Atheist are on here, remember healthy people don't need doctors. Firstly, I was once a non believer and no one could tell me any different. That's through ignorance and pride and the idea that I was backing down. However, one thing to know is, when we walk on the street and we see a beautiful painting, WE KNOW IT WAS PAINTED BY A PAINTER. but we cannot see the painter. So we know God exist because he gave us creation. Who don't want to believe is because Satan has blinded the mind of unbelievers. God doesn't care who believes or not he is still God. Simple, most Atheist are atheist because of ignorance and probably because no one has really sat down and explained or because they haven't tried to find out for Themself. So I think they should stay. They owe it to themself. Look at the difference most atheist are angry... They are judge mental, they are rude they are hostile. Yet no where in the bible does it say we should be like this. So personally I would choose to be a christian.
 
Upvote 0

MissVeronica

Newbie
Mar 2, 2014
24
2
✟22,662.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single

Love this .. There is either a god or there is not.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I think it's good that Atheist are on here, remember healthy people don't need doctors.

Why do some believers feel the need to pathologise nonbelief?


We can say that the painting was probably made by a painter because we are familiar with the process by which paintings are created. By contrast, we have little understanding of the process by which universes are created.

Simple, most Atheist are atheist because of ignorance and probably because no one has really sat down and explained or because they haven't tried to find out for Themself.

Ignorance of what specifically?

So I think they should stay. They owe it to themself. Look at the difference most atheist are angry... They are judge mental, they are rude they are hostile.

I wonder why someone would be aggravated by the suggestion that they are "unhealthy" and in need of a "doctor" just because they do not share your creed? Hmmm...
 
Upvote 0

True Scotsman

Objectivist
Jul 26, 2014
962
78
✟24,057.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

I'll tell you one thing. I spend time over at thethinkingatheist.com and the theists who come there are usually very rude and condescending and also very, very ignorant. They bring the same old tired arguments and generally make a bad job of it.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Science isn't a God, it's mind discerning, correlating and interpreting the facts of the material world.

That's true.

Science doesn't carry man beyond the grave.

Not......yet.

It is the only hope that anyone has. Counting on a non-existent God is a fool's hope.

The embrace of ultimate meaningless of life beyond the grave is

...not any inconvenience to the dead, or necessarily to those still alive.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Reactions: muichimotsu
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
However, one thing to know is, when we walk on the street and we see a beautiful painting, WE KNOW IT WAS PAINTED BY A PAINTER.

By definition. But is this a painting?



Or this?



Both are explainable through natural processes, with no intelligent "painter".

Who don't want to believe is because Satan has blinded the mind of unbelievers.

"Blinded" them with reason and good scientific judgment. "Blinded" them with sight.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟553,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Why do some believers feel the need to pathologise nonbelief?

Since there's no actual arguments for faith, I find that believers often attribute personal failings to people who disagree with them. Could be a way to rationalize to themselves that their guessing is correct while everyone else who uses the exact same method to come to a different answer must be incorrect.
 
Reactions: muichimotsu
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Who don't want to believe is because Satan has blinded the mind of unbelievers.

I always enjoy this particular attempt by certain theists to protect their own beliefs.

Anyone who doesn't believe as I do, is blinded by satan. It's like hitting the easy button, to provide a bit of temporary comfort.
 
Reactions: Paulos23
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
62
✟107,801.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I always enjoy this particular attempt by certain theists to protect their own beliefs.

Anyone who doesn't believe as I do, is blinded by satan. It's like hitting the easy button, to provide a bit of temporary comfort.

The man enjoys picking on religious people.
 
Upvote 0

TillICollapse

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2013
3,416
278
✟21,582.00
Gender
Male
Marital Status
Single
I think what may get overlooked, is that in some ways it's only natural for a believer to view others as having personally failed to not come to the same conclusions they have come to, or believe the same way they believe, because viewing themselves as personal failures is often a key component to their own belief system ... i.e. "I'm a sinner in need of transformation and saving."

IOW, for many there comes a point where they view themselves as having failed life/God/perfection/etc, and then at a later point they found the remedy. If you haven't found the same remedy ... then in many ways it's a "logical" step to make: you are a failure just like they were, you just don't realize it yet or are in denial. This applies not just to unbelievers, but believers who believe differently as well.

The idea that another person may not view themselves as having failed God/life/themselves/etc doesn't really compute. Sure nobody is perfect, but that's not the same as acknowledging you were a sinner that was in rebellion against God, etc. So for someone else to not claim the same types of things about themselves doesn't add up ... there is no frame of reference for such a person, so you end up falling into other categories in their minds: you are in denial, or you simply haven't realized the state you are in yet. The only frame of reference that comes close to such a person who wouldn't view themselves as having personally failed in such ways ... is "God". And since you aren't "God" lol ...
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
62
✟107,801.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Excuse me for pointing out the obvious; those folks who feel they have to label others as being guided by Satan, who disagree with them.

It is what it is.

And I tell them Satan is gone, he was defeated, that only his meme is in circulation, so they tell me Satan has blinded me as well.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
And I tell them Satan is gone, he was defeated, that only his meme is in circulation, so they tell me Satan has blinded me as well.

Ok, keep telling them that and I will keep pointing out they need to label those who disagree with them, as being guided by satan.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,676
29,508
LA
✟659,453.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Who sounds more reasonable?

The person who says "I don't know." Or the person who says "I know for a fact that this is true but I have absolutely no way to prove it to you and if you don't believe me, then you are blinded by an evil, invisible entity who is trying to confuse you."?
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,407
62
✟107,801.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married

Well, if they don't know then saying they don't really know is perfectly reasonable. And if there was and invisible entity buttressing your unbelief then it would be reasonable to sagest such.

And sometimes the nonbeliever appeals to reason for comfort in a vary strange material existence.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.