Why are there no cows in the Devonian?

[bhsmte]

True or not is on the content.
Correct or not is on the logic.

Wish you understand the difference.

Tell me what "logically correct" would look like, for something that is beyond human understanding and wisdom?

 

[PsychoSarah]

True or not is on the content.
Correct or not is on the logic.

Wish you understand the difference.

Wish you understood your own religion, which you stated no one can, because it is beyond human understanding. Which means even attempting to interpret the bible or read it is pointless, because all that is important about is apparently beyond human understanding, and we are all human.

 

[juvenissun]

Great. We should also teach Hindu creationism with their belief that the earth was created by Brahma some several billion years ago.

We'll teach the Native American creation stories as well. We'll have to narrow it down to just a couple to fit it in the time allowed. I'm partial to the Iroquois story. How about you?

We'll also teach the Shinto creation story. It is really interesting.

You surely can't refuse to teach all of the creation stories, after all, they all provide contrast.

I said this before. If the school is in India, certain the Hinduism should be introduced in their science books.

 

[HitchSlap]

I am less than half your age, and even I can see at a glance the flaw in that logic. In fact, there is an actual name for that kind of flawed reasoning pattern, hold on, I will look up its name.

Yep, I forget the actual fallacy, but I remember this from my Logic 101 class.

 

[Queller]

Still no one giving any data whatsoever to support the non existent Geological Column and its subsequently non existent "ages" such as Devonian.

And yet when I gave you evidence you didn't bother to read it and took your ball and went home.

Very telling.

 

[juvenissun]

Wish you understood your own religion, which you stated no one can, because it is beyond human understanding. Which means even attempting to interpret the bible or read it is pointless, because all that is important about is apparently beyond human understanding, and we are all human.

Of course we can understand it. I said we can not write it.

 

[HitchSlap]

Of course we can understand it. I said we can not write it.

Speak for yourself, chief, I can write plenty.

 

[bhsmte]

There are so many contradictions in this thread, it is starting to read like the bible.

 

[Queller]

Ineffective and awkward argument.
Who are you to tell me to do that?

In other words "No, I won't do that as that would show my entire argument to be false. I insist on using my own definitions."

 

[PsychoSarah]

Of course we can understand it. I said we can not write it.

Then what of its authors? Saying they aren't human?

 

[Queller]

Who said I do? I am defending it.

How can you defend it if you don't understand it? That would be like me trying to defend quantum entanglement theory.

 

[juvenissun]

Tell me what "logically correct" would look like, for something that is beyond human understanding and wisdom?

All right. Here is an example:

The earth does not have to be made after the sun.

 

[PsychoSarah]

How can you defend it if you don't understand it? That would be like me trying to defend quantum entanglement theory.

Or dark energy, to an extent. What is the current stance on that again? Oh right, they aren't sure what it is, or 100% if it exists. Sounds like a decent comparison.

 

[juvenissun]

How can you defend it if you don't understand it? That would be like me trying to defend quantum entanglement theory.

Wisdom.

Do you know what that is?

 

[PsychoSarah]

All right. Here is an example:

The earth does not have to be made after the sun.

I can understand the words, so not beyond human understanding.

 

[HitchSlap]

Wisdom.

Do you know what that is?

Yes. Would you like some?

 

[juvenissun]

Speak for yourself, chief, I can write plenty.

You certainly can NOT write Genesis 1.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Yes. Would you like some?

Sadly, it is not something that can be given to those who do not wish to have it.

 

[PsychoSarah]

You certainly can NOT write Genesis 1.

Plenty of monks did when they made copies of it.

 

[juvenissun]

Yes. Would you like some?

I like to have a lot of it.