Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Every one of your statements above use qualifiers. There are no qualifiers in Genesis. There is also no creation of fish on Day 6. Where do you get that from?every student (in the trip),
every student (in the class),
every fish (created in Day 5),
every fish (created in Day 6),
How about that? Where is the problem?
Ineffective and awkward argument.
Who are you to tell me to do that?
That means you don't understand it either.
Which is why creationism cannot be equated with science.This argument won't work. Creationism includes science and is beyond science and the idea of falsification does not apply. It can not be falsified.
Who said I do? I am defending it.
Every one of your statements above use qualifiers. There are no qualifiers in Genesis. There is also no creation of fish on Day 6. Where do you get that from?
You are defending something you don't understand. If you don't understand it, then how can you know it is true? It is like speaking in a language you never learned, and translating it without ever considering that your uninformed translation might be incorrect.
Which is why creationism cannot be equated with science.
It does not have to be true. And I don't have to understand it. If it is logically correct, then I am successful.
Certainly not me.
Great. We should also teach Hindu creationism with their belief that the earth was created by Brahma some several billion years ago.Yes. At least provided it as a contrast. It is absolutely worthwhile for an one-hour class. It tells students that science has its limitation.
ANYONE: Don't be fooled by one of the posts above that purports to be showing evidenced for the Geologic Column. Simply Google "Evidence for Geologic Column" and there you will see things like "theoretical...presumed...." etc. Try to find a picture of one. You never will because the GC and its Cambrian, Devonian, Jurassic etc. etc. is all b.s designed to make your believe the pseudo religion of evolution. Don't take my word for it or anyone else's. Just Google.
Bye for good.
ANYONE: Don't be fooled by one of the posts above that purports to be showing evidenced for the Geologic Column. Simply Google "Evidence for Geologic Column" and there you will see things like "theoretical...presumed...." etc. Try to find a picture of one. You never will because the GC and its Cambrian, Devonian, Jurassic etc. etc. is all b.s designed to make your believe the pseudo religion of evolution. Don't take my word for it or anyone else's. Just Google.
Bye for good.
How can something be logically correct, when it is above human wisdom to understand?
What about what can not be understood, is logically correct, exactly?
Here's a logic bomb for ya'.
God is Love
Love is Blind
Ray Charles is Blind
Therefore, Ray Charles is God.
Somehow I don't think you read that entire article (and comprehended it) in 15 minutes.ANYONE: Don't be fooled by one of the posts above that purports to be showing evidenced for the Geologic Column. Simply Google "Evidence for Geologic Column" and there you will see things like "theoretical...presumed...." etc. Try to find a picture of one. You never will because the GC and its Cambrian, Devonian, Jurassic etc. etc. is all b.s designed to make your believe the pseudo religion of evolution. Don't take my word for it or anyone else's. Just Google.
Don't let the door hit you on your way out.Bye for good.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?