• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why are so many against reformed Theology…

Status
Not open for further replies.

1Reformedman

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2019
454
152
58
St. Louis
✟4,261.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Also a "good" exegesis may be wrong. I can say with pretty much certainty, and I think you agree with this, that no one has the perfect understanding of scripture.
exegesis is a critical examination of the text IN CONTEXT where as eisegeting is based upon presuppositions and a lack of critical examination of the text wherein the verse is often taken out of context.
 
Upvote 0

zoidar

loves Jesus the Christ! ✝️
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2010
7,503
2,678
✟1,044,946.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
exegesis is a critical examination of the text IN CONTEXT where as eisegeting is based upon presuppositions and a lack of critical examination of the text wherein the verse is often taken out of context.

Thanks, I know.

 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
According to "Reformed Theology" it's all been pre-determined, and NOT predicated on our human actions (U). Some will live (L,I,P), and SOME (L - maybe most) will burn, and NOBODY has any choice in the matter.
Can you prove your statement?
 
Upvote 0

1Reformedman

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2019
454
152
58
St. Louis
✟4,261.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It may be that what has been explained here will help other readers who have wondered about Reformed theology, even if not every last person is in that category.
Reformed theology is simply an exegetical examination of the word of God rather than an eisegetical examination thereof. You have shown in your posts, that I have thus far read, you really dont have a good grasp on what RT is.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Albion
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Just in general to all. It’s best if you want to argue against the OP to actually use Reformed writings.

The best out there which compares and contrasts Arminianism and Reformed doctrines is the Synod of Dort.



Canons of Dort
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
SO then the Calvinise "U" is inaccurate. and God's decision to "Elect" an individual is CONDITIONAL on considerations that God foresees.
Can you argue this with Scriptures?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Consequently then, it'a an ARBITRARY decision on God's part to Save this one, and Condemn that one. You can't have it both ways.

So which is it??
Why did God create all things? Was that arbitrary or was that according to His will and purpose?
 
Upvote 0

1Reformedman

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2019
454
152
58
St. Louis
✟4,261.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can you prove your statement?
You can prove it to yourself by reading the doctrines of Grace. What he described is pretty much spot on. God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world began. He did so according to the whole counsel of HIS WILL not the will of man. So if man's will plays no part in it then their "choice" is irrelevant. Do we choose? Yes, but not like many think. Our will is in bondage to the old nature until God gives us the new nature. Once that happens our will is in bondage to God and we will choose Christ affirmatively at that point because our nature is different. While in bondage to the old nature we will always reject the call to repentance, we will always reject Jesus, because we have not been convicted of our sin, our spiritual ears and eyes are still deaf and blind, the enmity is still between us and God. Only believers have Peace with God. I think what the other poster was saying when he said NOBODY has a choice is that he's talking about a "free will" choice which would be correct because the will is never truly free and as such, there is no such thing as free will choice. Even determinism debunks free will let alone God's choice of his elect according to his will and not man's.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not if the "Reformed Systematic" is correct. The decision to Save, or Condemn was already set in stone before the creation (supralapsarianism), OR sometime after the fall (infralapsarianism).

What Dr. Kennedy thinks or doesn't think isn't "Gods Word" - just HIS OPINION, so no help there. ALL God's CHilluns Gots "Opinions".
Well Ephesians 1 says from before the foundations of the earth.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1Reformedman
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You can prove it to yourself by reading the doctrines of Grace. What he described is pretty much spot on. God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world began. He did so according to the whole counsel of HIS WILL not the will of man. So if man's will plays no part in it then their "choice" is irrelevant. Do we choose? Yes, but not like many think. Our will is in bondage to the old nature until God gives us the new nature. Once that happens our will is in bondage to God and we will choose Christ affirmatively at that point because our nature is different. While in bondage to the old nature we will always reject the call to repentance, we will always reject Jesus, because we have not been convicted of our sin, our spiritual ears and eyes are still deaf and blind, the enmity is still between us and God. Only believers have Peace with God. I think what the other poster was saying when he said NOBODY has a choice is that he's talking about a "free will" choice which would be correct because the will is never truly free and as such, there is no such thing as free will choice. Even determinism debunks free will let alone God's choice of his elect according to his will and not man's.
This is the second post (first one to @Albion) where you misread the post. I was responding to one who is opposed to the doctrines of Grace and raised up his own straw man argument.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Reformed theology is simply an exegetical examination of the word of God rather than an eisegetical examination thereof. You have shown in your posts, that I have thus far read, you really dont have a good grasp on what RT is.
It might help to keep in mind that a stilted explanation like that one is likely to help no one understand Reformed theology, specifically as it concerns Predestination. But I genuinely do think that a lot of very clear and very good answers have been given by a range of people on this thread, such that anyone who is wondering but has an open mind should profit from reading those posts. I have learned that many more people read these things than enter into a discussion about them.

As for myself, I said before that my interest is in making clear, if possible, what Reformed teaching is, not that I am intent upon converting any reader to it. That's because it am convinced that the reason people say the Reformed beliefs concerning TULIP are wrong is because they don't understand what they are all about. If you notice, most of the negative posts on this thread either misuse some of the terminology or else flat-out state that the writers do not want to be dissuaded from the views they picked up somewhere else.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In some cases it's because they see some error in the way it is usually presented.

In some cases it is because they have misunderstood what it teaches when rightly presented.
Or they just visit the latest You Tube theologian who thinks they are apologists. I get a lot of You Tube links to supposed pastors and Bible teachers I never heard of and it only takes a few minutes to figure out they are mimicking just another nobody on the internet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: His student
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yup - so much for "Systematics" - Reformed or otherwise. They're NOT The Word of God. your commentary cite maybe is: Rom 9:16 "So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy".
You have a your own systematic and probably don’t know it.

Or do you believe that there is no Biblical Doctrine presented in Holy Scriptures?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
For myself it basically renders the gospel gutless and meaningless-putting the cart ahead of the of horse regarding election, perseverance, assurance- opposing the gospel regarding the role of man's will.
So man is the horse and God is the cart?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All Christiandom believe God is in charge. Reformed claim God meticulously controls everything in creation, down to the most base evil actions.
See the difference?
No that’s not true.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Albion
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,815
1,923
✟991,936.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Good Day, All

This Ligonier conference from 2015 in the QA session, attempts to answer this question.

.. “Once you understand the doctrines of grace, It’s like your breathing heavens air”





In Him,

Bill
Salvation is totally by grace with humans doing nothing: noble, honorable, deserving, worthy to obtain salvation, but that does not mean the person “dead” in sin (by Christ’s definition of “dead’ in His uses to describe the prodigal son Luke 15) cannot or did not “do” something. In the likeness of the prodigal son who did nothing “worthy, honorable or noble”, the sinner while in a dead state is brought to his senses by his own bad choices and makes an autonomous free will choice to either hang in there, be a good soldier of satan, pay the piper and take the punishment he fully deserves or wimp out, give up and surrender to his enemy while God is still his enemy, with just the willingness for selfish reasons to humbly accept pure undeserved charity, but he certainly is not changing sides at this time. By the sinner just willingness to humbly accept pure charity, God can thus shower the sinner with unbelievable huge gifts, including eternal life, so it is all God doing it. Could the prodigal son boast of anything great he did? How can the beggar correctly desiring pure sacrificial charity “boast” about being given charity?



There has been lots of discussion on election being “arbitrary” and even though the reformist does not “know” why God chooses one over the other they seem to be saying: “It is not arbitrary”, but if it is not “arbitrary” than there has to be a reason even if it God’s reason. So, if I have been elected for some Godly reason over others, I still would have a reason to boast. Some have said: “we do not know if we have been elected” so we can’t boast, but that would mean we cannot know if we have the indwelling Holy Spirit, which I can know?

If the autonomous free will choice all mature adults get to make is not there than there is no reason for our time on this messed up world. Given the free will objective to Love like God Loves, explains everything God did, is doing, allowed and is allowing to happen including: Christ going to the cross, satan roaming the earth, Adam and Eve sinning, tragedies of all kinds, hell, death and our being able to sin.

You have to go from a very logical reason to a totally illogical reason.
 
Upvote 0

1Reformedman

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2019
454
152
58
St. Louis
✟4,261.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is the second post (first one to @Albion) where you misread the post. I was responding to one who is opposed to the doctrines of Grace and raised up his own straw man argument.
Ok, so you are not opposed to the Doctrines of Grace. I stand corrected. My apologies.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, so you are not opposed to the Doctrines of Grace. I stand corrected. My apologies.
No problem bro. Been on these threads a lot defending Biblical doctrines which they doctrines of Grace are. I was responding to the last portion of what the other posted posited. I should have highlighted it.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.