Besides what you see on oca.org and diocesan websites, you can sometimes find other commentary done by the people involved - say, videos of them speaking on the subject. For the most part, though, all the bishops (incl. +JONAH) are keeping fairly quiet. This lack of official information - and the lack of good semi-official information - is why I encourage people to wait until after the meetings in May to formulate an opinion (or "take sides" - we don't even know if there are "sides" to take yet) because there's no good information. We don't know the exact nature of the conflict, what's at stake in the conflict, who is on each "side" of the conflict if there are even any "sides". We do have a strong suggestion that what is at stake is the potential removal of the Metropolitan from office if it comes to that, but we don't really know the grounds, the conditions that would precipitate this action, who is in favor, etc, and most of what you would see is speculation and hearsay. It is not helpful to have a strong opinion on those grounds. There's plenty of time afterward to decide if somebody did a hatchet job.
Then again, people in some places are still wondering even now about whether we did a hatchet job on Joey, Bobby, and Frankie (the people on a website I won't name have certainly mentioned it (and if you don't know who they are, what are you doing having an opinion about it?)). Perhaps we did? But I think it's too late to be overly concerned about that ancient history.
