Why Abortion is Immoral

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
14,036
3,586
✟326,735.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
You've got that backwards, but I'll give you the benefit of doubt that you meant not after. It doesn't come down to minutes, that's why I said around.
Couldn't find where I had it backwards, but either way, when does it come down to, that a fetus becomes human? Or does it even matter? I mean, to me that's a very important point in a person's life-when they're awarded full protection of the law to defend their life, and when they're not consider worthy of a right to life. Shouldn't we need to know exactly when that occurs?
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

OK . . . lets take my daughter for an example, she had two miscarriages before she took herself to complete bed rest for her third pregnancy, and in that manner, managed to have my grandchild.

If my daughter had not gone to complete bed rest but had allowed herself normal activities, and as a result the third pregnancy had ended in miscarriage . . . . would she be guilty of murder? ( ) yes ( ) no
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
14,036
3,586
✟326,735.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Ok, so we should be confortable with an arbitrary determination on the the point in time a fetus becomes a person? It doesn't matter if we're mistaken?
 
Upvote 0

SteveB28

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2015
4,032
2,426
95
✟21,415.00
Faith
Atheist
So, at what point, then, does the unborn become worthy of protection-of the right to life? Or is the right to life for a human, since it's reportedly just based on man-made morality anyway, not really so important to begin with?

My own view leads towards sentience, sapience and survival independent of the mother. Beyond 20-24 weeks gestation.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Ok, so we should be confortable with an arbitrary determination on the the point in time a fetus becomes a person? It doesn't matter if we're mistaken?

One can be assured that the nervous system does not support personhood in the first two trimesters.
 
Upvote 0

Job8

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2014
4,639
1,801
✟21,583.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Miscarriage and abortion are two different things. Please note:
 
Upvote 0

SteveB28

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2015
4,032
2,426
95
✟21,415.00
Faith
Atheist
Miscarriage and abortion are two different things. Please note:

No, his question highlights the hypocrisy perfectly. His daughter could have taken an action to heighten the probability of a spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage. Now watch the 'morally superior' scuttle for cover!
 
Upvote 0

Beechwell

Glücksdrache
Sep 2, 2009
768
23
Göttingen
✟8,677.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
You do realize though, that the DNA by itself is basically inert though, so you?
It is just a blueprint to create other specific proteins.
I guess I just don't understand the way you think about DNA or 'human'. To me your line of reasoning is like saying a recipe for a cake is already a cake.

Also, theoretically a new human being could grow from the female egg alone, without the sperm DNA. Some animals can reproduce like that. How would you characterise such a being?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


Even out of our mother's womb we are still half baked.
 
Reactions: jenny1972
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Beechwell

Glücksdrache
Sep 2, 2009
768
23
Göttingen
✟8,677.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Even out of our mother's womb we are still half baked.
True, but by then we already have a metabolism, a human physique and some Brain activity. There is at least the possibility that we are in since sense 'someone'.
It is true that we can't pinpoint any specific time when a fetus /baby becomes ' someone, probably because there is no such special moment. Nature usually doesn't deal in clear distinguishable states, it is only or human minds that try to find then.
But it is clear from what we know about fetal development that our self begins somewhere between the 20th week of gestation and since months after birth.
That is why I find no moral is issues with abortion prior to week 20 of gestation .
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Miscarriage and abortion are two different things. Please note:

So if I run a factory that releases a chemical into the environment that causes spontaneous abortion rates to go up by 10 percent I have created no harm in the community, right?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

What's interesting is the Gene Roddenberry atheist support, in concept, for the prime directive.

If a planet had some microbe the Starfleet crew avoided in that life's natural development.

I know science fiction analogy however a reflection of the 60s era of do no harm to any life.

My original point well above in the thread was just that. We should not stop what has started. Such is harm to any life. Who are we to judge early human life? Are we God? No.

If one does not ascribe to theism then the question is do we end what nature began or kick against fate?
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So if I run a factory that releases a chemical into the environment that causes spontaneous abortion rates to go up by 10 percent I have created no harm in the community, right?

Wrong.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
60
✟169,357.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Well then maybe the word "killed" wasn't being use correctly. And the word I used was viable, which does not mean becoming human. Finally, if the life is not one you are carrying in your womb, then no, you don't need to know exactly when that occurs.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh, then abortion and miscarriages are not such separate catagories after all.


Intent is everything. Such was the Law as well. If a man aaccidentally killed another while chopping wood, it was not the same as if he intentionally did such.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,857
✟256,002.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Intent is everything. Such was the Law as well. If a man aaccidentally killed another while chopping wood, it was not the same as if he intentionally did such.

So if I run this chemical factory and miscarriages increase by a factor of 10 per cent all around that factory and that was never my intention then I can happily continue running my factory, and build another one to make even more money.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So if I run this chemical factory and miscarriages increase by a factor of 10 per cent all around that factory and that was never my intention then I can happily continue running my factory, and build another one to make even more money.

According to what is revealed of the Mind of God, no. There was always restitution for sin that was unintentional. The exceptions always included some harm from a violent act. That then became eye for eye, tooth for tooth, life for life.

Applying the matter to your chemical factory...If you continued on in producing the chemicals knowing you were causing harm, you would be liable for taking another life both before the civil court and the Throne of God.

I may have missed the root of your vignette of the chemical factory. So hope we are not talking past each other.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh, then abortion and miscarriages are not such separate catagories after all.

What's the intent?

So my answer is no, abortion and miscarriages are not the same category. Intent or premeditated purpose is to be considered.
 
Upvote 0