This assumes that this took everyone by surprise, but it should not have. Biden was showing signs of decline long before the primaries, but his administration hid it. They told everyone he was fine. The media carried their water. His supporters looked the other way.
And yet, somehow, the story still managed to get out. But no one knew the details for sure.
Biden's debate performance didn't surprise me one bit. It wasn't something that should have required adapting to if people had been honest about his decline before the primaries began. Then there would have been open primaries and the Democratic voters could have chosen their candidate through a fair and honest process.
If ifs and buts were candies and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.
Here's the thing: Biden ran for reelection. Whether or not he should have is immaterial. His age was known, but rumors of his cognitive state circulated even before the primaries. No details were confirmed, but still, democrats took all that information in, and voted for him anyway.
Then, things changed. Biden may have felt he could do another four years, and there may have been people around him who also felt he could do it. But some didn't, and eventually, Biden himself came to the decision that he could no longer see himself serving another four years, so he decided against running for reelection.
Was this an ideal situation? No. But it's what happened. So we do what we always do when stuff happens: we adapt and deal with it.
If you, who are not a democrat, don't approve of how democrats run their party, and decide on who their nominee is, that's your business. The Democratic Party doesn't have to care what you think, nor do registered democrats. But feel free to present your opinion anyway.
-- A2SG, but still feel free to present your own nominee....there's a space to write that person in on the ballot....