Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Absolutely.
They have huge scale models of the moon with camera tracks beside them. Of course it is staged.
Look at the movies that Hollywood can produce for a couple of million dollars and then compare the budget for NASA.
Why would you need a scale model of the moon unless you were going to film it to look like you were there?
Yes, the photos you see now are CGI. That means Computer Generated Images.... NASA even admits it. They even admit that all the photos of the earth are CGI because "they have to be".
The pictures of the earth from space have obvious evidence of photo shop's cloning tool as numerous cloud formations are copied and pasted all over the "globe".
HEY, if it took a Saturn V rocket, many stories high, to get out of earths orbit... why is it that the Lunar Module had no rocket engines at all to blast off from the moon and break out of gravity that is not non existent and, in fact, 1/6 of the strength of earth's gravity... would they not need a rocket engine at least 1/6 the size of the Saturn V... I know, I know the Lunar module was less weight compared to the command module, the lunar module and the rest of the equipment in nose of the Saturn V. BUT not that much smaller... Not enough to get off the moon with absolutely no rocket engines comparable to even 1/64 of the Saturn V... But, you can do anything with movie experts under the budget of NASA.
Not to mention that the camera that filmed... that's "filmed" the lunar module blasting off of the moon shows a flash of an explosion then.......nothing else. No engine blast, no propulsion hardware... just the living portion of the lunar module.
Then, the cherry on the top is the fact that this camera, with no operator, perfectly pans upward as the lunar module rises off the moon.
A bonus is how they got these filmed images of them leaving the moon, from a camera with film, from the camera to develop it and show it here on earth.
I have no doubt that they did not ever go to the moon.
On Aug. 7, 1972, in the heart of the Apollo era, an enormous solar flare exploded from the sun’s atmosphere. Along with a gigantic burst of light in nearly all wavelengths, this event accelerated a wave of energetic particles. Mostly protons, with a few electrons and heavier elements mixed in, this wash of quick-moving particles would have been dangerous to anyone outside Earth’s protective magnetic bubble. Luckily, the Apollo 16 crew had returned to Earth just five months earlier, narrowly escaping this powerful event.
How to Protect Astronauts from Space Radiation on Mars
The Russians knew.... Why do you think they never did anything more than sputnik....?
Let me ask.... have you looked into it or are you just trying to find reasons to find why it is not a lie instead of looking for evidence that it is impossible
The order of magnitude. We are all radiated all the time, right here on Earth. It's about how much, precisely.
Apollo Rocketed Through the Van Allen Belts
Here is the question again:I guess you believe in lots of other conspiracy stories too, about other events!
Now.... this statement makes me scratch my head...I guess you believe in lots of other conspiracy stories too, about other events!
Absolutely.
They have huge scale models of the moon with camera tracks beside them. Of course it is staged.
Look at the movies that Hollywood can produce for a couple of million dollars and then compare the budget for NASA.
Why would you need a scale model of the moon unless you were going to film it to look like you were there?
Yes, the photos you see now are CGI. That means Computer Generated Images.... NASA even admits it. They even admit that all the photos of the earth are CGI because "they have to be".
The pictures of the earth from space have obvious evidence of photo shop's cloning tool as numerous cloud formations are copied and pasted all over the "globe".
HEY, if it took a Saturn V rocket, many stories high, to get out of earths orbit... why is it that the Lunar Module had no rocket engines at all to blast off from the moon and break out of gravity that is not non existent and, in fact, 1/6 of the strength of earth's gravity... would they not need a rocket engine at least 1/6 the size of the Saturn V... I know, I know the Lunar module was less weight compared to the command module, the lunar module and the rest of the equipment in nose of the Saturn V. BUT not that much smaller... Not enough to get off the moon with absolutely no rocket engines comparable to even 1/64 of the Saturn V... But, you can do anything with movie experts under the budget of NASA.
Not to mention that the camera that filmed... that's "filmed" the lunar module blasting off of the moon shows a flash of an explosion then.......nothing else. No engine blast, no propulsion hardware... just the living portion of the lunar module.
Then, the cherry on the top is the fact that this camera, with no operator, perfectly pans upward as the lunar module rises off the moon.
A bonus is how they got these filmed images of them leaving the moon, from a camera with film, from the camera to develop it and show it here on earth.
I have no doubt that they did not ever go to the moon.
Exactly. However, one of the biggest obstacles to the Mars mission, supposedly, is that they must go through the Van Allen belts of radioactive particles and they do not have the ability to shield the space craft or the astronauts with the technology they have.
But, we are expected to believe that they did it in the 70's......? In a tin can?
YouTube I suspect.Who told you that the Van Allen belts are so lethal?
Tunneling will be a very important part of space colonization to be sure. Underground structures make a lot more sense long term than the shiny dome tent thingies.He owns a Boring company and a Solar one and one to do with brain research. The earth based challenges of solar power and public transit systems are also complementary to the kinds of technology development needed for Mars
The future of space exploration/mining is AI and robots not people. And I think earth is going to run out of resources before even tat becomes feasible.Tunneling will be a very important part of space colonization to be sure. Underground structures make a lot more sense long term than the shiny dome tent thingies.
I vote SpaceX making it there first. They've got the technology, the drive and most importantly, the celebrity billionaire fundraiser to pull it off.
It's going to be very interesting when a branch of humanity and their new home world are established and run by a corporation. Will SpaceX "own" Mars? Or try to? What happens when Disney tries to set up a colony?
Apollo involved very brief missions. And the IIS hits several limits -- 6 months in the ISS hits the lifetime radiation exposure limit, and that period of weightlessness also causes optic nerve damage.
My own gut feel is that the best way to test a Mars colony would be with a Moon colony. But even that would be hard.
Well no. They just think they can get the funds.
Tunneling will be a very important part of space colonization to be sure. Underground structures make a lot more sense long term than the shiny dome tent thingies.
I vote SpaceX making it there first. They've got the technology, the drive and most importantly, the celebrity billionaire fundraiser to pull it off.
It's going to be very interesting when a branch of humanity and their new home world are established and run by a corporation. Will SpaceX "own" Mars? Or try to? What happens when Disney tries to set up a colony?
The future of space exploration/mining is AI and robots not people. And I think earth is going to run out of resources before even tat becomes feasible.
I would have liked to see a moon colony too and it may still happen. The moon is an easier tourist destination. I do not think a Mars initiative and a moon one are mutually exclusive - especially regarding the rocket lift capability. But the money and interest seem to be with Mars right now. Also the moon and Mars bases are different kinds of challenge. If ,as I believe Musk has suggested ,the journey time is as low as 30 days and if the Mars bases are properly shielded or underground, radiation might not be such a massive barrier to success.
Peoples eyesight was damaged in zero gravity on ISS for reasons that are understood. But Mars has partial gravity (.38 g i think) so it is a different case. But still needs research.
Here, go to the 3:30 minute mark if you don't want to waste too much time. This is a NASA engineer stating that we cannot send humans up this far and must "solve this problem before we send people to this region of space".Who told you that the Van Allen belts are so lethal?
Oh, man... you say that like "YouTube" is a being, an entity.... sheesh... how long is it going to be before people realize that YouTube is for cat videos, crazy pranks, serious presentations, and everything else under the sun....YouTube I suspect.
Nobody or no robot or no satellite is going to space. The temperatures of space are extreme and will fry any electronics, and melt circuit boards..... Unless you know how your cell phone would last in an oven at 250 degrees Fahrenheit or function at minus 148 degrees Fahrenheit.The future of space exploration/mining is AI and robots not people. And I think earth is going to run out of resources before even tat becomes feasible.
Nobody or no robot or no satellite is going to space.
All those satellite dishes are a vast hoax, then...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?