- Jan 25, 2009
- 19,765
- 1,428
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Not really, seeing that it was an issue OFTEN debated within Judaism when it came to the subject of why it seemed that the women were allowed to keep their land instead of another man taking it. The issue of determining identity by males was not only in children - but connected to the larger culture of Patriarchical societies.That's comparing apples to oranges.
Didn't matter if he had sons - but that was the CENTRAL issue, as he had none and it was debated as to whether or not they could keep it as females/determine the line of succession.Their father died. They received the land because of patrilineal anyway. Who else was going to get that land
Upvote
0