Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Jesus is speaking metaphorically not literally.
I don't view Jesus as a farmer.
OK so in post #2 & 3 it spells out that which offends and that which is iniquity. All do iniquity in relation to what's described in posts #2 & 3. So all go to the lake of fire?
You know.. theres nothing wrong with talking about this. But for me "everlasting lake of fire".I have kids and to many of us are walking up to some "Father" picking up His kids His creation and tossing them in the fire..looking back telling this Father how much we love really love Him.
See this is what gets me. This world that knows Him not are unrighteous. Are against Him. Yet for God so loved the world <--do we see them like this 1st? They are HIS not mine. HIS creation. He made every one of them. He will never ever ever see them again. He made them. Even David.. said let not the wicked be written in your book with the righteous. To never see what you made again. Hard to for me to...
In 58 years.. He show'd me one time ..a very tiny of how He sees people. I had prayed to see people through His eyes all my life. 15 years later He show'd me. What I see.. felt was .. As I looked at people.. this was in LA Calf .. all the people... never saw believer or lost.. but He was crying so very very hard. For not one knew how much He loved them. And in that moment I knew I was only given the tiniest sliver of a glance of how a GOD sees His creation. I truly believe now.. no one knows how much this GOD loves us.
So to talk about a day in which I have no say what so ever other then "did you share ME?" "WHY did you say nothing about me" <--this is what I am working on. I don't get to write in look in HIS books. And I should be the one being toss out. ...again.. nothing wrong with talking about this.
All you have done is introduce a new law. Why did Christ have to come at all? Would he not have just told Moses the so called new law of commandments, and introduced that in the beginning. Christ did not replace the law. The bible says "I did not come to destroy the law, until heaven and earth pass away not one dot or tiddle will be removed from the law". We are still under the law. But Christ has taken the penalty for us failing to meet its requirements. You are close to what salvation is but you have missed the point. As Christians God's Holy Spirit motivates us to keep the law of commandments, as the bible says "the one who is born of God keeps himself from sin". But we are not saved by being sinless. As the bible says "If righteousness came by the law, Christ died in vain". Did you not know "we have been called to liberty, only don't use that as an excuse to sin". What is that "liberty" we have been called to? It is me being viewed as sinless in God's eyes, justified not by my works, not by the law, but by Christ alone. Yet do I sin, no, the Holy Spirit motivates me not to. But am I perfect? No. I need the cross.
All you have done is introduce a new law. Why did Christ have to come at all? Would he not have just told Moses the so called new law of commandments, and introduced that in the beginning. Christ did not replace the law. The bible says "I did not come to destroy the law, until heaven and earth pass away not one dot or tiddle will be removed from the law". We are still under the law. But Christ has taken the penalty for us failing to meet its requirements. You are close to what salvation is but you have missed the point. As Christians God's Holy Spirit motivates us to keep the law of commandments, as the bible says "the one who is born of God keeps himself from sin". But we are not saved by being sinless. As the bible says "If righteousness came by the law, Christ died in vain". Did you not know "we have been called to liberty, only don't use that as an excuse to sin". What is that "liberty" we have been called to? It is me being viewed as sinless in God's eyes, justified not by my works, not by the law, but by Christ alone. Yet do I sin, no, the Holy Spirit motivates me not to. But am I perfect? No. I need the cross.
Of course. His purpose is to be all in all. His Salvation is the a to z. He will have everyone come to repentance and a knowledge of the truth. What, you think it's a club?
Whomsoever enters the Lake of Fire rebellious emerges repentant Rev 20:9,15, 21:24-26, 22:2.
Does a microwave say to its manufacturer - 'I will not be recalled'? Or a car say to its mechanic 'I will not be repaired'? Is any malady too tough for the Great Physician? No, He even cures us from death and despair!
Why was Paul arguing negatively at times against the Law and or works?
Paul was arguing against the heresy of "Circumcision Salvationism" which stated that you had to be circumcised first in order to be saved. This also included following the Law of Moses. This heresy was addressed at the Jerusalem council:
- Acts of the Apostles 15:1 says, “And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.”
- Acts of the Apostles 15:5 says, But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.”
- Acts of the Apostles 15:24 says, “Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:”
The commands of Jesus and His followers is NOT the same as the Law of Moses. They are a different set of Laws or commands. Hebrews 7:12 says the Law has changed. This makes sense because we are under a New Covenant (or New Testament). A New Covenant suggests we are under New Commands. But there were certain unbelieving Jews who wanted Christians to go back to the Old Covenant Law to be saved and they did not want them to first trust in Jesus as their Savior. They wanted them to trust in circumcision as the foundation of their faith and not Christ. Therein lies the difference here. Paul was not speaking against the necessity of living holy and or bringing forth good works as a part of being in God's Kingdom. Hebrews 12:14 says that without holiness, no man shall see the Lord. James 2:17 says faith without works is dead. Paul says that we can deny God by a lack of works (Titus 1:16).
Dear Shrewd: It is a constant amazement the view our gracious and loving Father is among many in our ranks. We become like we think. The Great Physician heals broken beings of Adam. He does not patch them up, He transforms them from the inside out. He is the God of metamorphoo changing crawling creatures into spectacles of grandeur!
I do not disagree with you that we should keep Jesus commands, and I would go a step farther and say that we should also keep the law, at least the spirit of the law. For when the apostles said "all scripture is profitable for doctrine and reproof", the only scripture they had was the Law of Moses, and the wisdom and prophecy books of the Old Testament. Where I am fervently against you is in the fact that you seem to be denying the grace of God. The bible makes it clear in many places we are saved not by obeying the law, be it new or old, but rather by trusting in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. That is the work that we are called to primarily, to "believe in the one God sent [Jesus]".
Just pause for a moment. Lets consider the scripture again., I believe it is loaded with truth.
"You have been called to liberty, only don't use that liberty as an excuse for the flesh, but in love serve one another"
Paul makes it clear:
1) We are called by God to live in liberty from the yoke of bondage to the law of commandments. Let me make it clear the only scripture the apostles had was the law, it was their scripture. Jesus did not introduce new scripture, he referred to the law. All of the things he introduced we less stringent, not more so. As an example pardoning the woman caught in adultery. Allowing his disciples to glean grain on the sabbath, etc. The only new command that Jesus gave was "love one another as I have loved you".
2) So we are free from the yoke of bondage to the law of commandments, now you start screaming, no we are not, we must keep them all perfectly to be saved. But that is not what the bible teaches. It teaches salvation 100% by this liberty. Yet now look at the amendment to grace. "don't use the fact that you are free (sinless apart from the law) as an excuse to sin". The bible goes on to say, "should we continue to sin so that grace can abound?", the answer "by no means", yet Paul "does not make void the grace of God, for if righteousness is by the law Christ died in vain".
Although I am sure you will be in heaven by trying to live God's way, there are certain things God will never entrust you with, for you can not teach His word effectively to others until you acknowledge His grace.
I now that you are just trying to get people to live God's way, the way of his commandments. But you have the cart before the horse, the mercy of God's grace draws us to salvation, and his communion draws us toward sinlessness. But we will never be sinless. We still need daily strength from God to be empowered to perform His call.
Sure there are people in the church who as the bible says "turns the grace of God into lasciviousness", and you are right to condemn them for their willful sins. But return to grace, for you are not preaching the truth.
...we should also keep the law, at least the spirit of the law.
I do not disagree with you that we should keep Jesus commands,
You said:...the only scripture they had was the Law of Moses, and the wisdom and prophecy books of the Old Testament. 1) We are called by God to live in liberty from the yoke of bondage to the law of commandments. Let me make it clear the only scripture the apostles had was the law, it was their scripture. Jesus did not introduce new scripture, he referred to the law. All of the things he introduced we less stringent, not more so. As an example pardoning the woman caught in adultery. Allowing his disciples to glean grain on the sabbath, etc. The only new command that Jesus gave was "love one another as I have loved you".
You said:Where I am fervently against you is in the fact that you seem to be denying the grace of God. The bible makes it clear in many places we are saved not by obeying the law, be it new or old, but rather by trusting in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. That is the work that we are called to primarily, to "believe in the one God sent [Jesus]".
You said:Just pause for a moment. Lets consider the scripture again., I believe it is loaded with truth.
"You have been called to liberty, only don't use that liberty as an excuse for the flesh, but in love serve one another"
You said:now you start screaming, no we are not, we must keep them all perfectly to be saved. But that is not what the bible teaches.
All who offend and do iniquity in His Kingdom are cast into the Lake of Fire.
1 John 3:7 says that he that does righteousness is righteous.
We learn in Matthew 25:21 that the servant who was faithful over little was told to enter into the joy of their Lord and to be rewarded. In Matthew 25:30, the unprofitable servant was cast into outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Jesus says in Matthew 7 that we will know a tree by its fruit. Fruits are deeds.
Jesus says a good tree cannot bring forth bad fruit and a bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit. Jesus then talks about how some believers who do good works and who work iniquity (sin) are told to depart from Him (See Matthew 7:23). John 3:10 says,
"In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother." (1 John 3:10).
In other words, the Bible says it is so many different ways it is ridiculous to not get that we also have to live righteously as a part of eternal life. Jude 1:4 talks about those who turn God's grace into a license for immorality. On, and on the Word of God speaks such things.
BTW, if you search the Scriptures diligently, you will find that ...James 1:12 says, "Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried,
he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him."
The crown of life is promised to those that love Him (The Lord our GOD).
For Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15).
Which means, BH is NOT teaching grace-only, hyper-grace, easy-believism, etc.Where I am fervently against you (BH) is in the fact that you seem to be denying the grace of God. The bible makes it clear in many places we are saved not by obeying the law, be it new or old,
but rather by trusting in the finished work of Jesus on the cross. That is the work that we are called to primarily, to "believe in the one God sent [Jesus]".
BTW, if you search the Scriptures diligently, you will find that ...
"the crown of life" means ETERNAL LIFE!
I do not agree with the red ... it is incomplete and thus incorrect.Believers are initially and ultimately saved by God's grace (i.e. Jesus Christ).
It is why a person who comes to Jesus for the first time can have an assurance of salvation
(Without doing any kind of work).
Initial and ultimate salvation is a gift from God (Ephesians 2:8-9).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?