Who are thy Gods

[Crispie]

You do know that there is no 100% proof of the age of the earth through radiometric dating, even the inventor of Radiometric dating said its accuracy wasnt reliable.

 

[God_of_Mercy]

Dont try puting Jesus in your Hindu beliefs. He had nothing to do with it and thats just an excuse to explain him.

And why should he? The idea is mere superstition

Such a convincing arugment

 

[Crispie]

What I find funny is Jesus hated all religions besides Judaism and Christianity...and yet other religions adopt his teachings and even put him into their beliefs.

 

[ravenwolf]

What I find funny is Jesus hated all religions besides Judaism and Christianity...and yet other religions adopt his teachings and even put him into their beliefs.

If you are going on the bases of the Gospels and Jesus teachings that is entirely untrue....makes me wonder if you even read your own Bible. He never said he hated other religions, in fact hate was not a part of his teachings at all, Jesus taught love, it was the bases of his teachings.
Blessings
~ravenwolf

 

[Crispie]

Amos 5 is a good example of Gods hate and anger towards other religions(remember, not hating the followers but hating the faiths they followed), he was really angry when his people started to stray from him, following other beliefs.

 

[Achichem]

What I find funny is Jesus hated all religions besides Judaism and Christianity...and yet other religions adopt his teachings and even put him into their beliefs.

As Raven said that is most likely not true, but if you want to get technical, Jesus only ever directly supported Pharisaic Judaism (granted a reformed form), which Christianity is pretty far from. So, actually following your own logic, he hated Christianity just the same.

It was technically speaking, only Paul, who may have or may not have shown direct support for Christianity, and in so any claim that Jesus supported it, would have to accept the idea that an enlighten third party would know, which opens the door for the claim to be made by quite a few groups.

Anyway you cut it mate your just being stubborn minded, not that there anything wrong with that.

 

[ravenwolf]

yes, in the old testament. But it was not part of Jesus teachings.
Blessings
~ravenwolf

 

[peaceful soul]

You do know that there is no 100% proof of the age of the earth through radiometric dating, even the inventor of Radiometric dating said its accuracy wasnt reliable.

Cataclysms have occured on this earth over time. Those cataclysms would destroy any attempts to measure the earth anyway. Science has to assume so many things when measuring elements. They assume that the earth has been changing constantly, which is not the case.

 

[Fuzzy]

...and yet other religions adopt his teachings and even put him into their beliefs.

Could it be because those other religions thought he was pretty clever?

 

[Rae]

These are logical questions

They seem to be prejudiced attempts to slander non-Christians to me. Come on. What's logical about putting us down and saying that we just believe what we do out of convenience, as you have above? Or am I somehow misinterpreting your comment that

You really have nothing to back that up other than you dislike of Christianity.

?

If you want respect, you have to give it first. I haven't seen you giving it yet. It isn't logical to insult someone and then ask why they're behaving as if they've been insulted. Just FYI.

 

[Rae]

And MORE put-downs from the Great Logical Questioner...

Dont try puting Jesus in your Hindu beliefs. He had nothing to do with it and thats just an excuse to explain him.

Such a convincing arugment

What was the purpose of the above statements if not to insult people and show them disrespect?

 

[Proud Hindu]

Exactly Rae, this guy hasn't brought up one logical or valid point yet.

You do know that there is no 100% proof of the age of the earth through radiometric dating, even the inventor of Radiometric dating said its accuracy wasnt reliable.

And yet Christians try to use it as proof that Christ existed. Carbon dating is the most reliable way we have of measuring the age of anything. It works on simple logarithmic curves.

Dont try puting Jesus in your Hindu beliefs. He had nothing to do with it and thats just an excuse to explain him.

With all due respect… LOL!!! What the hell did you just say? You’re just rambling, that made no sense at all.

Such a convincing arugment

Thanks. I noticed you couldn’t answer it, or any of my other points.

What I find funny is Jesus hated all religions besides Judaism and Christianity...and yet other religions adopt his teachings and even put him into their beliefs.

What teachings? Last time I checked, Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism) did not incorporate the teachings of genocide, intolerance, cowardice, stupidity, and superstition of your “religion of peace.”

Cataclysms have occured on this earth over time. Those cataclysms would destroy any attempts to measure the earth anyway. Science has to assume so many things when measuring elements. They assume that the earth has been changing constantly, which is not the case.

Matter is neither created nor destroyed. Cataclysms would not affect anything, just change the physical nature of the matter being measured.

 

[Crispie]

Yeah, unfortunately Radiometric dating is one of the most reliable ways to date, since it being so innaccurate and all. And I dont use Radiometric dating's innaccuracy to prove Christ existed, theres extra-biblical documents for that, dont you mean that the earth is near 6k years old? Second of all, my religion isnt merely "religion of peace", Remember, Jesus didnt come to bring peace, but a sword.

 

[God_of_Mercy]

OK first of all I did not even ask the question to Hindus so i dont know why you are hear. I made this thread in the attempt to have a pagan answer my questions and i thought i might as well challenge there beliefs and see if there logic makes sence. I apologise if any of my commments have insulted you.

With all due respect… LOL!!! What the hell did you just say? You’re just rambling, that made no sense at all

Both these Avataras said that no one reaches God except through “I” or “Me.” But do you think they were referring to their physical selfs? Their physical bodies are long gone. They meant worship “I” as the Self, the Supreme Consciousness. Anyone who wholeheartedly worships in any form will reach the Truth.

What teachings? Last time I checked, Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism) did not incorporate the teachings of genocide, intolerance, cowardice, stupidity, and superstition of your “religion of peace.”

I thought only I put down other people and there religion.

this thread really turned into a disaster. All i wanted was someone to answer my claims. Again i apologize if my questions or comments seemed insulting to you.

 

[Proud Hindu]

I apologize as well, my comments were somewhat rude.

I posted in this thread because I share some of the beliefs as "pagans," anyways, sorry for my impolite posts.

 

[God_of_Mercy]

Ah I see, well im glad we both apologized

 

[Crispie]

 

[Nathan David]

You do know that there is no 100% proof of the age of the earth through radiometric dating, even the inventor of Radiometric dating said its accuracy wasnt reliable.

That's not true. Isn't there a commandment against lying?

 

[Crispie]

Look buddy, its been proven that Radiometric dating isnt 100% accurate, basically all supporters of Radiometric dating say its "Pretty Close to the real age", but your forgetting all the assumptions they do in order to date, its not reliable enouph.

 

[Nathan David]

Look buddy, its been proven that Radiometric dating isnt 100% accurate, basically all supporters of Radiometric dating say its "Pretty Close to the real age", but your forgetting all the assumptions they do in order to date, its not reliable enouph.

That's not true. Radiometric dating is accurate and reliable. It has not based on unverified "assumptions". Of course it has a margin of error, like any method of measurement, but that margin is known for each dating technique.