Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Blackhawk said:being assumed? It states it pretty plainly. And it ccan't be used to say that we can't do anything but sin after salvation since these verses are describing man in his natural state after tha fall and not the regenerated man. If it was describing the regenerated man then no one could ever have faith.
Well, I'll post the scripture:Blackhawk said:I won't step into y'all's conversation for too long but what do you mean by qualifying us? Are we saved because God sees something inside us that makes us worthy of salvation?
Please read the posts I have just written. I never wrote that we are saved because God finds us 'good enough".Dr Dex said:[Well, if God looks into a human heart and sees something the He did not put there (like some kind of goodness or love for Christ), wouldn't the final, ultimate reason any human being is saved be the condition of their heart? In other words, it looks like what you are saying is that some of us are saved because we are good enough -- apart from God's goodness in us -- to choose Christ. I know you don't mean that, but to me that is what your view must propose.
But we don't have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit unless we have accepted Christ. The Holy spirit is given as a promise (pledge) of our inheritance as children of God.As the proverb goes, "He who trusts in his own heart is a fool". Our heart, if ever left to itself, would certainly condemn us. It is only by the Spirit's indwelling influence that our heart can turn.
What scripture is that? I had already erased the scripture you had in this post by accident.That's why I would agree with Scriptures that God "grants" repentance.
What scripture is that? I had already erased the scripture you had in this post by accident.
Paul is writing to Timothy, a young pastor, about leading a church. I do not believe this verse means that one is initially freed from the devil and then brought repent of their sins and to salvation, but that Paul is talking about those who have been saved, yet need to be rebuked for certain behaviours that have a hold on them. Perhaps they are dealing with gossip or lust, or other things.Dr Dex said:And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient, in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, and that they may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil, having been taken captive by him to do his will. (2 Tim 2:24-26)
When God grants repentance, He does so by sending His Spirit to break the bonds that sin and the devil have on a human heart. When those bonds are broken, a person will come to their senses and know the truth. Why? Because the deceit of sin and Satan is THE BARRIER to a human's sight of the truth and a love of Christ.
IF God "breaks the bonds", and causes the Holy Spirit to dwell within a person BEFORE they have repented and believed, he would have writen about it elsewhere. Instead, he wrote just the opposite.
Reformationist said:I'm not going to try to explain them because I think you start with an incorrect understanding of most of Scripture so trying to explain particular verses that you pick out to prove your point would be fighting an uphill battle. I will just tell you that I believe Scripture is clear that unregenerate man is morally incapable of inclining himself towards God. He must first be given a heart that desires to serve. God's monergistic act of giving that heart is regeneration.
What is this aversion so many people have to punctuation? I do not disagree that believers shall not perish. What I disagree with is your belief that man, while dead in his trespasses and sins, submits to God. The Bible says, and I quote, "Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be" (Romans 8:7).
Riiight. Do you realize how silly it sounds to make this claim? Does Jesus come to you and personally preach His Word? If not, you are either relying on your own interpretation or the interpretation of someone you trust. This doesn't make your belief wrong but it most certainly doesn't make it "merely the Bible's opinion."
Faith in God is the means by which He saves us. It isn't separate to salvation. It's part of it.
I'm sorry but I disagree with your interpretation of those verses. I see the Lord giving us a His Spirit AFTER we repent and believe - it's part of the new Covenant that He makes with those who come to faith. I do not believe that these verses are saying that He puts His Spirit in us and then we come to believe in Jesus.Dr Dex said:Where?
What I see are a lot of promises to send the Spirit SO THAT God's people will repent.
I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will keep My judgments and do them. (Eze 36:26-27)
The Lord opened her heart to heed the things spoken by Paul. (Acts 16:14)
We repent, and do so willingly... often passionately. We're not forced to repent when we do not want to, but our hearts are opened by the Spirit to heed the things of God, and so we willingly repent.
Our repentance and faith reveals the presence of Jesus in us. Otherwise, how does a wicked human heart come to repent? By what moral power, if not the power of Christ, can a human heart come to genuine, heart-felt repentance?
I see the Lord giving us a His Spirit AFTER we repent and believe - it's part of the new Covenant that He makes with those who come to faith. I do not believe that these verses are saying that He puts His Spirit in us and then we come to believe in Jesus.
A man comes to Christ after being drawn by the Father. The Father speaks to to a person - but that does not mean that person believes and is already saved.Dr Dex said:FreeinChrist,
The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. (1 Cor 2:14)
If a man does not have the Spirit, how does he come to repent? By what moral power, if not the power of Christ, can a human heart come to genuine, heart-felt repentance?
A man comes to Christ after being drawn by the Father. The Father speaks to to a person - but that does not mean that person believes and is already saved.
Dr Dex said:Don,
I'm new here, and you weren't talkin' to me, but I'm going to answer your question anyway.
Salvation is more than just the moment of conversion. If sovereign election is true, then there is a certain sense in which the elect are saved before Creation. If you are equating salvation to our time of justification, then there is a certain sense in which the elect are saved upon the time of faith.
That is why "justification" is an important word. Faith justifies our claim to salvation. We can say we are "saved" because we have faith. However, if a person's faith is a result of God's sovereign work of grace, from God's viewpoint, that person was always "being saved".
So, if Don is elect, he was "being saved" before he had faith, though now that he has faith, he is justified to claim that salvation. Before he had faith, nobody but God knew he was being saved.
Not exactly. The Spirit DOES NOT indwell an unsaved person. The Spirit will speak to a person, drawing a person to Christ, but the person MUST believe and repent to receive forgiveness. There is no salvation without being forgiven, cleansed and regenerated.Dr Dex said:Huh? A person's salvation is justified on the basis of faith. A man is justified by faith. Do you agree with that statement?
So, if the Father sends the Spirit to draw a person, isn't that person already BEING SAVED? God is in the process of saving that person, and the reality of that person's salvation is justified by faith.
What's the big deal?
Not exactly. The Spirit DOES NOT indwell an unsaved person. The Spirit will speak to a person, drawing a person to Christ, but the person MUST believe and repent to receive forgiveness. There is no salvation without being forgiven, cleansed and regenerated.
Dr Dex said:Pardon me, but your semantics are not Scriptural. Regeneration is the coming of the Spirit, Who makes real and practical the cleansing of the blood of Christ in a human heart. When He comes there is repentance and faith. Thus, there is no indwelling Spirit in an unsaved person because His coming brings salvation.
[/quote}
Well, I disagree very much! My 'semantics' are based on studying the meaning of the language scripture is written.
Regeneration is the translated from the Greek word 'paliggenesia' - means rebirth. Yes, the Spirit is involoved with rebirth...but not til a person repents and believes.
If I understand your position, it's that unregenerate man is incapable of believing in God (not being made in the image of God ?) and therefore, God saves the person, cleanses him, regernerates him with the Holy Spirit - and then the peson is able to to come to a belief and able to repent of sin - having no real choice in the matter at all. God picks one person but not another.
IMHO that flies in the face of the gospel.
How do you explain the OT saints who never had the indwelling of the Holy Spirit at all? the indwelling is unique to the New Covenant. Yet there are OT saints.
And I notice you aren't responding to the question I asked regarding the Holy Spirit - in several places in scripture it clearly states the Spirit is given to us as a pledge of our inheritance. You would have me believe contrary to that scripture - and that the pledge is made to those who have not yet repented. You haven't addressed that at all - and looks to me that you just sidestepped it.
Creative name you came up with. But I don't follow Scofield, and have come to my views of salvation via scripture alone. Nothing you have written disproves what I have gleamed from study.We can't take 21st century Scofieldian Christianese and reinsert it onto the New Testament.
I would advise against taking verses out of context and instead that one looks at all of what scripture says about salvation and understand that each verse has to fit not only the passage it is in, but also the whole message of God in the Bible.
Perhaps we should agree to disagree???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?