• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Which bible?

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,896
9,877
✟367,481.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Which one is the intact and unchanged version?

Obviously English versions are translations. Most modern translations are, to a first approximation, equally good. The ESV is probably a little better than most.
 
Upvote 0

ChesterKhan

No, Emotions are not a good reason!
Jul 28, 2014
191
9
35
Omaha, NE, USA
✟30,374.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Given that Revelations 22 says:



I am wondering what bible I should be reading.

Which one is the intact and unchanged version?

Common sense might be helpful.

A question: do we have the original texts of the Old or the New Testaments?

If we do not have the originals, how can we have a completely "unchanged" version? ;) We have no such thing as a "pure" Bible. It's all Tradition. The books in the Bible are in there because it is what our forefathers, the Apostles, taught us to believe is the Word of God. And while it is very unified, and that is to its credit, let's face it: it's no Koran, nor a Book of Mormon. Those flashed into existence over less than half a century. All the books and chapters in those books are and were undisputed, period, in their circles. The Church had been debating if the letters of John, the Revelation, 2 Peter, Hebrews, etc were letters by the Apostles, or canonical. And they considered some books - like The Shepherd, and even the Book of Wisdom - as canonical New Testament. There was legitimate disagreement about canon.

We don't have a magical book. We have a "magical" authority - or rather, miraculous. The Church. The bishops. The Successors of the Apostles. They gave us the Bible. God gave us the Bible through them.
 
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,914
17,129
Canada
✟294,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The New American Standard Bible is the most literal translation (NASB). I grew up with the King James Version which can be hard to understand. It helps to compare translations. For example for certain verses I like how the Message version is down to Earth and easy to understand. The New Living Translation (NLT) is also very literal. Biblegateway.com provides the opportunity to see translations side by side. When you compare many of the translations the meaning or the message of the verse or passage that you are reading should be similar. The two versions that I read most often are the Apologetics Study Bible (Version: Holman Christian Standard Bible) that is really good for students and that provides a lot of good question and answer sections. The other is the Every Man's Battle Bible (Version: New Living Translation) (which is geared toward men but I like that it is easy to understand and yet it is still a good translation. This is a good question :)

For those unfamiliar with long narratives in Scripture, a more paraphrased version might have its uses. But for word for word study, verse by verse, it's good to use a more formal, word accurate version.
 
Upvote 0