• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Where is the Evidence of a Gap in the 70 weeks of Dan 9?

Is there a "gap" in the 70 weeks of Daniel 9"


  • Total voters
    63

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus is Abraham's Seed, not the unbelieving Jews. Abraham's seed is Israel.
 
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,609
2,107
Texas
✟204,831.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus is Abraham's Seed, not the unbelieving Jews. Abraham's seed is Israel.


Maybe I'm just not grasping in which sense you are meaning? So maybe you are correct for all I know. But the way it sounds on the surface, that Christ is Israel, it just doesn't sound right to me.
 
Upvote 0

Dave L

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 28, 2018
15,549
5,879
USA
✟580,230.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Maybe I'm just not grasping in which sense you are meaning? So maybe you are correct for all I know. But the way it sounds on the surface, that Christ is Israel, it just doesn't sound right to me.
Consider Matthew's use of Hosea.

“When Israel was a child, then I loved him, And called my son out of Egypt.” (Hosea 11:1)

“And [Jesus] was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.” (Matthew 2:15)
 
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Israel is not God. Christ is God, therefore can't also be Israel. Christ existed before there ever was an Israel. Was He Israel then too?

Jacob (Israel) was a shadow of Christ, in the same way that Abraham offering Isaac in the land of Moriah was a shadow of Christ.
Some people believe it was on the same spot where Christ would later be crucified.


Luk 24:25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:
Luk 24:26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
Luk 24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

He did not say "Moses (Pentateuch), and some of the prophets. He said "all".

On the road to Emmaus the risen Savior revealed that the whole Old Testament is about Him.

.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
15,090
2,590
84
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟351,455.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Maybe I'm just not grasping in which sense you are meaning? So maybe you are correct for all I know. But the way it sounds on the surface, that Christ is Israel, it just doesn't sound right to me.
We need to understand the meaning of the word; 'Israel'
It was given to Jacob when he overcame the angel. It literally means; One who prevails with God and in his case; a Prince of God.
It refers to Jesus, as an Overcomer for God and therefore to His believers and followers, as stated in each of the seven Church's of Revelation and plainly by Paul in Galatians 6:16
 
Upvote 0

A71

Well-Known Member
Mar 8, 2017
777
265
59
Europe
✟45,457.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

There are two Israels. That is why Paul refers to two Israels, and why he uses the typology of Esau and Jacob, the twins, who flipped the birthright.
Spiritual Israel, represented by Jacob, is the Church, who inherit the birthright.
Physical Israel, represented by Esau, are presently still
Blinded by and under the Law, and they forfeited the birthright. The genetic argument is Not germane here as anyone could become an Israelite under the Law. Anyone, be they Israelite or other, who follows Judaism, is an Israelite of the flesh, by assimilation.

The curve-ball that causes so much trouble is Zionism. These people are not Jews, i.e. They are not physical Israel. Why?
Because Israel was under a mandatory punishment; the scattering, the 'diaspora', was a punishment mandated by The Old Covenant, (Levitical and Mosaic), and it cannot be annulled arbitrarily by man. The Zionists, by returning to Israel when they should have been in diaspora, pending God's next judgement or decree, have flouted the Law and ceased to be under it.
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
29,975
3,560
Non-dispensationalist
✟413,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That interpretation is possible only if the verses are scrambled around, to be rewritten.

And to think that Titus has a function to be in the 70 weeks. What difference would it make of who was the leader of the Romans when the Romans destroyed the temple and city?

If it were a referral to Titus as being the prince, it would not be necessary to say "the people of", and just say the prince who shall come will destroy the city and sanctuary.
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
29,975
3,560
Non-dispensationalist
✟413,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I agree in principle. But I think it was also that Antiochus had a statue image of Zeus placed in the temple - and that is what the abomination of desolation in the end times will be in similitude - if not exact, a statue image of Zeus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Your argument is valid.

People read only Matthew 24 and not Luke 21, hence they do not see the fulfillment of Daniel's prophecies in 70 AD.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I agree in principle. But I think it was also that Antiochus had a statue image of Zeus placed in the temple - and that is what the abomination of desolation in the end times will be in similitude - if not exact, a statue image of Zeus.

Joh 10:22 And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter.

.
 
Upvote 0

DaDad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2017
1,142
142
72
Southwest
✟107,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Re: "Seven and sixty-two"

Most English Versions cite the "seven" and the "sixty-two" as one number. Newton discredited this premise:

Sir Isaac Newton’s DANIEL AND THE APOCALYPSE

by Sir William Whitla, London, 1922, Chapt. X, p. 281 https://archive.org/stream/danielandtheapoc00newtuoft#page/n251/mode/2up


We avoid also the doing violence to the language of Daniel, by taking the seven weeks and sixty two weeks for one number. Had that been Daniel’s meaning, he would have said sixty and nine weeks, and not seven weeks and sixty two weeks, a way of numbering used by no nation.

Can ANYONE cite any Scriptural or Societal instance where a ~pair of shoes cost seven and sixty-two dollars plus tax~?

Perhaps the "Classical Commentary" version is fatally flawed in Scriptural text, context, and history. But other than that, -- it's good to go.

Thanks,
DaDad
 
Upvote 0

DaDad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2017
1,142
142
72
Southwest
✟107,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
... Antiochus had a statue image of Zeus placed in the temple ...

... and the other "interpretations" for the Prophecies of Daniel are equally flawed.

Has anyone read Daniel 12:4 & 9?

Thanks,
DaDad
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Newton had the 2nd coming occurring by 2015. But he was unquestionably a brilliant individual.
 
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

DaDad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2017
1,142
142
72
Southwest
✟107,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Newton had the 2nd coming occurring by 2015. But he was unquestionably a brilliant individual.
Ummmmm, Newton REFUSED to publish his own book. His followers published Newston's work.
It's noteworthy that Newton easily discredited the premises the "Classical Commentators" proposed, as they failed the Scriptural/Historical examination. That's why Newton began his own attempt to solve that which CLEARLY hadn't been fulfilled. But Newton's own premises failed the Scriptural/Historical examination, and Newton realized this. Thus he refused to publish.

Could it be that the Prophecies of Daniel are ACTUALLY END-TIME PROPHECIES? Perhaps THAT'S why neither the "Classical Commentators" nor Newton were able to resolve the Scriptural/Historical aspects. It's too bad that now we're in the End-Times, but there's no one who can resolve the Scriptural/Historical puzzles.

DaDad
 
Upvote 0

DaDad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2017
1,142
142
72
Southwest
✟107,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
History confirms Jesus fulfilled the unbroken prophecy in the middle of the 70th week as written.

Ummmmm, the COMMENTATORS confirm "Jesus" as having fulfilled Daniel 9, but neither Scripture nor History supports this premise.

Perhaps there's an end time "anointed one" who was killed (assassinated) in, oooooh, say about November of 1995?

Thanks,
DaDad
 
Upvote 0

Anto9us

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2013
5,105
2,041
Texas
✟95,775.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I don't understand Newton's comments at all, but it is past 2015 now, not that he wasn't brilliant.

SO - okay - 69.5 weeks is indeed after 69 weeks; though that's a bit awkward, because you would normally think that if Messiah is cut off AFTER 69 weeks, that that means RIGHT after -- at the end of the 69th week -- but as I say, 69.5 weeks is also AFTER 69 weeks, its just awkward.

But if Christ is cut off at a "mid-week point" (69.5 weeks) then one more half week (3 1/2 years) would totally complete the seventy shauvim. And I have heard it put forth that 3 1/2 years past when Christ was cut off puts one at the stoning of Stephen -"old" Israel's last chance - which they blow...

So in that view the entire 480 years is done with before Titus, before Nero, and the prophecy specific to "the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary" happens totally outside the 70 weeks, as does the Abomination of Desolation - which some say was Roman Standards in the Temple grounds, at 70 AD rather than inside the seventy weeks.

I don't know that ANY "gaps" are needed if the whole 70 shauvim runs its course by the stoning of Stephen; and the abomination takes place totally outside the 70 weeks
 
Upvote 0

Anto9us

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2013
5,105
2,041
Texas
✟95,775.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Could it be that the Prophecies of Daniel are ACTUALLY END-TIME PROPHECIES?

it could be, yeah, but the incredible part is that the 70 weeks prophecy can be seen to go from a commandment to rebuild Jerusalem ( 2 or 3 dates could be used for that, usually 457 BC or 444 BC are best starting points for the whole 70 weeks) and we come just about nail-on-the-head to Christ being cut off, this in a book not even in "The Prophets" section of OT Canon, but in the Writings -- and the prophecy holds whether Daniel was a real guy in Babylonian times, or if Daniel was a pseudonym and it was written in Macabeean times - no scholars can take away the basic time-line of "command to re-build" up to Jesus; regardless of all the Antiochus Epiphanes they want to produce
 
Upvote 0

DaDad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2017
1,142
142
72
Southwest
✟107,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
... if Messiah is cut off AFTER 69 weeks, that that means RIGHT after ...
Ummmmm, please correct your statement to include, "I believe" between your two -thats-. Otherwise you're simple imposing a textual preference rather than adhering to what it actually says.

Thanks,
DaDad
 
Upvote 0

DaDad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 28, 2017
1,142
142
72
Southwest
✟107,784.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
... the 70 weeks prophecy can be seen to go from a commandment to rebuild Jerusalem ...

Walvoord cites Young, who observed that the "going forth of the word" does NOT have the inference of any edict from man, but rather and edict directly from GOD. As such, if you consider Daniel 9:2, you should discover that the "perceived" is the biyn, -- Solomon Wisdom --, versus the simple shama. 1 Kings 3 is the best reference, where Solomon asked for shama, and GOD said HE would grant Solomon what he asked for, and give him such biyn that no man before him and no man after him shall have such biyn.

As such, if reading the Book of Jeremiah were the case, Daniel would have used shama. But if there were A DIFFERENT text "in the Books", then perhaps we could look at the Book of Psalms for the biyn "going forth of the word".

Have you read Psalms 24 recently?
DaDad
 
Upvote 0