Wouldn't it be antithetical then for any Christian to argue that we remain in those sins and be accepted as those who are proudly unrepentant of them?
Upvote
0
Even sadder is how many "Christians" seem to care for nothing else besides who is getting married, and equate gay marriage to "outlawing all morality, decency and Godly values."
It's beyond sad, it's horrifying really.
No, He's not "pro gay or pro adultery"
He's pro people.
He came to free us FROM those things that will destroy us.
THAT's a message of love.
God loves sinners but hates sin. A contrite sinner who seeks obedience loves God, a sinner who does not seek obedience loves only their self. The Greatest commandment is to love God.
I think this is safe to say.
You'd think so.Wouldn't it be antithetical then for any Christian to argue that we remain in those sins and be accepted as those who are proudly unrepentant of them?
Where does loving your neighbor entail condoning their sin?
You'd think so.
Not only that but cruel and hateful too.
Embracing your sisters bondage to booze
or sex or anything else that's going to keep
her in bondage
I imagined as much but after reading the other person I was not so sure.I was talking about myself. But apparently there are two of us.
The 2nd is to love your neighbor as yourself.
This I think might be the difference in emphasis.
Only if you twist the Scripture enough to make it work.Where, indeed. Who is saying that they condone sin -- or not?
From the OP, is it a sin to be of another race? I do not think so.
Is it a sin to be gay? I do not think so.
It's a lie from hell designed to kill steal and destroy.I would indeed. What then is the point of Christ dying so as to free the world from sin? If there are Christians arguing what seems to be a revised doctrine that says Christ was OK with certain sins and it is then those who do not agree with that that are to be condemned.
Because you must be born again to see the kingdom.I would indeed. What then is the point of Christ dying so as to free the world from sin? If there are Christians arguing what seems to be a revised doctrine that says Christ was OK with certain sins and it is then those who do not agree with that that are to be condemned.
Where, indeed. Who is saying that they condone sin -- or not?
I agree. We are all made in the image of God.From the OP, is it a sin to be of another race? I do not think so.
Is not a sin to be gay but it is a sin to practice homosexuality. And this is as far as I'm going to discuss this topic given the posting rules of CF.Is it a sin to be gay? I do not think so.
I think there's a difference between believing something to be a sin and being unrepentant of it, and not believing it to be a sin. Isn't Romans 14 really on the nail here?Wouldn't it be antithetical then for any Christian to argue that we remain in those sins and be accepted as those who are proudly unrepentant of them?
The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them. Who are you to judge someone elses servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand.
Being judgmental isn't a peculiarly religious (or liberal or conservative) trait. It's a human trait.
I'm pro-life and economically liberal, and I've spent a lot of time on different political forums, and no group has a monopoly on invective or paranoia or sanctimony. The New Atheists really are as Manichean as their fundamentalist counterparts. Made for each other.
Just wondering - don't people who are anti-gay or racist need God's love just like anyone else in the world?
Where, indeed. Who is saying that they condone sin -- or not?
From the OP, is it a sin to be of another race? I do not think so.
Is it a sin to be gay? I do not think so.