- Nov 25, 2020
- 188
- 44
- 64
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
What? What are you even saying?...since he won legitimately I'm going with legitimate.
tulc(wishes all questions were this easy)
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What? What are you even saying?...since he won legitimately I'm going with legitimate.
tulc(wishes all questions were this easy)
Usually when someone makes claims.. they back it up with evidence.Thats where i stand.
Trump has zero credibility.
When you constantly lie that tends to happen. Simply pathetic.
But if I was to answer that I'd probably point to something like this:Usually when someone makes claims.. they back it up with evidence.
tulc(is a fan of links)(snip) Trump has zero credibility.
When you constantly lie that tends to happen. (snip)
I see nothing here that is of any evidence.But if I was to answer that I'd probably point to something like this:
these are the 154 pants on fires President Trump has received:
| PolitiFact
and these are the 335 false ratings President Trump has received
| PolitiFact
or if you're interested in chronological order:
2017
Fact check: The biggest whoppers of 2017. Trump claims topped list
2018
Trump's 10 biggest falsehoods of 2018
2019 (this one ended with one sort of true thing)
Trump's 10 biggest false claims in 2019 — and one that finally became true
if you're looking for just one subject you could try here:
All the President’s Lies About the Coronavirus
this particular one's not done yet, so expect updates to follow.
I hope there's enough links in the above to help you form a picture of just why people say
tulc(is a fan of links)
what are you saying in post 101...the irony in this post? It's pretty amazing.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)
I don't see anything that is of any valid evidence, in any of that.You asked someone a question, I chimed in and answered is as well
tulc(is going to need more coffee soon)
That would probably be because you never bothered to click on the couple of hundred links in just the first two links before you responded. In the future? You shouldn't ask for evidence about claims if you don't really want any. But, there's plenty in those links if you do decide to look.I see nothing here that is of any evidence.
No, that's because I don't see any valid evidence presented by your posts.That would probably be because you never bothered to click on the couple of hundred links in just the first two links before you responded. In the future? You shouldn't ask for evidence about claims if you don't really want any. But, there's plenty in those links if you do decide to look.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)
and again: there are literally hundreds of links in just the first two things I posted 6 minutes ago. so you saying "you didn't find any valid evidence" in links you've literally had no time to even skim the surface of let alone click on any of the links found in the links I posted kind of sounds a little...suspect.I don't see anything that is of any valid evidence, in any of that.
I just fail to see evidence in any of those links, that justifies your view.and again: there are literally hundreds of links in just the first two things I posted 6 minutes ago. so you saying "you didn't find any valid evidence" in links you've literally had no time to even skim the surface of let alone click on any of the links found in the links I posted kind of sounds a little...suspect.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)
Well, I just don't see enough here to show anything of any significance. Sorry, its just talk and no support. Words are cheap.Except they do. And for future reference: "dismissing isn't refuting".
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out)
So, tulc.....are you even one little bit now starting to feel the way each one of those 1000 people who have sworn and signed affidavits as eye witnesses feel when they are told that their words are not enough to mean anything? What they saw is real and more trustworthy than some puppet sitting on some committee and all the while worrying about getting re elected...While the honest people of the US swear that democracy is dead? And you.......say there is no evidence..Biden won..just because thats your wish.....even if its a farce.Well...in fairness, you might have seen some if you'd looked at them.
tulc(just thought that should be pointed out part 2)
They are both puppets so why does it matter?
Who really runs all of the countries?
Satan runs ALL of the kingdoms of the earth.
Who is the god of this world?
This is why the bible never states waste time to get involved in the political race and a country's puppeteer elections. Instead, it says to worry about eternal things like soul winning.
Ahhh! The famous "I only ignored all the proof I asked people to post, just so I could teach a valuable lesson!"? Well...I suspect you did indeed teach a lesson...probably not the one you think you taught, but still...a lesson none the less.So, tulc.....are you even one little bit now starting to feel the way each one of those 1000 people who have sworn and signed affidavits as eye witnesses feel when they are told that their words are not enough to mean anything?
No, Biden won legitimately. Biden is not going to be found guilty of treason because he hasn’t committed treason. You need to learn the law.Do you think that the Biden government is going to go soft on those trying to end his soft coup against your democracy and your constitution? Seriously?
If successful with their affidavits... Biden could be found guilty of treason. Do you even know how serious this is?
Well, you better tell that to the people in the video.. pulling tubs of ballets out from under a table and scanning them under a cloak of secrecy.