Hi zagzig,
You wrote:
Not yet. However they are real people with eye witness accounts and signed affidavits.
Let me ask you. How many affidavits are there? I mean it is a fixed number. They are sheets of paper and can be counted. How many affidavits are there?
Let me ask you. Let's assume that there are at least 10. Do you know what those 10 affidavits are alleging? Remember, an affidavit from a witness is merely an alleging of something happening. Affidavits are then taken by an attorney into a courtroom and presented and then it is up to the court to decide on them. Just because someone has an affidavit, doesn't mean that some crime occurred or that someone is guilty. It is merely a sworn testimony of something that the affiant tells what they saw. Do you know what 10 of those affidavits are alleging?
You see, the reason I ask is because in a court case, the judge does get to see all applicable evidence that is contained in any affidavits that concerns a particular case. So far, every judge, whether he be a Republican, for which there have been many in these cases, or Democrat, has determined that the provided witness testimony does not meet any legal claim of fraud. Today, even Atty Gen. Barr has put out that there have not been any FBI or justice department investigations that have uncovered any fraud of any consequence.
So, I think you need to understand that this stack of affidavits and filings that Giuliani and Powell, et.al. are holding out to your face, but won't show you, judges have seen them! Judges have determined that there is no worthwhile legal merit in any one of them. Judges have said that most of these affidavits are merely sworn statements of what someone saw that they '
thought' might be some criminal behavior, but have turned out not to be.
The 'trump election fraud' team put out a phone number encouraging people across the nation to call with their fraud claims. Now come on. You've lived in this world long enough to know that such an effort to gain information from the public is going to be filled with the musings of a number of crack pots. From what I'm hearing, some of the claims did, at first, seem to have merit. But after checking them out and presenting the evidence, if it checked out to the courts, it's all been rejected.
I still keep hearing about the burning of ballots. That account has been soundly debunked. It was a stack of practice ballots that the elections office had used to train the actual ballot counters. To ensure that they were not somehow slipped back into the counting process, the local elections office thought they should be burned. And so they did. But it was not any kind of fraud or illegal activity. It was the burning of fake filled out ballots for the purpose of training counters. That's it!!!
So, put some facts where your mouth is. Explain to me what 10 of the affidavits claim.
God bless,
ted