Innumerable scholars, both Jewish and Christian, have attempted to calculate the date of Creation. Even if they used the same basis (Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible) for their systems of accounting, there is a broad range among their estimates. The historian des Vignoles stated in the introduction to his treatise on chronology that he had found well over 200 different calculations of the time from the birth of the world to the fall of the Second Temple, and that they varied by as much as 3,500 years. Well into the rule of Queen Victoria of England the most commonly given date for Creation was the year 4004 B.C.E., calculated by Bishop Usher, who published this date in 1654.
I'd challenge the factual accuracy of the bolded section.
Using Usher's date for "Creation" may have been common in popular writing, but not in scientific writing. By the early 1830s, following the publication of Lyell's 'Principles of Geology' the general opinion from the evidence of geology and chemistry was that the earth was, at the very least, 10s of millions of years old.
Settling actual age of the earth to a reasonable degree of accuracy took another 120 years of work, but by the time of the reign of Queen Victoria, few actual geologists accepted an age of the earth measuring mere thousands of years. Even the catastrophist and 'scriptural geologists' accepted the evidence only allowed for an age of the earth in millions of years, rather than thousands.
Upvote
0