Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There was no malicious intent in using colored and enlarge fonts to emphasize my points, and if I had known it causes you any "eyestrain" I wouldn't have done that. Now that I know, I won't.Wait...let me put on sunglasses to see if I can block the distracting bright colors.
Okay, now.....
I'm not going in circles...I have read the passage and...I UNDERSTAND THE PASSAGE!!!
I'm not in the mood for you and your color-code remarks.
Have a good day.
I believe jesus also said elijah " shall" come which is future tense
Matthew 17:11
And Jesus answered and said to them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
1. Shall come is future tense
2. Did John restore all things?
Also, what does the name of the archangel Michael mean? Michael is a Hebrew male name that is derived from the question Who is like God? or Who is like El?. And we know the book of Daniel speaks of Michael coming for his people at the end of days. Daniel 12:1 (NKJV) - At that time Michael shall stand up, The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; And there shall be a time of trouble, Such as never was since there was a nation, Even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, Every one who is found written in the book."
Much nonsense here. Jesus made it very clear that John the Baptist was Elijah.
Did it have to be "perfect" or did it just have to begin?
Keras...I'm curious, do you read your bible...or read at it? Read these verses:In no way does John the Baptist fulfil all the prophesies about the 'Elijah' promised in the last days. He may have done so, if the Jews of his day had received him and Jesus.
Did John B. reconcile families and lift the curse on the holy Land?
Did he convert the rebellious to the ways of righteousness and prepare a people that would be fit for the Lord?
Certainly not in the way that is prophesied to happen in the end time.
To think that that what John did, was all that the Elijah promised will do, is sheer preterist absurdity.
Keras...I'm curious, do you read your bible...or read at it? Read these verses:
Malachi 5:
5 Behold, I am going to send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord.
6 He will restore the hearts of the fathers to their children and the hearts of the children to their fathers, so that I will not come and smite the land with a curse.
Now Luke 1:14-17:
14 You will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth.
15 For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mothers womb.
16 And he will turn many of the sons of Israel back to the Lord their God.
17 It is he who will go as a forerunner before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers back to the children, and the disobedient to the attitude of the righteous, so as to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.
John the Baptist is in "the spirit and power" of Elijah...and the above passage from Luke 1, makes it VERY CLEAR...that's what Malachi 5:5, 6...is referring to.
Jon Anon...you may as well move on...you thought Elijah would come some time ago. WHen that failed..you disappeared.apparently she reads more of you than you as she has read matthew 17:11
American King James Version
And Jesus answered and said to them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
future tense "shall come" and john in the spirit of elijah did not restore all things.
Jon Anon...you may as well move on...you thought Elijah would come some time ago. WHen that failed..you disappeared.
As for Matthew 17:11...did you just stop there...OR did you include the rest of the passage:?
12 but I say to you that Elijah already came, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they wished. So also the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.
13 Then the disciples understood that He had spoken to them about John the Baptist.
Is that registering?
When you take all the accounts of this...it's crystal clear this was John the Baptist...but when you only want to look at portions...and not look at everything...you end up with your nonsense...stargazing and "what not".
First you have to understand what "restore all things" means...obviuosly you don't.John didn't restore all things....no getting past it
First you have to understand what "restore all things" means...obviuosly you don't.
The reference is to Malachi 4 ( as I showed before)...in case you never read it that defines what restore all things means:
Malachi 4:5, 6
5 Behold, I am going to send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord.
6 He will restore the hearts of the fathers to their children and the hearts of the children to their fathers, so that I will not come and smite the land with a curse.
When you read scripture...you put these things toghther based on all the accounts. So the next move is to read Luke 1:13-17
You'll find Luke says the SAME thing Malcahi says...so when Jesus said "John would restore restore all things"...He's speaking of the heart...as Malachi and Luke are saying.
By the way...lets not forget Matthew 11:14 which Codjer pointed out before:
14 And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.
There's also Mark 9:11-13:
11 They asked Him, saying, Why is it that the scribes say that Elijah must come first?
12 And He said to them, Elijah does first come and restore all things. And yet how is it written of the Son of Man that He will suffer many things and be treated with contempt?
13 But I say to you that Elijah has indeed come, and they did to him whatever they wished, just as it is written of him.
No getting around it...John the Baptist is in the spirit and power of Elijah!
OK...I had my say, so whatever you think. Dispensational theology is not valid as I view scripture. I've said that earlier...so run with whatever you think. "The Day" will reveal it.
So think Elijah is coming...and when he doesn't...AND HE WON'T...think again.
There are NO lost tribes...that's NONSENSE...a creation of man's thinking.
There is no millennium...you're in the millennium now and have been since Christ was seated at God's right hand.
Dispensational theology/eschatology is not in accord with scripture.
ebedmelech said in post 698:
...you're in the millennium now and have been since Christ was seated at God's right hand.
ebedmelech said in post 698:
Dispensational theology/eschatology is not in accord with scripture.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?