• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

When Were You "Saved"?

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
When were you saved? is one of the questions asked me many times over the years, and I'm sure the same is true of many of you.

What an important question. Salvation is, after all, "the one thing needful", the only thing that will really matter "in the great day". But until the Lord came along and began to teach me about this subject I didn't realize how erroneous my views on this "so great Salvation" subject were; as it turns out now, in hindsight, they were fatally so.

And, after I was the subject of "efficacious Grace", it was many years before I understood the place of, and difference between "the call", efficaious, versus general, and, in turn, "regeneration" in the process of conversion and sanctification. Even today, Satan attempts to trip me up, and I have to go back and restudy and rethink these things, and as Peter said, be "stirred up by way of reminder".

The following quote from "A Fourfold Salvation" has been a great help to me in dealing with the assaults of the Adversary as to the validity of my own regeneration and conversion. A sad and confused victim for many years of the "Christianity Light" version of the gospel, first in thinking I was saved when I wasn't (Satan's number one Lie) and then thinking I wasn't when I was (Satan's number two lie, when the Spirit has dealt with the first).

A member of this Forum recently asked about hypocrisy and Pharisaism and how to evaluate oneself in that regard. It is an excellent question and one which I believe God plants in the hearts of all true believers as a symptom of "the fear of God" which "is the beginnig of wisdom". In my own case, once I was indeed regenerated, many things changed, not the least of which was a search for the marks of true conversion. I wanted to know, for the first time, more than anything else, was I, Am I, really a true Child of God? This piece deals with some of them, those marks, particularly the "negative" ones, for lack of a better term, in a unique way I think.

In my own experience, looking back, there were many things that testified, from scripture, that I was indeed a subject of saving grace. But it was not until I read the works of men like Bunyan, Edwards, Ryle, Goodwin, Payson and Pink that I began to sort the false teaching, absorbed over a lifetime (my efficacious call came late, at age 39) from the true.

The following quote (from the introduction of this piece) by Pink was an help to me in sorting this out, and especially in getting to the bottom of the issue of sin, as a concept and as a reality in my own life, and as it exists in "the thoughts and intents of the heart". The quote itself doesn't deal with sin so much as the following sections but is a good introduction and I offer it hear in the hope that it might be of help to others, and to solicit ideas and reactions as to Pink's comments on same. May His Spirit accompany it's reading is my prayer.



"The subject of God’s "so-great-salvation" (Heb. 2:3), as it is revealed to us in the Scriptures and made known in Christian experience, is worthy of a life’s study. Any one who supposes that there is now no longer any need for him to prayerfully search for a fuller understanding of the same needs to ponder "If any man think he knoweth anything, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know" (1 Cor. 8:2). The fact is that the moment any of us really takes it for granted that he already knows all that there is to be known on any subject treated of in Holy Writ, he at once cuts himself off from any further light thereon. That which is most needed by all of us in order to a better understanding of Divine things is not a brilliant intellect, but a truly humble heart and a teachable spirit, and for that we would daily and fervently pray, for we possess it not by nature.
The subject of Divine salvation has, sad to say, provoked age-long controversy and bitter contentions even among Christians. There is comparatively little agreement even upon this elementary vet vital truth. Some have insisted that salvation is by Divine grace, others have argued that it is by human endeavor. A number have sought to defend the middle position, and while allowing that the salvation of a lost sinner must be by Divine grace, were not willing to concede that it is by Divine grace alone, alleging that God’s grace must be plussed by something from the creature, and very varied have been the opinions of what that ‘something must be—baptism, church-membership, the performing of good works, holding out faithful to the end, etc. On the other hand, there are those who not only grant that salvation is by grace alone, but who deny that God uses any means whatever in the accomplishment of His eternal purpose to save His elect—overlooking the fact that the sacrifice of Christ is the grand "means’!
It is true that the Church of God was blessed with super-creation blessings, being chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world and predestinated unto the adoption of children, and nothing could or can alter that grand fact. It is equally true that if sin had never entered the world, none had been in need of salvation from it. But sin has entered, and the Church fell in Adam and came under the curse and condemnation of God’s Law. Consequently, the elect, equally with the reprobate, shared in the capital offence of their federal head, and partake of its fearful entail: "In Adam all die" (1 Cor. 15:22): "By the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation" (Rom. 5:18). The result of this is, that all are "alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their hearts" (Eph. 4:18), so that the members of the mystical Body of Christ are "by nature the children of wrath, even as others" (Eph. 2:3), and hence they are alike in dire need of God’s salvation.
Even when there is fundamental soundness in their views upon Divine salvation many have such inadequate and one-sided conceptions that other aspects of this truth, equally important and essential, are often overlooked and tacitly denied. How many, for example, would be capable of giving a simple exposition of the following texts: "Who hat/i saved us" (2 Tim. 1:9), "Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling’ (Phil. 2:12), "Now is our salvation nearer than when we believed’ (Rom. 13:11). Now those verses do not refer to three different salvations, but to three separate aspects of one, and unless we learn to distinguish sharply among them, there can be naught but confusion and cloudiness in our thinking. Those passages present three distinct phases and stages of salvation: salvation as an accomplished fact, as a present process, and as a future prospect.
So many today ignore these distinctions, jumbling them together. Some contend for one and some argue against the other two; and vice versa. Some insist they are already saved, and deny that they are now being saved. Some declare that salvation is entirely future, and deny that it is in any sense already accomplished. Both are wrong. The fact is that the great majority of professing Christians fail to see that "salvation" is one of the most comprehensive terms in all the Scriptures, including predestination, regeneration, justification, sanctification, and glorification. They have far too cramped an idea of the meaning and scope of the word "salvation" (as it is used in the Scriptures), narrowing its range too much, generally confining their thoughts to but a simple phase. They suppose "salvation" means no more than the new birth or the forgiveness of sins. Were one to tell them that salvation is a protracted process, they would view him with suspicion; and if he affirmed that salvation is something awaiting us in the future, they would at once dub him a heretic. Yet they would be the ones to err.
Ask the average Christian, Are you saved? and he answers, Yes, I was saved in such and such a year; and that is as far as his thoughts on the subject go. Ask him, To what do you owe your salvation? and "the finished work of Christ" is the sum of his reply. Tell him that each of those answers is seriously defective, and he strongly resents your aspersion. As an example of the confusion that now prevails, we quote the following from a tract on Philippians 2:12: "To whom are those instructions addressed? The opening words to the Epistle tell us: ‘To the saints in Christ Jesus.’ . . . Thus they were all believers! and could not be required to work for their salvation, for they already possessed it." Alas that so few people today perceive anything wrong in such a statement. Another "Bible teacher" tells us that "save thyself" (1 Tim. 4:16) must refer to deliverance from physical ills, as Timothy was already saved spiritually. True, yet it is equally true that he was then in the process of being saved, and also a fact that his salvation was then future.
Let us now supplement the first three verses quoted and show that there are other passages in the New Testament which definitely refer to each distinct tense of salvation. First salvation is an accomplished fact: "Thy faith hath saved thee" (Luke 7:50); "by grace ye have been saved" (Greek, and so translated in the R. V.—Eph. 2:8); "according to his mercy he saved us" (Titus 3:5). Second, salvation as a present process, in course of accomplishment; not yet completed: "Unto us which are being saved" (1 Cor. 1:18—R. V. and Bagster Interlinear); "Them that believe to the saving (not the ‘salvation’) of the soul" (Heb. 10:39). Third, salvation as a future process: "Sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation" (Heb. 1:14); "receive with meekness the engrafted Word, which is able to save your souls" (James. 1:21); "kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation, ready to be revealed in the last time" (1 Pet. 1:5). Thus, by putting together these different passages we are clearly warranted in formulating the following statement: every genuine Christian has been saved, is now being saved, and will yet be saved—how and from what we shall endeavor to show.
As further proof of how many-sided is the subject of God’s great salvation, and how that in Scripture it is viewed from various angles, take the following: by grace are ye saved" (Eph. 2:8); "saved by his (Christ’s) life," i.e., by His resurrection life (Rom. 5:9); "thy faith hath saved thee" (Luke 7:50); "the engrafted Word which is able to save your souls" (James 1:21); "saved by hope" (Rom. 8:24); "saved; yet so as by fire" (1 Cor. 3:15); "the like figure whereunto baptism doth also now save us" (1 Pet. 3:21). Ah, my reader, the Bible is not a lazy man’s book, nor can it be soundly expounded by those who do not devote the whole of their time, and that for years, to its prayerful study. It is not that God would bewilder us, but that He would humble us, drive us to our knees, make us dependent upon His Spirit. Not to the proud—those who are wise in their own esteem—are its heavenly secrets opened.
In like manner it may be shown from Scripture that the cause of salvation is not a single one, as so many suppose—the blood of Christ. Here, too, it is necessary to distinguish between things which differ. First, the originating cause of salvation is the eternal purpose of God, or, in other words, the predestinating grace of the Father. Second, the meritorious cause of salvation is the mediation of Christ, this having particular respect to the legal side of things, or, in other words, His fully meeting the demands of the Law on the behalf and in the stead of those He redeems. Third, the efficient cause of salvation is the regenerating and sanctifying operations of the Holy Spirit, which respect the experimental side of it; or, in other words, the Spirit works in us what Christ purchased for us. Thus, we owe our personal salvation equally to each Person in the Trinity, and not to one (the Son) more than to the others. Fourth, the instrumental cause is our faith, obedience, and perseverance: though we are not saved because of them, equally true is it that we cannot be saved (according to God’s appointment) without them.
In the opening paragraph, we have stated that in our earlier effort we erred as to the starting point. In writing upon a threefold salvation we began with salvation from the penalty of sin, which is our justification. But our salvation does not begin there, as we knew well enough even then: alas that we so blindly followed our erring preceptors. Our salvation originates, of course, in the eternal purpose of God, in His predestinating of us to everlasting glory. "Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began" (2 Tim. 1:9). That has reference to God’s decree of election: His chosen people were then saved completely, in the Divine purpose, and all that we shall now say has to do with the performing of that purpose, the accomplishing of that decree, the actualization of that salvation."


I'm told I can't link to outside sources yet so if anyone has an interest the whole article can be found at PBministries.org, by going to the Pink archive/files/articles and clicking on "A Fourfold Salvation".

Much Christian love to all,
jer3119
 

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That was quite nice. Refreshing.
I've always felt uncomfortable hearing people cite a time & place of their salvation. I would think to say "When God placed me in Christ before the foundation of the world." if asked.
I remember being about 3&1/2 yrs old & listening to a sermon in Catholic church. I remember hearing that God created everything because He loves us. It "clicked", I mean it made so much sense that it resonated with my whole being. I was struck with the profound simplicity of it. It made everything make sense.
The next Sunday, as we stood listening to the scripture reading before sitting for the sermon, I grabbed my mom's dress & yanked on it to get her attention. I pointed toward the front where the man in the shiny robes next to all the candles did all the talkin'. "Is that God?", I asked.
Mom was tryin' to shush me, while someone whispered loudly,"No he just likes to think he is!" Snickering all around, but it made me mad. The most important question I'd ever asked was ignored & made grist for the joke mill.
On my 4th birthday, I was layin' in the grass lookin' up at a large puffy cloud hangin' almost alone in a clear blue sky, above our house. I watched the distant air currents shift the "lace" around the edge of the cloud. I watched shiny black crows, big as our chihuahua, land in the huge, gnarly oak trees at the end of our street. I was thinkin' how perfectly wonderful everything is & how special I felt, being able to wonder at & appreciate it all.
Just then, our chihuahua walked up, surveying her domain, protecting her charge(me), and looking like "queen of all she surveyed". I had to laugh at the huge feelings in such a tiny animal, and that made me think of myself. I thought as magnificent as this little dog is, I am even more blessed, knowing the source of creation & my being.
Just then a big breeze stirred up behind me, blowing over me, gently making every single blade of grass seem to bow in worship, and every blade reflected a highlight of sunshine that ran up its spine as it bowed. I felt a great peace & joy well up in me. I felt overwhelmed by the love of God.:cool:
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That was quite nice. Refreshing.
I've always felt uncomfortable hearing people cite a time & place of their salvation. I would think to say "When God placed me in Christ before the foundation of the world." if asked.
I remember being about 3&1/2 yrs old & listening to a sermon in Catholic church. I remember hearing that God created everything because He loves us. It "clicked", I mean it made so much sense that it resonated with my whole being. I was struck with the profound simplicity of it. It made everything make sense.
The next Sunday, as we stood listening to the scripture reading before sitting for the sermon, I grabbed my mom's dress & yanked on it to get her attention. I pointed toward the front where the man in the shiny robes next to all the candles did all the talkin'. "Is that God?", I asked.
Mom was tryin' to shush me, while someone whispered loudly,"No he just likes to think he is!" Snickering all around, but it made me mad. The most important question I'd ever asked was ignored & made grist for the joke mill.
On my 4th birthday, I was layin' in the grass lookin' up at a large puffy cloud hangin' almost alone in a clear blue sky, above our house. I watched the distant air currents shift the "lace" around the edge of the cloud. I watched shiny black crows, big as our chihuahua, land in the huge, gnarly oak trees at the end of our street. I was thinkin' how perfectly wonderful everything is & how special I felt, being able to wonder at & appreciate it all.
Just then, our chihuahua walked up, surveying her domain, protecting her charge(me), and looking like "queen of all she surveyed". I had to laugh at the huge feelings in such a tiny animal, and that made me think of myself. I thought as magnificent as this little dog is, I am even more blessed, knowing the source of creation & my being.
Just then a big breeze stirred up behind me, blowing over me, gently making every single blade of grass seem to bow in worship, and every blade reflected a highlight of sunshine that ran up its spine as it bowed. I felt a great peace & joy well up in me. I felt overwhelmed by the love of God.:cool:
Dear Rick Otto:

Thanks for the encouragement, and also for the remembrances of the Spirit's stirrings of life, as I term them, in your soul as a child. I can remember similar experiences as a small child too but my memory of such things is not as clear and crisp, for the most part, as yours.

When you spoke of your "most important question" making you mad and it being made grist for the joke mill it brought to mind several things. One of the first was when I "was being prepared for baptism", or what ever term was used in the baptist church in which I was "baptized with a baptism made" with (not "without", and that was the problem) "hands". It was the typical dead Armenian baptist church in which rituals, protestant rituals, such as the one I was about to undergo, were much revered and instilled with a "superstitious efficacy", while Roman Catholic rituals are scoffed at as empty and vain. Oh how blind we are until the Spirit opens the eyes!

Well, though in hindsight I was not yet saved, yet I was under the strivings of the Spirit, much like Edwards was, I believe, at age 8 when for several months he was much occupied with the things of God and everyone seemed to think he had been converted, but of which time he later wrote otherwise when, older, (41 as I recall), wiser, and having then the benefit of the experience of two genuine "outpourings of the Spirit" on the church which he Pastored (such as have been few in number and power in the history of the church) as well as his own true conversion at about age 20, he plainly stated: "there was nothing of a saving nature in it".

Edwards, a deep analytical thinker, and gifted observer of both outward and inward phenomena and facts, spent most of his life and ministry thinking and writing about the nature of those two experiences and how to tell the true from the false.

He believed, as I do, that this is a subject much neglected in the ordinary teaching of the church. How fascinating it was for me to read that in Edwards case, when the Lord finally did convert him, the point of contention was the doctrine of Election/Predestination, which Edwards, raised in a Puritan home of godly parents, whose father pastored the same church for 60 years, in Edwards own words; "hated". Yes, Edwards hated the doctrine of Election/Predestination until the Spirit came and taught him the truth of it. Don't we all?

Edwards says that when he had been thus instructed and taught the Truth of the matter it was above all doctrines one he loved. Such is the work of the Spirit.

But Edwards had to learn to apply this in his own ministry, as well as his life and personal theology. For it seems that it was not until he came out from under the influence of certain family members, some of whom hated this doctrine, and Edwards paid the price of separation and rejection that it always brings from those we love and desire that they love us, that Edwards saw the fruit of it born in his ministry.

In his works (BOT edition) he states that it was the clear preaching of the Doctrine of Justification by Faith alone, along with several other sermons, one on Ruth as I recall, against the considerable animosity of those family members, not to mention other man centered influences, that the Spirit was poured out on his Church and the great awakening of 1737 began.

When the Lord did finally call me with power, there were many scriptures brought to mind and heart with great power. They would sound in my mind and spirit with strength, relish, wonder and amazement, and occupy my thinking for hours and days at a time, much like Bunyan speaks of in his "Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners", and Edward relates of, but more briefly in his "Personal Narrative" .

Verses like the parable of the Ten Virgins, riveted my attention, and I had to know what they meant, deeply, what each word implied and spoke of. On the surface it seemed obvious, but it was exactly contrary to nearly everything I had been taught.

Who would I believe? The Words of Christ, for such they were, as He Himself spoke them, or the words of men, who had explained away these mysterious things? It seemed that He was speaking to me, but I had been told that He doesn't do that anymore. Yes, there is a Holy Spirit, I had been told, and He still teaches, BUT, "you got all the Holy Spirit you're going to get at salvation", and you won't "feel anything", and you won't realize His presence, etc, etc.. And thus was minimized and explained away the great and wonderful "Promise of the Father", the "advent of the Spirit" which alone makes the "advent of Christ real".

To complicate the whole matter, having spent many years in a Dispensational Church, the Old Testament, not to mention the Gospels, being "for the Jews" were almost totally ignored.

But The Spirit had "better things" planned for me, and took me to the precious, precious, precious Gospel of John, and showed me Christ's words about His Spirit coming and how, in Christ's High Priestly Prayer, the night before He was crucified, He assured not only his disciples, the twelve, that they would be the recipient of these things, but that He also said,

"Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;"

and so each and every thing He prayed for with respect to the Spirit and the manifestation, yes, manifestation, "...and I will love Him and manifest myself to him.", of Himself to believers, today, is true (John 14:20-27 and ff). The problem, of course is all the false teaching that surrounds these things, for Christ had conditioned such manifestation on Love of Him in the keeping of the Commandments, on living a holy life.

Well, steeped deeply in dispensational error about "the Commandments", the Moral and Civil Law, it took a while for the Lord to unteach all that error, not because of any lack of power in Him of course, but because of my "slow and dull to believe heart". But unteach it He did, at least some of it, and He used men like Edwards, who was also much taken with the great warnings of the Lord in the Parable of the Ten Virgins.

Oh dear, I see I have wandered as is so often the case from what I had wanted to share with you about the leading of children astray by false teaching. Please forgive me, it is a bad habit. I'll try to make it quick.

What I had thought of, specifically, when you spoke of the incident wherein your interest in the Reality of God and Who He Is was slighted, was Edward Paysons teachings on how children are lead astray.

Payson, another unusually godly man who was not afraid to put scripture over party influences or family connections, or other forms of personal pride or desire, wrote several sermons about the place of Children coming to Christ and the responsibility of parents. I had read a number of Puritan works on this, and while they are good as far as they go, they tended to put all, or most, of the blame for problems on the children without addressing fully the parental and worldly influences on those children. But I have never felt that the scriptural balance is maintained by this approach, however comforting it is to the pride of the adults who teach it.

Payson, of course, does not ignore the doctrine of total depravity for he as I, loved this truth as absolutely central. Rather, he opens up this doctrine in the light of scriptures revelation of it's use by the "god of this world" to lead children astray. Several of my favorites are found at PBministries.org under Paysons sermons numbers 72-76, I think. One is titled "How Little Children are Prevented From Coming to Christ". The Link is here:

http://www.pbministries.org/articles/payson/the_works_vol_3/sermon_73.htm

There I did it without too many more "rabbit trails".

Thanks for putting up with my ramblings and for sharing what "the Lord has done for your soul", Rick Otto.

Much Christian love,
In Him,
jer3119
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟49,309.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I believe you should be able to edit the posting and add the link, now.

I remember the time early on when the light came on for me and I received Jesus Christ as my Lord & Savior. It was so confusing at the time for a child of 9 that I've only mentioned it a couple of times. When I did so, everything I was around or experienced, even what I did, seemed dark and downright corrupt for a number of days. I couldn't figure out what it was. Sometimes the world seemed visibly dark.

I've guessed now years later that when new life came, everything around me -- even things I did -- seemed that much deader. I've noticed this happens with others, too, and it makes new Christians a little anxious 'til they connect the fact: we Christians aren't made sinless by accepting Jesus. At least that's how I came down to view it.
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟32,608.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I felt overwhelmed by the love of God.:cool:
Very cool, Rick.

I have similar memories..... one was long ago, in a small town in west Texas where we lived. My Dad left me in the car in a car seat (early '60s, so must have been very young) at night while he went into a neighbor's house. For a moment I felt scared, but then this strange peace came to me that even then I understood to be God letting me know He was watching over me..... always stuck with me. Another was on my 4th b'day in '63, just remember standing in the front yard looking out over the summer evening beauty and realizing it was created by the hand of God. And another the fall of '64 at a high school football game, a kid about 3 (I was 5) had got seperated from his parents and was crying, and all the older kids were laughing at him. I wasn't commonly the most compassionate kid, but for some reason it got to me, and I took him to my Dad who found his parents. That kid was very grateful to me, and afterward I had this feeling that God was pleased with my actions, and it felt very good.

Funny how those things have been as important to me in my Christian walk as any other experiences. I believe that they are signposts the Lord gives us to remember His faithfulness by.

Brad
 
Upvote 0

Salamon

Regular Member
Dec 16, 2006
326
24
Hmm.... Where do I live??
✟30,581.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Hello all, thanks for starting this topic jer3119 I think it is good to recollect the things that show God working in our lives. It is further testament to Gods awesome grace:)
I can remember vividly some of the wonderful sunsets, and sunrises from Yuma, AZ and how they all the time amazed me(and still do) about how awesome our God is to have created them and everything else in this world.
I can remember some of the same things as you guys have mentioned like getting lost in stores and God giving me peace in those times.
I can remember events where God has spared my life where I could have easily been killed or crippled and leaving with only my heart racing.
These experiences and many more like them are very evident in our lives and I think it is cool that we can share them so we can all, together praise God for them.

PS-Do we have a thanksgiving thread here where we can share our praises to God and give testament to what he has done for us recently and in the past? And if we don't would it be a good idea to start one?:confused:
 
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That got me thinking.

Bradford,
It's nice to hear from somebody else with memories that early. I don't even remember the last time I've heard anyone else with a memory that early.
And your right about it being a sign of His faithfulness.
Having that experienced grounded me in a sense of peace about being me that otherwise could've easily been stolen by intense & rowdy older siblings and even more intense parochial school. I realy NEEDED to remember His faithfulness.
 
Upvote 0

cubanito

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2005
2,680
222
Southeast Florida, US (Coral Gables near Miami)
✟4,071.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
One can be saved from a variety of things.

God saves even the lost from all manner of evil on a daily basis (does not the sun rise on the just and the unjust?). By the judicious use of force, policemen save pople from criminals, firefighters save cats from trees, and so on.

Even whe limiting "salvation" to that effected by Christ, it has various facets. We are saved by God FROM God's just wrath. We are saved by God from ourselves. He in some sense saves the nation Israel even when the majority of them clearly did not put their trust in Him, and so on.

Also, God is Eternal, but is also able to act and perceive temporally. Thus from one of God's perspectives, my salvation was an accomplished feat from before the foundation of the worlds. From another perspective, it is a future event to occur after my death. Another perspective informs me that it occured at a specific moment in time some 30 years ago; and even further it is something that happens to me moment by moment.

Emotionally I relate all these complementary truths by the song that goes, "I feel it coming in the air tonight, oh Lord. I've been waiting for this moment for all my life." A song which always provokes tears in me.

From my limited understanding, Reformed theologians generally cope with some of this by drawing the distinction between salvation, justification and sanctification. In a simplistic way, it might be said that at the Cross God made possible for some to be justified, an occurence that from our perspective occurs at a definite point in time (although we might be so young that our memory fails an exact recollection) However, while this immediately makes our spirit one with Him, it leaves us a life-long incremental process of sanctification, whereby our minds are renewed to a better understanding, and our flesh increasingly purged of sin. Sanctification is a process that is not completed for the mind until death, and for the whole person until after resurrection of the flesh.

Like so much else about theology, it is not necessary, often not even important, that the Christian understand the fine points of all this.

What is important is that we glimpse how completely reliant we are on Him for everything, and that not just merely assenting to the Truth of His Sovereignty, that we truly enjoy our dependent status. Of little use is the kind of faith James writes of which even the demons possess, as they know of and fear God, but do not willingly bow in ravished pleasure at Him.

I remember well "the hour I first believed." I sat in front of a mentally retarded teenager, comptemptous in my usual arrogance of him, and saw/felt Someone with Him, a Peace and Love from that idiotic boy, that I had never experienced before. At that moment I wanted to trade everything I knew, all my vaunted IQ as well as any of the other qualities for which I prided myself, for just a piece of what that retard had. For a moment, there was no pride, no self-conciousness, nothing but a hunger for "something" (Someone) I did not even know. I am crying again. I can't remember that night without tears. God Loved me. Nothing, no one (especially myself) mattered. God Loved ME. There was no reason for it, nothing I could offer, I wanted Him. He Graciously condescended to have me. This wasn't about the proper theological terms, this was a very personal moment of Love from the Father to one of His errant childrem (me).

So was His Love Irresitable? Did I make a choice? Did it happen in the distant past on the outskirst of Jerusalem, or 30 years ago, or does it happen every day, or will it yet be in the future?

I do not believe there really is a difference. I am certain if there is a difference, it dosen't matter.

God Loved me. God saved/saves/will save me. I chose Him. Pretentions to put these matters into neat little boxes, labeled with precisely defined human words strike me as just a little bit arrogant on our parts. God's thoughts are higher than our thoughts, and I do not believe that either human language nor human logic can precisely nail down these matters. It's a fine excercise. And it is greatly useful to set boundaries beyond which Scripture forbids us go. But we should be careful that in our zeal to avoid heresy, we do not fall into the heresy of limiting God.

God is God.

Reformed theology often forgets that simple fact: God is God, and human language/thought can never encompass Him fully

JR
 
Upvote 0

cubanito

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2005
2,680
222
Southeast Florida, US (Coral Gables near Miami)
✟4,071.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
CS Lewis puts it this way in his autobiography re converson Surprised by Joy "Freedom, or necessity? Or do they differ at their maximum? At that maximum a man is what he does; there is nothing of him left over or outside the act. As for what we commonly call Will, and what we commonly call Emotion, I fancy these tlak too loud, protest too much, to be quite believed, and we have a secret suspicion that the great passion or the iron resolution is partly a put-up job."

JR
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
One can be saved from a variety of things.

God saves even the lost from all manner of evil on a daily basis (does not the sun rise on the just and the unjust?). By the judicious use of force, policemen save pople from criminals, firefighters save cats from trees, and so on.

Even whe limiting "salvation" to that effected by Christ, it has various facets. We are saved by God FROM God's just wrath. We are saved by God from ourselves. He in some sense saves the nation Israel even when the majority of them clearly did not put their trust in Him, and so on.

Also, God is Eternal, but is also able to act and perceive temporally. Thus from one of God's perspectives, my salvation was an accomplished feat from before the foundation of the worlds. From another perspective, it is a future event to occur after my death. Another perspective informs me that it occured at a specific moment in time some 30 years ago; and even further it is something that happens to me moment by moment.

Emotionally I relate all these complementary truths by the song that goes, "I feel it coming in the air tonight, oh Lord. I've been waiting for this moment for all my life." A song which always provokes tears in me.

From my limited understanding, Reformed theologians generally cope with some of this by drawing the distinction between salvation, justification and sanctification. In a simplistic way, it might be said that at the Cross God made possible for some to be justified, an occurence that from our perspective occurs at a definite point in time (although we might be so young that our memory fails an exact recollection) However, while this immediately makes our spirit one with Him, it leaves us a life-long incremental process of sanctification, whereby our minds are renewed to a better understanding, and our flesh increasingly purged of sin. Sanctification is a process that is not completed for the mind until death, and for the whole person until after resurrection of the flesh.

Like so much else about theology, it is not necessary, often not even important, that the Christian understand the fine points of all this.

What is important is that we glimpse how completely reliant we are on Him for everything, and that not just merely assenting to the Truth of His Sovereignty, that we truly enjoy our dependent status. Of little use is the kind of faith James writes of which even the demons possess, as they know of and fear God, but do not willingly bow in ravished pleasure at Him.

I remember well "the hour I first believed." I sat in front of a mentally retarded teenager, comptemptous in my usual arrogance of him, and saw/felt Someone with Him, a Peace and Love from that idiotic boy, that I had never experienced before. At that moment I wanted to trade everything I knew, all my vaunted IQ as well as any of the other qualities for which I prided myself, for just a piece of what that retard had. For a moment, there was no pride, no self-conciousness, nothing but a hunger for "something" (Someone) I did not even know. I am crying again. I can't remember that night without tears. God Loved me. Nothing, no one (especially myself) mattered. God Loved ME. There was no reason for it, nothing I could offer, I wanted Him. He Graciously condescended to have me. This wasn't about the proper theological terms, this was a very personal moment of Love from the Father to one of His errant childrem (me).

So was His Love Irresitable? Did I make a choice? Did it happen in the distant past on the outskirst of Jerusalem, or 30 years ago, or does it happen every day, or will it yet be in the future?

I do not believe there really is a difference. I am certain if there is a difference, it dosen't matter.

God Loved me. God saved/saves/will save me. I chose Him. Pretentions to put these matters into neat little boxes, labeled with precisely defined human words strike me as just a little bit arrogant on our parts. God's thoughts are higher than our thoughts, and I do not believe that either human language nor human logic can precisely nail down these matters. It's a fine excercise. And it is greatly useful to set boundaries beyond which Scripture forbids us go. But we should be careful that in our zeal to avoid heresy, we do not fall into the heresy of limiting God.

God is God.

Reformed theology often forgets that simple fact: God is God, and human language/thought can never encompass Him fully

JR
I certainly agree with your observation of the need to recognize that "anyone that thinks that he knows anything, does not yet know as he ought to know", and that we "see darkly" now. I also agree that the subjective witness of God to the soul is much over looked and under rated, for the scriptures give it much greater prominence that the vast majority of human teachers, but I believe that is because few, but not all teachers, have believed and experienced much of those scriptures.

But to say "it doesn't matter" with respect to correct doctrine seems to over state the case a bit, for we are told to "study it to show thyself approved unto God, rightly dividing the Word of Truth". In my view the problems, as always, lie in unmortified pride and incomplete dependence upon His Spirit for understanding.

True understanding is not merely natural, but rather is an amalgamation of natural and supernatural understanding. We must do our part in hard work and study, and also ask Him for His divine light, or as Paul prayed for his Ephesian friends, that God would grant them a "Spirit of Wisdom and Revelation in the True Knowledge of Him".

The answer is not one of "either/or" but, as the scriptures teach, one of "all of the above". It is the either/or approach that has gotten us into trouble.

Take for example 1Jn, a book that starts off by telling us it is written for the purpose of helping it's readers enjoy the same "fellowship with the Father and the Son" that John and the apostles enjoyed (in kind, perhaps, if not degree). John then goes on to reveal the actions, subjective experiences, and doctrines, that one should look for in themselves in order to realize that objective. Actions, subjective experiences, doctrines: thinking, feeling, doing, according to scripture; all of which result in "fellowship with the Father and the Son".

Much Christian Love,

jer3119
 
Upvote 0

cubanito

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2005
2,680
222
Southeast Florida, US (Coral Gables near Miami)
✟4,071.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Correct doctrine DOES matter.

However, on some points, especially among Presby circles, we go beyond the Biblical facts, and using human reason extrapolate to areas we should not. In the urge to systematize everything, I think we go too far. It is better to say "we do not know" than to push for an answer which is not clear from Scripture.

It comes down to how much value one gives human reason. Some go so far as to deify logic and identify it with the Logos of John's Gospel. I do not agree. I do not believe God is limited by the "rules of logic." In that I can be accused of being irrational.

None of this however is what I meant by "it dosen't matter." What I meant was that God does not require great understanding or super-duper correct doctrine for salvation to occur. It certainly matters to try and grow in the understanding of doctrine, but very often God will effect salvation using the minimalist understanding by a person.

Justification and salvation lead to a process of sanctification, and this is based upon sound doctrine to the mind as much as a spiritual basis. But salvation is not sanctification, and often can be achieved with astonishingly poor doctrinal basis. For salvation, a great deal of doctrinal purity is required, it doesn't matter. For growing in God's plan (sanctification) doctrine matters a great deal indeed.

JR
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Correct doctrine DOES matter.

However, on some points, especially among Presby circles, we go beyond the Biblical facts, and using human reason extrapolate to areas we should not. In the urge to systematize everything, I think we go too far. It is better to say "we do not know" than to push for an answer which is not clear from Scripture.

It comes down to how much value one gives human reason. Some go so far as to deify logic and identify it with the Logos of John's Gospel. I do not agree. I do not believe God is limited by the "rules of logic." In that I can be accused of being irrational.

None of this however is what I meant by "it dosen't matter." What I meant was that God does not require great understanding or super-duper correct doctrine for salvation to occur. It certainly matters to try and grow in the understanding of doctrine, but very often God will effect salvation using the minimalist understanding by a person.

Justification and salvation lead to a process of sanctification, and this is based upon sound doctrine to the mind as much as a spiritual basis. But salvation is not sanctification, and often can be achieved with astonishingly poor doctrinal basis. For salvation, a great deal of doctrinal purity is required, it doesn't matter. For growing in God's plan (sanctification) doctrine matters a great deal indeed.

JR
Well put in all points, and I share your concern with the over emphasis of man's wisdom in some circles. It is indeed a problem which God has made clear in the scriptures, and none are immune from it; even Paul had to have a "thorn in his flesh" given to keep him from being conceited "because of the surpassing greatness of the revelations" that were vouchsafed to him.

We turn, by our remaining old nature, even the greatest spiritual gifts and revelations of truth into a source of pride it seems, and the more we realize this, the more "we groan" to be freed from "this body of death".

Thank you for your thoughts on this,
with much Christian love, may you have a Christmas blessed by His manifested presence in your heart,
in Him,
jer3119
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Before the foundation of the world :)
Not really, for the scriptures say I was "chosen in Him", "before the foundation of the World", not at all that I was saved before the foundation of the world.

Much had yet to be accomplished by the Son in Justification and Redemption, and by the Spirit in Calling, Regeneration, Illumination, and Sanctification and Glorification, after, the Father "chose me, in Him, before the foundation of the world".

It is not good to "add to" nor to "take from" "what is written", and the "means" God has chosen to display His Glory in Grace and Mercy to the sons of men is important and not to be slighted.

These are things "the angels desire to look into" to be instructed, and it is not good to glibly brush aside what glorious beings as the angels, created a little higher than man, desire to look into, for instruction.

In Christ's Love,
jer3119
 
Upvote 0

Iosias

Senior Contributor
Jul 18, 2004
8,171
227
✟9,648.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Not really, for the scriptures say I was "chosen in Him", "before the foundation of the World", not at all that I was saved before the foundation of the world.

Read section 5 of this. :)

The issue is the timing of justification, I think we ought to differentiate between objective and subjective justification to say that we were objectively justified in eternity in Christ, we were justified in Christ at the cross who was "raised for our justification" and we are justified subjectively in our conscience in time when we believe.
 
Upvote 0

jer3119

Active Member
Dec 7, 2006
136
20
✟22,861.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Read section 5 of this. :)

The issue is the timing of justification, I think we ought to differentiate between objective and subjective justification to say that we were objectively justified in eternity in Christ, we were justified in Christ at the cross who was "raised for our justification" and we are justified subjectively in our conscience in time when we believe.
No thank you. I don't know what "this" is, but I do know the difference between being "chosen before the foundation of the world", it's being worked out in the life in conversion. Pink has a good piece on this, which I have already posted part of in this thread. Have you read it?.

Furthermore, based on what I have read of your reasoning in debates with Cignus, though in places you make some good points, as in your observations as to the dishonesty of BOT in disguising the extent of their editing of Pink's Sov of God, I believe you have yet a good deal to learn about how to put what you know into good practice. Thus, I would be unlikely to read "this", especially since you have not taken the time to explain what it is, but rather have assumed that because you have provided it, it must be worth reading.

As I said, no thank you. In view of all of the above, and in view of the wonderful and excellent things I do now have to read and for which I don't have as much time as I would like, I must decline your "suggestion", or was it a directive?

With much Christian love my friend,
in Him
jer3119
 
  • Like
Reactions: cygnusx1
Upvote 0

Iosias

Senior Contributor
Jul 18, 2004
8,171
227
✟9,648.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Pink has a good piece on this...

Indeed he does and he agrees with me:


Above, we have pointed out that from the viewpoint of God’s eternal decrees the question "Who are the ones whom God justifies?" must be "the elect." And this brings us to a point on which some eminent Calvinists have erred, or at least, have expressed themselves faultily. Some of the older theologians, when expounding this doctrine, contended for the eternal justification of the elect, affirming that God pronounced them righteous before the foundation of the world, and that their justification was then actual and complete, remaining so throughout their history in time, even during the days of their unregeneracy and unbelief; and that the only difference their faith made was in making manifest God’s eternal justification in their consciences. This is a serious mistake, resulting (again) from failure to distinguish between things which differ.

As an immanent act of God’s mind, in which all things (which are to us past, present, and future) were cognized by Him, the elect might be said to be justified from all eternity. And, as an immutable act of God’s will, which cannot be frustrated, the same may be predicated again. But as an actual, formal, historical sentence, pronounced by God upon us, not so. We must distinguish between God’s looking upon the elect in the purpose of his grace, and the objects of justification lying under the sentence of the law: in the former, He loved His people with an everlasting love (Jer. 31:3); in the latter, we were "by nature the children of wrath, even as others" (Eph. 2:3). Until they believe, every descendant of Adam is "condemned already" (John 3:18), and to be under God’ condemnation is the very opposite of being justified.

In his ponderous treatise on justification, the Puritan Thomas Goodwin made clear some vital distinctions, which if carefully observed will preserve us from error on this point. "1. In the everlasting covenant. We may say of all spiritual blessings in Christ, what is said of Christ Himself, that their ‘goings forth are from everlasting.’ Justified then we were when first elected, though not in our own persons, yet in our Head (Eph. 1:3). 2. There is a farther act of justifying us, which passed from God towards us in Christ, upon His payment and performance at His resurrection (Rom. 4:25, 1 Tim. 3:16). 3. But these two acts of justification are wholly out of us, immanent acts in God, and though they concern us and are towards us, yet not acts of God upon us, they being performed towards us not as actually existing in ourselves, but only as existing in our Head, who covenanted for us and represented us: so as though by those acts we are estated into a right and title to justification, yet the benefit and possession of that estate we have not without a farther act being passed upon us." Before regeneration we are justified by existing in our Head only, as a feoffee (one who is given a grant), held in trust for us, as children under age. In addition to which, we "are to be in our own persons, though still through Christ, possessed of it, and to have all the deeds and evidences of it committed to the custody and apprehension of our faith. We are in our own persons made true owners and enjoyers of it, which is immediately done at that instant when we first believe; which act (of God) is the completion and accomplishment of the former two, and is that grand and famous justification by faith which the Scripture so much inculcates—note the ‘now’ in Romans 5:9, 11; 8:11... God doth judge and pronounce His elect ungodly and unjustified till they believe" (Ibid.)

http://www.pbministries.org/books/pink/Justification/just_07.htm
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Read section 5 of this. :)

The issue is the timing of justification, I think we ought to differentiate between objective and subjective justification to say that we were objectively justified in eternity in Christ, we were justified in Christ at the cross who was "raised for our justification" and we are justified subjectively in our conscience in time when we believe.

that may be true , but the question isn't "when were you justified ?" ....... it was ...
When Were You "Saved"?
 
Upvote 0