Lost Witness
Ezekiel 3:3 ("Change")
- Nov 10, 2022
- 1,694
- 977
- 38
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
It is what you make out of this "Last Saints" concept which is questioned - all the significance you.I will not "dispute" about there being Last Saints.
Why is "Last Saints" necessary for me to accept the Fourth Beast is the Christian kingdom in Daniel 7?If you cannot understand this reality do not pretend it's because you need to climb into my head.
Which you cannot clearly teach without someone supposing many other things you assert.Rather... you need to determine WHAT the Gospel teaches about the Last Saints.
The Bible teaches of Last Saints AFTER the Great Commission.
I am sorry that is "news" to you.
Is this a part of Amillennialism's concept?He does this because of his belief in Amillennialism
I see."Like post-millennialism, amillennialism believes that the thousand
years is a figurative number indicating a long period of time and
that Jesus will return after the thousand years is over.
amillennialism believes that the thousand years has already started.
Thanks.Beginning with the first coming of Jesus and the establishment of
the NT church the reign of Christ in victory through the invisible
church has already begun."
What are the differences between the different millenialisms?
Revelation 20:1-6 tells of 1000 years in which Christ will reign. I've heard there are different views on this 1000 years, mainly premillenialism, postmillenialism, and amillenialism. What are thechristianity.stackexchange.com
He uses the parable "the kingdom of Heaven is like" to claim Daniels
4 main beasts is realy church history and not "Kingdoms of men".
He uses Daniel 12:4 and 8-10 to claim he knows the spiritual truth of these things.
His first kingdom of Heaven on earth is Daniels first beast. The second kingdom started
after the flood. Thus, he pretty much rejects the physical fulfillment of Gods prophies.
You seem to be saying that the Beast in Revelation IS the Great Tribulation.5thKingdom said:
The Scripture is clear:
The Revelation Beast (the Great Tribulation) BEGINS after the Last Saint is "sealed" (saved).
There are four verses there. I do not see the phrase "Last Saints" in any of them.First... the Bible is clear, there are Last Saints living when the Lord Returns [1 Co 15:50-53]
Secondly.... I will leave it up to you to determine WHAT "sealed" represents... but you NOT knowing proves nothing.
Did you really imagine that the Great Commission (saving "His Sheep") would not come to an END? Really?
But WHY does that indicate anything about "Last Saints?"Rev 7:1-3
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth,
that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. And I saw another angel ascending from the east,
having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,
Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.
He uses the parable "the kingdom of Heaven is like" to claim Daniels
4 main beasts is realy church history and not "Kingdoms of men".
He uses Daniel 12:4 and 8-10 to claim he knows the spiritual truth of these things.
His first kingdom of Heaven on earth is Daniels first beast. The second kingdom started
after the flood. Thus, he pretty much rejects the physical fulfillment of Gods prophies.
You seem to be saying that the Beast in Revelation IS the Great Tribulation.
Rather what is taught is that IN the great tribulation there is this beast.
The scope of the great tribulation is larger than the scope of the beast.
Why do you equate one with the other exactly?
There are four verses there. I do not see the phrase "Last Saints" in any of them.
Verse 53 - "For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality."
Okay. But why do I have to see "Last Saints" here?
I will tell you where I have disagreed with you all along.
You appear to take the judgment of the sheep nations and the goat nations in Matthew 25:31-46 as the last judgment.
If I am mistaken, then correct me.
It is what you make out of this "Last Saints" concept which is questioned - all the significance you.
Is knowing about "Last Saints" make it inescapable that the First Beast is the pre-flood kingdom?
Can you show the phrase "Last Saints" ?
Why is "Last Saints" necessary for me to accept the Fourth Beast is the Christian kingdom in Daniel 7?
Which you cannot clearly teach without someone supposing many other things you assert.
Where is the phrase "Last Saints" in Matthew 28:19,20?
"Go therefore and disciple all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
Teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold I am with you all the days until the consummation of the age."
Where in there is the inevitable concept of "Last Saints?"
If his explanation is wrong, I hope beyond this emotional response, you will EXPLAIN why it is wrong.Wrong... it it INTENTIONALLY wrong?
Why in the world would you TALK about the "Kingdom of Heaven"
without KNOWING what it represents in Scripture.
Do some Bible study and stop assuming
your "feelings" matter.
The "tares" in the parable of Matthew 13:24-30 are not consituents of the kingdom of the heavens.The Bible uses the phrase "Kingdom of Heaven" exactly 33 times.
And EVERY TIME it represents:
(1) The Christian Kingdom of "wheat and tares" during the Great Commission BEFORE the Last Saint is "sealed" (saved)
Regardless of when the growth and seperation of the wheat and the tares take place, the tares are gathered OUT OF HIS KINGDOM.(2) The Great Tribulation Kingdom of "wheat and tares" AFTER the Last Saint is saved.
I agree that the reigning ones are not only from the church age.(3) The Eternal Kingdom of ONLY "wheat" from EACH of the previous Kingdoms,
the Pre-Flood Kingdom, the Jewish Kingdom, the Christian Kingdom and the Great Tribulation.
Cheer up.Lesson #1: I have done an exhaustive study and I know EXACTLY what the phrase means in Scripture.
Lesson #2: You have NOT done a study and you have NO IDEA what the phrase means...
and yet you PRETEND that your "feelings" about the matter establishes some truth... LOL
So how can you say on one hand it is closed to everyone, and then turn around and explain the fourth beast isThe Bible PROMISES the TRUTH about Daniel's prophecies remained "closed-up" and "sealed"
to all the Saints until the Last Saints "shall understand" (and preach) the TRUTH at the "Time-of-the-End"
I am sorry you REJECT this Biblical Truth...
or maybe you just reject the idea that the NEW INFORMATION I am preaching
is the Gospel of the Last Saints.
Either way... you cannot REFUTE a single world I have said...
you can only DENY the harmony of Scripture of my Gospel.
You have NO BIBLICAL reason for your rejection.
If his explanation is wrong, I hope beyond this emotional response, you will EXPLAIN why it is wrong.
The "tares" in the parable of Matthew 13:24-30 are not consituents of the kingdom of the heavens.
The kingdom of rhe heavens is that part of the whole kingdom of God from the beginning of the church to the end of the millennium.
And here is proof of the fact that this kingdom of the heavens starts with the initiation of the church:
Thanks for counting 33 times the phrase is used.
That does not mean you well understand the phrase because you counted the number of usages.
I have showed you that this kingdom of the heavens has its beginning at the production of the church.
I mean the KEYS to open it to man were given to Peter when Christ established the church
So how can you say on one hand it is closed to everyone, and then turn around and explain the fourth beast is
not the Roman empire but a Christian kingdom?
I think you are probably thinking the wrong things are closed and sealed up.
The fourth beast is a prophecy you know.
Explain why the prophecy is sealed up to everyone's understanding except YOUR understanding.
No it is not shown to beLOL...
Daniel's Fourth Beast is shown in Scripture as:
(3) the Great Tribulation "Kingdom of Heaven"
If it is over the saints of God than it is not the kingdom of Heaven or the kingdom of the heavens.(4) the RULE of the Anti-Christ over the Last Saints
Why not a revived Roman Empire?(5) DURING Satan's "Little Season"
What I just refutted was that the kingdom of the heavens is the kingdom of the world under the Beast WHOEVER or WHATEVER the beast represents.In other words...
the PEOPLE in each case are the SAME PEOPLE..
the Last Saints LIVING on earth when the Lord Returns.
You cannot REFUTE this from Scripture...
so why DENY it from your "feelings"?
Revelation 11:15 says what it says if I feel good or feel not good.No... and you offer NO SCRIPTURE to support your "feelings"...
therefore you have no Biblical validation.
That is how it works.
That makes some sense.LOL...
I do not need to see the words "Last Saints" in order to know
the Saints LIVING on earth when the Lord Returns (the Saints "changed" in a moment)
are the LAST SAINTS...
I read carefully therough Daniel two and four just hours ago.Why is it so hard for YOU to understand this Truth?
Is the fact that it's NEW INFORMATION to you preventing you from accepting basic facts?
Let's say there are no more saints sanctitified to be saints after the first resurrection and transfiguration.Because the PEOPLE in that verse represent the LAST SAINTS on earth...
why in the world is this hard for you to accept?
No he does not.LOL.. Jesus was very clear [Mat 13] the church consists of BOTH
The sheep of Matthew 25:31-46 are not the WHEAT of Matt. 13:24-30.(1) the saved "wheat/sheep" IN THE CHURCH (sown by Jesus and) destined to eternal life
The TARES are not a part of the church.(2) the unsaved "tares/goats" IN THE CHURCH (sown by Satan and) destined to eternal torment
Wrong you are again. What are the words out of the mouth of Jesus on this?There are NO NATIONS of sheep and goats...
that is just your imagination.
If the tares are sons of the evil one masquerading falsely as the kingdom of the heavens, the church, they are NOT the kingdom of the heavens but a counterfeit, a facade, a deception. It is a decption taking place in the world. The field in which the tares and wheat are growing together is the world. (v. 38).In Matthew 13 the Lord Jesus reveals several different perspectives about the (3rd) New Testament "Kingdom of Heaven".
The Lord reveals [v3-8] the "Kingdom of Heaven" (Christian Kingdom) is like a man sowing seed, and the Christian Gospel
is called [v19] the "Word of the Kingdom". The Lord reveals [v24-30] the "Kingdom of Heaven" (Christian Kingdom) includes
both saved "wheat" (sown by Christ), and unsaved "tares" (sown by Satan). Moreover, these wheat and tares look very similar,
and they are allowed to grow together - until they are separated during the "Final Harvest", which occurs at the "End-of-the-Age".
No it is not shown to be
"Kingdom of Heaven."
If it is a kingdom. Neither its origin, characteristic, or souce is heavenly.
If it is over the saints of God than it is not the kingdom of Heaven or the kingdom of the heavens.
It is in opposition to Gof's administration. It is opposed to God's governement.
So such a monsterous symbol is not of God's adminstrative governing.
Wrong you are again. What are the words out of the mouth of Jesus on this?
"But when the Son of Man comes in His glory . . . at that time He will sit on the throne of His glory.
And ALL THE NATIONS [or Gentiles] will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them from one another, just as the shepherd
separates the sheep from the goats. And He will set the sheep on His right hand and the goats on the left." (Matt. 25:31-33)
If they grow together and are really all part of the church than the church does not EXIST.
If the church is not CALLED OUT of the world then it is not the church.
If you think ANY unbeliever is a member of your church then you do not know what the church is.
The TARES are not a part of the church.
The GOATS or the SHEEP are not a part of the church.
The Sheep are the Church.SHEEP are not a part of the church.
don't get how anyone who's not in the Body of Christ would be in the church?
The Sheep are the Church.