Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ah.....so that's the story you tell yourself.
I've already said (a few times) that I will respond to those when I have the proper time and concentration to do so (but really, I'm not obligated to post anything in response to your demands). This is supposed to be a group discussion.There is a big difference between some of your posts that rely 95% on the opinions of others, and mine, that are 95% to 100% my own thoughts.
I don't want to get into pettiness. Would you please address the scriptural arguments presented?
Be careful whom you call ignorant of scripture. I graduated from seminary and although there were a lot of other guys a whole lot smarter than me, I wouldn't label myself amongst the ignorant crowd. In fact it appears that your knowledge of sin and forgiveness is quite lacking. You are apparently not aware that there is a difference between purification from sin and forgiveness of sin since you cite Numbers 19 which deal with ritual purification rites. To be ritually pure means to be free of some flaw or uncleanness which would bar one from contact with holy objects or places, especially from contact with the holy presence of God in worship. God is the ideal of purity, and those who are to come in contact with God's presence are also to be pure. Examples of ritual uncleanness are:But you show your utter ignorance of the scripture when you say that remission did not come through animal sacrifice.
Numbers 19
"Then a man who is clean shall gather up the ashes of the heifer, and store them outside the camp in a clean place; and they shall be kept for the congregation of the children of Israel for the water of purification; it is for purifying from sin."
Why do you cite Leviticus 4? Are you not aware of the difference between forgiveness and the taking away of sin?? Jesus alone takes away sin; no animal sacrifice is capable of taking away sin. The only thing animal sacrifice does is cover for sin - it DOES NOT TAKE AWAY SIN. Jn 1:29 states "The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! There is not a single verse in either the O.T. or N.T. that states that the blood of an animal takes away sin. That is why the Lamb of God is a perfect and better sacrifice! You have been arguing all along that Jesus fulfilled the animal sacrifices, which is true, yet you appear oblivious to the mechanism by which He did so. The root of the Hebrew word translated “atonement” in the Old Testament is kaphar, which has the idea of “covering,” not total removal. Noah covered/kaphar the ark with pitch. Animal sacrifices were nothing more than a "band-aid" as they covered sin but did not remove sin. That is why the sacrifices in the O.T. continued on an ongoing basis as they covered over sin but did not remove the sins of the people. And that is why Heb 10:4 confirms that it is IMPOSSIBLE for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sin. The words "The words "take away” in verse 11 is translated from the Greek aphairein which means take away, remove, cut off.Leviticus 4
20 And he shall do with the bull as he did with the bull as a sin offering; thus he shall do with it. So the priest shall make atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven them.
26 And he shall burn all its fat on the altar, like the fat of the sacrifice of the peace offering. So the priest shall make [e]atonement for him concerning his sin, and it shall be forgiven him.
31 He shall remove all its fat, as fat is removed from the sacrifice of the peace offering; and the priest shall burn it on the altar for a sweet aroma to the Lord. So the priest shall make atonement for him, and it shall be forgiven him.
35 He shall remove all its fat, as the fat of the lamb is removed from the sacrifice of the peace offering. Then the priest shall burn it on the altar, according to the offerings made by fire to the Lord. So the priest shall make atonement for his sin that he has committed, and it shall be forgiven him.
Paul points out in Hebrews that the new Covenant didn't come because the law was imperfect but because of the people's refusal to obey it.
"For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. 8 Because finding fault with them, He says:"
A covenant is an agreement between two people - in this case the people of Israel and himself and it was they who broke the covenant. There was nothing wrong with the law or the covenant. It provided remission as God plainly told Moses and Aaron when he gave the law. The problem was with the people. He didn't find fault with the law, he found fault with them.
Not quite true. You cannot use a partial truth to prove your point as Scripture describes on several occasions the glory of God filling the temple. When God commanded the creation of the Tent of Meeting he took up residence in that tent and was mobile, just as the people were mobile. Later when Solomon built the Temple, God took up residence in the Temple by manifesting His glory there (1 Kings 8:1-11).Acts 7:48-49 ~ However, the Most High does not dwell in houses made by human hands. As the prophet says: Heaven is My throne and the earth is My footstool.
Isaiah 66:1
This is what the LORD says: "Heaven is My throne, and earth is My footstool. What kind of house will you build for Me? Or where will My place of repose be?
Acts 17:24
The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples made by human hands.
2 Corinthians 5:1
Now we know that if the earthly tent we live in is dismantled, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands.
Your citation of Num 19 evidences that you do not understand the difference between ceremonial uncleanness and sin resulting from moral failure.
Why do you cite Leviticus 4? Are you not aware of the difference between forgiveness and the taking away of sin?? Jesus alone takes away sin; no animal sacrifice is capable of taking away sin.
The only thing animal sacrifice does is cover for sin - it DOES NOT TAKE AWAY SIN.
Jn 1:29 states "The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! There is not a single verse in either the O.T. or N.T. that states that the blood of an animal takes away sin.
That is why the Lamb of God is a perfect and better sacrifice!
You have been arguing all along that Jesus fulfilled the animal sacrifices, which is true, yet you appear oblivious to the mechanism by which He did so.
The root of the Hebrew word translated “atonement” in the Old Testament is kaphar, which has the idea of “covering,” not total removal.
I agree. I expect this will get a lot of other posters caught off guard (and will most likely get misunderstood) but most of the references to "resurrection" in the Bible (that I can think of) are in reference to our spiritual rebirth. Our physical resurrection - as I understand it - was always understood by those in ancient Judaism (think of when the sister of Lazarus, Mary, made her comment about seeing her brother "on the last day"). The idea of a spiritual rebirth was foreign to them, however (like the exchange between Jesus and Nicodemus). Just as this passage demonstrates - most Bible references to "resurrection" are about our new eternal life and Christ Jesus' reversal of the (spiritual) death that came in the Garden.
I typically hold the resurrection of the just and unjust to have occurred around the time of the destruction of the Jerusalem. For in Daniel 12, we see that when the power of the holy people is shattered then would be completed the events of Daniel 12 which included the resurrection of the just and unjust.
this correlates nicely with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple occurring in the 1st century (this generation)and Paul’s statement that The resurrection of the just and unjust was “about to” occur (acts 24:15).
I view the 1st resurrection as being born again and the 2nd resurrection as going from natural body to spiritual body (1 Corinthians 15:44).
I typically don’t hold that the resurrection for believers is the Exact same as Christ’s. Christ’s flesh was prophesied to not see decay (acts 2:27). However believers were never given that same promise. I know plenty of believers whose flesh has decayed. Thus we go from natural body to spiritual body (1 Corinthians 15:44)
while dispensationalists typically hold to a rapture first, then resurrection of the dead (which is the exact opposite of scripture), I hold to the resurrection of the dead then After that, those who are in Christ are caught to be forever with the Lord, as stated in 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17. In other words, I hold that the resurrection of the just and unjust occurred around 66-70ad, and from that point on believers, who remain alive and physically die in the Lord are raised in a spiritual body and caught up to heaven. Thus this consummates the Ezekiel temple which is where Gods throne is and his footstool is (Ezekiel 43:6-7) where he forever dwells with his people
The word sin is there. The sin was covered over (temporarily) - not taken away (permanently) - two distinct outcomes - which is the fundamental difference between the old and new covenants.Except the word sin is used there. Yes, there were many ways one could be 'unclean,' but the water is mixed with the blood of the sacrifice and it says it purifies from sin. That's what it was for. Later we'll see the very same pattern in new testament baptism. The way we make contact with the blood sacrifice of Jesus today is by baptism. That's what Paul explains in Romans 6. The difference is that we don't burn an animal outside the camp and mix the ashes with the water. Jesus was sacrificed outside the camp just as the red heifer was.
Because the atonement is the provision for forgiveness. The animal sacrifices provided forgiveness only temporarily as they did not TAKE AWAY sin. That is why they had to be regularly done on an ongoing basis and did not stop. However, the atonement provided through Jesus' sacrificial blood did and does take away all types of sin - permanently.Ok.. Why do you think that has anything to do with Leviticus 4? It has nothing at all to do with Leviticus 4. The Hebrew word there is not kaphar, it is wan-is-lah - forgiven
The word sin is there. The sin was covered over (temporarily) - not taken away (permanently) - two distinct outcomes - which is the fundamental difference between the old and new covenants.
Our sins are NOT covered - they are removed!!! - Sermon Index
Because the atonement is the provision for forgiveness. The animal sacrifices provided forgiveness only temporarily as they did not TAKE AWAY sin. That is why they had to be regularly done on an ongoing basis and did not stop. However, the atonement provided through Jesus' sacrificial blood did and does take away all types of sin - permanently.
I don't know about your distinction. Jesus said that at the resurrection that no longer would men take women for marriage. So if that's talking about 70AD something seems amiss. Also, from what Paul says about the resurrection that when that happens it would seem we are getting new incorruptable physical bodies.
I'm aware of the difference. The animal sacrifices did provide for forgiveness - IMPERFECT & ONE TIME ONLY. Jesus' atoning sacrifice - PERFECT & FOR ALL TIME. Is that so hard to understand?
To own the "preterist" title associates us with error at best, and grievous heresy at worst, so we don't have to go there.
Except for when that "passionate desire" is based on prophecy and promises of a Messiah (like in Daniel and Isaiah). It's our desires that lead us to God in the first place.
Mainly the prophecy of Daniel (Daniel 9). Ancient Jews had been in anticipation of their Messiah (and even Herod recognized the time was "right" for Messiah to be born - which is why Herod commanded that all the baby boys under age of two to be killed (Matthew 2).Show exact Scripture please. Where are you talking about?
Scripture matters more to me than your links, writers and teachers. It is Scripture that forbids Preterism!!
In their theology, Premillennialism and Preterism welcome “the cares of this world (or age),” and every vice pertaining to it, into the “age to come,” thus negating the whole juxtapose between the two ages.
The core point of preterism is that Jesus had given time statements - specifically one example is: " Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened" (Matthew 24:34). Instead of trying to line this up with OUR expectations - we begin with the words of Jesus first.
Mainly the prophecy of Daniel (Daniel 9). Ancient Jews had been in anticipation of their Messiah (and even Herod recognized the time was "right" for Messiah to be born - which is why Herod commanded that all the baby boys under age of two to be killed (Matthew 2).
Daniel 8:17 ~ "Understand, O son of man, that the vision is for the time of the end.
Daniel 9:20-27 ~ While I was speaking, praying, confessing my sin and that of my people Israel, and presenting my petition before the LORD my God concerning His holy mountain— while I was still praying, Gabriel, the man I had seen in the earlier vision, came to me in swift flight about the time of the evening sacrifice. He instructed me and spoke with me, saying: “O Daniel, I have come now to give you insight and understanding. At the beginning of your petitions, an answer went out, and I have come to tell you, for you are highly precious. So consider the message and understand the vision: Seventy weekse are decreed for your people and your holy city to stop their transgression, to put an end to sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy Place.f Know and understand this: From the issuance of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, until the Messiah,g the Prince, there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of distress.Then after the sixty-two weeks,h the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing.
Then the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood, and until the end there will be war; desolations have been decreed. And he will confirm a covenant with many for one week,i but in the middle of the week he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of the temple will come the abomination that causes desolation,j until the decreed destruction is poured out upon him.”
Luke 1:11-19 ~
And an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing to the right of the altar of incense. Zacharias was troubled when he saw the angel, and fear gripped him. But the angel said to him, “Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your petition has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you will give him the name John. “You will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth. “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother’s womb. “And he will turn many of the sons of Israel back to the Lord their God. “It is he who will go as a forerunner before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, TO TURN THE HEARTS OF THE FATHERS BACK TO THE CHILDREN, and the disobedient to the attitude of the righteous, so as to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”
Zacharias said to the angel, “How will I know this for certain? For I am an old man and my wife is advanced in years.” The angel answered and said to him, “I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God, and I have been sent to speak to you and to bring you this good news.
Luke 1:26-38 ~
Gabriel Foretells Jesus’ Birth
In the sixth month, God sent the angel Gabriel to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin pledged in marriage to a man named Joseph, who was of the house of David. And the virgin’s name was Mary. The angel appeared to her and said, “Greetings,b you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.c ”. Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. So the angel told her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. Behold, you will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to give Him the name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David, and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever. His kingdom will never end!” “How can this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” The angel replied, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the Holy One to be born d will be called the Son of God. Look, even Elizabeth your relative has conceived a son in her old age, and she who was called barren is in her sixth month. For no word from God will ever fail.e ” “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May it happen to me according to your word.”
Well.....I disagree (obviously). I believe Scripture fully reveals the truth of preterism (or else I wouldn't have this belief).
I'm not too sure what you mean by "welcome the cares of this world (or age)".....but I, personally, recognize the imperfections that we live with. Lysa Terkeurst uses the phrase "between two gardens" to describe where we are right now (and I agree with that). All is NOT reconciled to Him. He's still in the process (as is humanity) of purification and making all things new (I believe).
No, of course not, but I'm not going to use up all the space of this forum in order to quote most of the Bible to you. I already regret spending the time quoting large chunks of the Bible when just saying "the Messianic prophecies" should have been sufficient.So Daniel texts are the only OT passages that you believe are pointing to Preterism?
The core point of preterism is that Jesus had given time statements - specifically one example is: " Truly I tell you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have happened" (Matthew 24:34). Instead of trying to line this up with OUR expectations - we begin with the words of Jesus first.
Mainly the prophecy of Daniel (Daniel 9). Ancient Jews had been in anticipation of their Messiah (and even Herod recognized the time was "right" for Messiah to be born - which is why Herod commanded that all the baby boys under age of two to be killed (Matthew 2).
Daniel 8:17 ~ "Understand, O son of man, that the vision is for the time of the end.
Daniel 9:20-27 ~ While I was speaking, praying, confessing my sin and that of my people Israel, and presenting my petition before the LORD my God concerning His holy mountain— while I was still praying, Gabriel, the man I had seen in the earlier vision, came to me in swift flight about the time of the evening sacrifice. He instructed me and spoke with me, saying: “O Daniel, I have come now to give you insight and understanding. At the beginning of your petitions, an answer went out, and I have come to tell you, for you are highly precious. So consider the message and understand the vision: Seventy weekse are decreed for your people and your holy city to stop their transgression, to put an end to sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy Place.f Know and understand this: From the issuance of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem, until the Messiah,g the Prince, there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks. It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of distress.Then after the sixty-two weeks,h the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing.
Then the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood, and until the end there will be war; desolations have been decreed. And he will confirm a covenant with many for one week,i but in the middle of the week he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of the temple will come the abomination that causes desolation,j until the decreed destruction is poured out upon him.”
Luke 1:11-19 ~
And an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing to the right of the altar of incense. Zacharias was troubled when he saw the angel, and fear gripped him. But the angel said to him, “Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your petition has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you will give him the name John. “You will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth. “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother’s womb. “And he will turn many of the sons of Israel back to the Lord their God. “It is he who will go as a forerunner before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, TO TURN THE HEARTS OF THE FATHERS BACK TO THE CHILDREN, and the disobedient to the attitude of the righteous, so as to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”
Zacharias said to the angel, “How will I know this for certain? For I am an old man and my wife is advanced in years.” The angel answered and said to him, “I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God, and I have been sent to speak to you and to bring you this good news.
Luke 1:26-38 ~
Gabriel Foretells Jesus’ Birth
In the sixth month, God sent the angel Gabriel to a town in Galilee called Nazareth, to a virgin pledged in marriage to a man named Joseph, who was of the house of David. And the virgin’s name was Mary. The angel appeared to her and said, “Greetings,b you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.c ”. Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. So the angel told her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. Behold, you will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to give Him the name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David, and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever. His kingdom will never end!” “How can this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” The angel replied, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the Holy One to be born d will be called the Son of God. Look, even Elizabeth your relative has conceived a son in her old age, and she who was called barren is in her sixth month. For no word from God will ever fail.e ” “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May it happen to me according to your word.”
Well.....I disagree (obviously). I believe Scripture fully reveals the truth of preterism (or else I wouldn't have this belief).
I'm not too sure what you mean by "welcome the cares of this world (or age)".....but I, personally, recognize the imperfections that we live with. Lysa Terkeurst uses the phrase "between two gardens" to describe where we are right now (and I agree with that). All is NOT reconciled to Him. He's still in the process (as is humanity) of purification and making all things new (I believe).
The "heaven and earth" written about here (and in a lot of NT passages) is referring to the covenant God made with Israel.We see that also in Hebrews 1:10-12 tells us, “Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands: They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old (palaioo) as doth a garment; And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed (allasso): but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail."
Edited: I responded in the next post.Perfection arrives with the age to come
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?