whats your theological worldview? QUIZ

[Michie]

You scored as a
Emergent/Postmodern
Emergent/Postmodern 82%
Classical Liberal 71%
Roman Catholic 68%
Modern Liberal 61%
Neo orthodox 46%
Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 39% Charismatic/Pentecostal 21%
Reformed Evangelical 18%
Fundamentalist 7

*sings*
Karin's 7% fundie in undies!

 

[Joykins]

What's your theological worldview? You scored as a Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan You are an evangelical in the Wesleyan tradition. You believe that God's grace enables you to choose to believe in him, even though you yourself are totally depraved. The gift of the Holy Spirit gives you assurance of your salvation, and he also enables you to live the life of obedience to which God has called us. You are influenced heavly by John Wesley and the Methodists.

Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 86%
Emergent/Postmodern 68%
Classical Liberal 68%
Neo orthodox 61%
Roman Catholic 54%
Modern Liberal 54%
Reformed Evangelical 36%
Charismatic/Pentecostal 29%
Fundamentalist 14%

---

This describes me, I think. I just started attending a Methodist church and love it so far, but I certainly also have pomo, liberal, and neo-orthodox leanings.

 

[MrJim]

What's your theological worldview?You scored as a Reformed EvangelicalYou are a Reformed Evangelical. You take the Bible very seriously because it is God's Word. You most likely hold to TULIP and are sceptical about the possibilities of universal atonement or resistible grace. The most important thing the Church can do is make sure people hear how they can go to heaven when they die.

Reformed Evangelical 79%
Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 71%
Neo orthodox 64%
Fundamentalist 61%
Emergent/Postmodern 43%
Classical Liberal 29%
Roman Catholic 29%
Modern Liberal 14%
Charismatic/Pentecostal 14%




First two kind of contradict themselves no? Not to mention there is no way I am more of a neo orthodox than a fundie.

maybe change your name to NeoGuy

 

[Valentine]

What's your theological worldview? You scored as a Emergent/Postmodern You are Emergent/Postmodern in your theology. You feel alienated from older forms of church, you don't think they connect to modern culture very well. No one knows the whole truth about God, and we have much to learn from each other, and so learning takes place in dialogue. Evangelism should take place in relationships rather than through crusades and altar-calls. People are interested in spirituality and want to ask questions, so the church should help them to do this.
Emergent/Postmodern 82%
Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 71%
Classical Liberal 57%
Modern Liberal 54%
Roman Catholic 50%
Reformed Evangelical 46%
Neo orthodox 46%
Charismatic/Pentecostal 46%
Fundamentalist 21%

Am I moderate enough to be in this group? Please. I need a home. ;(

 

[Izdaari Eristikon]

Am I moderate enough to be in this group? Please. I need a home. ;(

Yeppers! Welcome home!

"Moderate" is a misnomer for this place anyway. We voted to change it to Bridge Builders, a much more accurate name, but for some reason the change is tied up in red tape. This place is more about being reasonable, tolerant and inclusive than it is about holding a specific theological view. So why doesn't that make us liberals? It just doesn't, though there are some liberals here. Many of us (me for one) are conservatives on doctrine but with a different attitude. And many of us don't like the whole liberal vs. conservative dichotomy and are trying to transcend it.

 

[Valentine]

Yeppers! Welcome home!
. . . And many of us don't like the whole liberal vs. conservative dichotomy and are trying to transcend it.

^^ That is my attitude exactly. Thanks for the welcome.

 

[habeas]

...

 

[ReformedChapin]

maybe change your name to NeoGuy

I think this is a better representation of my beliefs

You are a Reformed Evangelical. You take the Bible very seriously because it is God's Word. You most likely hold to TULIP and are sceptical about the possibilities of universal atonement or resistible grace. The most important thing the Church can do is make sure people hear how they can go to heaven when they die. Reformed Evangelical

Reformed Evangelical 86%
Fundamentalist 68%
Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 68%
Neo orthodox 64%
Emergent/Postmodern 50%
Classical Liberal 29%
Roman Catholic 21%
Modern Liberal 11%
Charismatic/Pentecostal 4%


I like the title "reformation guy"

 

[DailyBlessings]

The funny thing is, most people at my (very liberal) seminary take me to be kind of conservative, but the internet always thinks I'm a raving liberal, presumably because of my stance on the various "culture wars". That said, Evangelical Holiness is new. I don't think anyone has ever accused me of Wesleyanism before, though I realize looking back which questions led to that score.

Emergent/Postmodern 82%
Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 71%
Neo orthodox 64%
Modern Liberal 54%
Classical Liberal 50%
Reformed Evangelical 46%
Roman Catholic 46%
Charismatic/Pentecostal 39%
Fundamentalist 21%

 

[HumbleMan]

What's your theological worldview?You scored as a Evangelical Holiness/WesleyanYou are an evangelical in the Wesleyan tradition. You believe that God's grace enables you to choose to believe in him, even though you yourself are totally depraved. The gift of the Holy Spirit gives you assurance of your salvation, and he also enables you to live the life of obedience to which God has called us. You are influenced heavly by John Wesley and the Methodists.Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 89% Fundamentalist 64% Emergent/Postmodern 57% Neo orthodox 50% Reformed Evangelical 46% Classical Liberal 46% Charismatic/Pentecostal 43% Modern Liberal 36% Roman Catholic 29%
This is kinda funny. I've only attended maybe one or two Methodist services in my entire life.

 

[Nathan45]

Here's what happens when a deist takes this test

You scored as a Classical Liberal
You are a classical liberal. You are sceptical about much of the historicity of the Bible, and the most important thing Jesus has done is to set us a good moral example that we are to follow. Doctrines like the trinity and the incarnation are speculative and not really important, and in the face of science and philosophy the surest way we can be certain about God is by our inner awareness of him. Discipleship is expressed by good moral behaviour, but inward religious feeling is most important.

Classical Liberal 86%

Modern Liberal 86%

Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan 75%

Emergent/Postmodern 71%

Neo orthodox 57%

Roman Catholic 36%

Fundamentalist 0%

Reformed Evangelical 0%

Charismatic/Pentecostal 0%

 

[Nathan45]

Another quiz by the same guy:

http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=7092N

Which theologian are you?
You scored as a Charles Finney
You're passionate about God and love to preach the Gospel. Your theology borders on pelagianism and it is said that if God were taken out of your theology, it would look exactly the same.

Charles Finney 67%

Paul Tillich 67%

John Calvin 67%

Augustine 33%

Friedrich Schleiermacher 33%

Anselm 33%

Jürgen Moltmann 13%

Martin Luther 0%

Jonathan Edwards 0%

Karl Barth 0%

http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=7092N

 

[Nathan45]

Why do I get the idea a Wesleyan made the quiz?

seems to be in everyone's top 3, no matter who you are.

 

[MrSnow]

Which theologian are you?
You scored as a Karl Barth
The daddy of 20th Century theology. You perceive liberal theology to be a disaster and so you insist that the revelation of Christ, not human experience, should be the starting point for all theology.
Karl Barth
93%
John Calvin
87%
Friedrich Schleiermacher
53%
Anselm
47%
Paul Tillich
33%
Jürgen Moltmann
20%
Jonathan Edwards
20%
Charles Finney
13%
Martin Luther
13%
Augustine
7%

 

[Izdaari Eristikon]

Which theologian are you?

You scored as a Anselm

Anselm is the outstanding theologian of the medieval period.He sees man's primary problem as having failed to render unto God what we owe him, so God becomes man in Christ and gives God what he is due. You should read 'Cur Deus Homo?'

80% Anselm
73% John Calvin
67% Karl Barth
60% Friedrich Schleiermacher
60% Martin Luther
53% Augustine
47% Paul Tillich
40% Charles Finney
33% Jonathan Edwards
27% Jürgen Moltmann

 

[Molal]

Here I am:

What's your theological worldview? You scored as a Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan You are an evangelical in the Wesleyan tradition. You believe that God's grace enables you to choose to believe in him, even though you yourself are totally depraved. The gift of the Holy Spirit gives you assurance of your salvation, and he also enables you to live the life of obedience to which God has called us. You are influenced heavly by John Wesley and the Methodists. Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan
86% Emergent/Postmodern
75% Modern Liberal
68% Classical Liberal
61% Neo orthodox
57% Reformed Evangelical
50% Roman Catholic
39% Fundamentalist
18% Charismatic/Pentecostal
4%

 

[Valentine]

You scored as a Anselm Anselm is the outstanding theologian of the medieval period.He sees man's primary problem as having failed to render unto God what we owe him, so God becomes man in Christ and gives God what he is due. You should read 'Cur Deus Homo?'
Anselm 100%
Karl Barth 87%
Friedrich Schleiermacher 80%
Jonathan Edwards 73%
John Calvin 73%
Charles Finney 67%
Jürgen Moltmann 60%
Martin Luther 47%
Augustine 40%
Paul Tillich 33%

Izdaari, looks like we may be almost on the same page theologically.

 

[Izdaari Eristikon]

Izdaari, looks like we may be almost on the same page theologically.

Yep, pretty close!

 

[Valentine]

I've considered Anselm and wondered about him, so I looked him up:

Saint Anselm of Canterbury (1033 – April 21, 1109) was an Italian medieval philosopher, theologian, and church official who held the office of Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to 1109. Called the founder of scholasticism, he is famous as the originator of the ontological argument for the existence of God and as the archbishop who openly opposed the Crusades.

Anselm's Argument may be summarized thus:

1. God is, by definition, a being greater than anything that can be imagined.
2. Existence in reality, and imagination is greater than existence solely in one's imagination.
3. Therefore, God must exist in reality; if God did not, then God would not be a being greater than anything that can be imagined.

This is a shorter modern version of the argument. Anselm framed the argument as a reductio ad absurdum wherein he tried to show that the assumption that God does not exist leads to a logical contradiction. The following steps more closely follow Anselm's line of reasoning:

1. God is that entity than which nothing can be greater.
2. The concept of God exists in human understanding.
3. God exists in one's mind but not in reality.
4. The concept of God's existence is understood in one's mind.
5. If God existed in reality it would be a greater thing than God's existence in the mind.
6. The final step to God's existence is that God in reality must exists.