Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
Are the skulls objective evidence...yes or no?I gave you the objective evidence for those skulls.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are the skulls objective evidence...yes or no?I gave you the objective evidence for those skulls.
What is this "goal"?
I would like to stick to the skulls I posted rather than ducks if you don't mind. thanks.
You can complain when you see Him.Kind of strange, that a God would bother designing man (as some claim) and have to wait billions of years for this to come to be.
Then, have modern man be on earth for about 200,000 years, before he sends his son to save everyone and make it mandatory that people believe in this son, yet only expose him to a small portion of the population.
Kind of goofy.
No I do not agree. The burden rests on those that make the claim that the evidence of design in life forms is an illusion produced by evolutionary processes.
lol what? You can't even answer a simple question...You can't even admit to the units on a y-axis for those skulls. Until you can accept some basic concepts, like graphs, there really isn't anything further to talk about.
You can complain when you see Him.![]()
You have there two different sets of goalposts.No I do not agree. The burden rests on those that make the claim that the evidence of design in life forms is an illusion produced by evolutionary processes.
lol what? You can't even answer a simple question...
Its not a hypothesis.Normally, you don't require people to die in order to test a hypothesis.
See no answer once again. Evasion once again.What units are on the y axis in this graph?
http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/images/fossil_hominin_cranial_capacity_lg.png
See no answer once again. Evasion once again.
Design in all of nature is the evidence. If one claims that the evidence of design is based on a faulty interpretation...i.e design then they must show with evidence how that is faulty.You have there two different sets of goalposts.
Why shouldn't those claiming ID, like yourself, shoulder the burden of evidence? Because you can't?
Design in all of nature is the evidence.
If one claims that the evidence of design is based on a faulty interpretation...i.e design then they must show with evidence how that is faulty.
This is laughable. On what other claims can we pull out "you'll find out when you die" canard? You'll know the truth behind UFOs after you die. The secrets behind 9/11 will be revealed after your final breath. Bigfoot will meet you in the afterlife.You can complain when you see Him.![]()
You are making assumptions here. I asked if the skulls in the picture were objective evidence and you wanted to deflect the question with your graph. Now I would like to have an actual answer of yes or no for my question please.How can I discuss evidence with someone who can't even read a graph?
You are making assumptions here. I asked if the skulls in the picture were objective evidence and you wanted to deflect the question with your graph.