That is a flat out lie. I have asked you, at least twice, to show how evolution is wrong, using the fossil record as an example. And the only thing you have done is say "creation explains it" and left it at that.
The classification of the fossil record is in error.
All you have ever observed is Asian mates with Asian and produces only Asian. African mates with African and produces only African. Only when Asian mates with African do you observe variation (Afro-Asian) in the record.
All you have ever observed is Husky mates with Husky and produces only Husky. Mastiff mates with Mastiff and produces only Mastiff. Only when Husky mates with Mastiff do you observe variation (Chinook) in the record.
The Asian remained Asian, the African remained African, the Husky remained Husky, the Mastiff remained Mastiff. None of them evolved into anything and no links were missing. Just as the T-Rex remained T-Rex, the Triceratops remained Triceratops, etc, etc......
If you had never observed a dog in life but only had fossils of them, you would insist the Husky or Mastiff evolved into the Chinook simply because the Chinook appeared at a later time in the record. And would be wrong.
These:
Are no different than these:
Just different infra-specific taxa in the species to which each belongs.
They can't even get babies and adults classified correctly.
When you classify the fossil record according to what we observe in real life - instead of ignoring it - let me know.