• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What would it take to make you a Christian?

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
If he tells me he can't give me perfect peace & bliss, then shall I not conclude that he cannot be the highest? and continue to seek something higher than him? I would then probably believe that he's likely a deluded demiurge-type deity.
I suspect peace would come from BELIEVING (possibly mistakenly believing) that everything is as it should be. If your newborn dies unexpectedly, you can have peace if you truly believe that this apparent tragedy was somehow necessary in God's plan.

Why should perfect peace & bliss be the goal? Maybe there is something we need to do besides experiencing peace & bliss?
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,146
3,176
Oregon
✟929,073.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
The rules are there to help us to learn what LOVE is. Everything stems from the two greatest commandments of LOVE:

(New Testament | Matthew 22:36 - 40)

36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

The law of sacrifice was fulfilled by the atonement. Our goal should be to LOVE the way Christ LOVED.
I'm reminded of what the medieval mystic Marguerite Porete wrote when she distinguished between two kinds of churches. The first is the Great Holy Church, which preaches Love. The second is the Little Holy Church, which preaches rules and law and order.

It needs to be noted that the latter Church, the one that preaches rules and law and order, burned her at the stake.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
Some people I suspect are open if they found some reasons to believe (evidence), and other people have reasons to disbelieve that would trump any evidence.

We could consider the question by asking what would it take for a Christain to become a Jew?

One knows, that as a Christain, the Old Testament has found fulfillment in Christ, thus a Christain is in reality a Jew that has found the fulfillment.

How could one then revert back to be only a Jew?

Now we move on in History and we have another Message from Muhammad given in Quran, that also is a fulfillment. The Muslim Faith thus embraces Jew and Christain. Then we move on further and we Have the Revelation of Baha'u'llah that embraces Quran and Bible.

So my answer is the only way forward, is not backwards. There is no way that all Muslims will go back to only Jesus and likewise a Baha'i will not reject any Messenger when we already see they are all Christ.

Regards Tony
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

Sanoy

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2017
3,169
1,421
America
✟133,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I it seems obvious to me that Judaism evolved from Canaanite religion gradually and Christianity evolved from Judaism. Jesus hanging on the cross as a some sort of sacrifice for the sins of the world is just not something I think I can take seriously ever again.
Regarding Canaanite beliefs and Israelite beliefs, I think you are using a text critical method which employs the idea of an evolution in the passing on of information from a single source to a multitude of sources. The problem with this method is that it is employed under the presumption that the information is false or local to begin with. Under the belief that it is false or local it must have an originating account, which then must be passed down. However if the belief is true and broad, then the account itself is the explanation for why it is multiply reported. Everyone in the entire ancient near east had the same core beliefs but they structured those beliefs differently. Both the Israelites and the Canaanites structured the adversary as leviathan/Lotan but the Babylonians had the same creature under Mushussu. Same with the angels, Watchers, Apkallu, Igigi. They all shared the same core system, but expressed them with minor variations. Imagine a mountain which is encompassed by 4 countries. If the mountain explodes, or some other event happens at it's peak we will find 4 different accounts of that event without requiring a progressively transmitted narrative.


Meaning, is the material of an immaterial world like that of the spiritual realm. Through physics and chemistry we can fully describe the properties of blood, and if I present my closed fist to you with the thumb up we can fully describe the properties of my hand. But physics and chemistry cannot describe the meaning of my raised thumb. That is a property of meaning expressed through the material and apprehended by a consciousness. So it does no good to ponder spiritual things by considering physical properties like that of blood. Jesus's death was a ransom paid to the adversary because the adversary owns all those with guilt. Jesus took our guilt to where it belongs, freeing us from bondage, and by his nature He survived the punishment for our guilt.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

He is the way

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2018
8,103
359
Murray
✟120,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
I'm reminded of what the medieval mystic Marguerite Porete wrote when she distinguished between two kinds of churches. The first is the Great Holy Church, which preaches Love. The second is the Little Holy Church, which preaches rules and law and order.

It needs to be noted that the latter Church, the one that preaches rules and law and order, burned her at the stake.
Sadly many have died that did not deserve to die, and many have been misjudged and tormented by others who did not deserve to be treated thus. God is LOVE.
 
Upvote 0

Eyes wide Open

Love and peace is the ONLY foundation-to build....
Dec 13, 2011
977
136
Australia
✟42,410.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Some people I suspect are open if they found some reasons to believe (evidence), and other people have reasons to disbelieve that would trump any evidence.

My faith in what I deem to be a higher wisdom and authority doesn't rely on being Christian, so for me its irrelevant.
 
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Regarding Canaanite beliefs and Israelite beliefs, I think you are using a text critical method which employs the idea of an evolution in the passing on of information from a single source to a multitude of sources.
Not exactly. According to Jewish and Christian claims, their religions result from great revelations at key moments in time. I would expect to see historical evidence for great changes in their religions at key moments followed by periods of stability. Instead, I see something more like one of those online collective stories where one person writes a paragraph and then another person writes a paragraph so that the story has no direction. If God is inspiring a religion then I expect to see a consistent direction and theme and a rate of progress that contrasts that religion with the bumbling uninspired competing religions. Instead Judaism and Christianity seem to bumble along like all the other religions.

And that is only one of many issues I have with Christianity. After a person takes off the blinders of childhood indoctrination and sees with a less biased perspective, it is difficult to take any of it seriously. There is a period of time when a skeptic hasn't entirely given up hope that the childhood Christian faith can be restored through a new and more mature perspective. Those are probably the people who write the testimonials about being atheist and returning to Christianity. But eventually a skeptic sadly accepts what is seen without the blinders and it is hard to imagine any evidence that could change what is seen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sanoy
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
We could consider the question by asking what would it take for a Christain to become a Jew?

One knows, that as a Christain, the Old Testament has found fulfillment in Christ, thus a Christain is in reality a Jew that has found the fulfillment.

How could one then revert back to be only a Jew?

Now we move on in History and we have another Message from Muhammad given in Quran, that also is a fulfillment. The Muslim Faith thus embraces Jew and Christain. Then we move on further and we Have the Revelation of Baha'u'llah that embraces Quran and Bible.

So my answer is the only way forward, is not backwards. There is no way that all Muslims will go back to only Christ and likewise a Baha'i will not reject any Messenger when we already see they are all Christ.

Regards Tony

What if (hypothetically) you saw evidence that Baha'u'llah wrote letters to friends chuckling about the gullibility of his followers (somewhat like we have for L. Ron Hubbard)? That would probably kill your faith in Baha'i if you believed the letters were authentic? Where would that land you? Would you be an atheist or would you try backtracking to Christianity or would you try something else entirely? Maybe that hypothetical seems too far-out or sacrilegious to contemplate (I have a zany imagination LOL).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
What if (hypothetically) you saw evidence that Baha'u'llah wrote letters to friends chuckling about the gullibility of his followers (somewhat like we have for L. Ron Hubbard)? That would probably kill your faith in Baha'i if you believed the letters were authentic? Where would that land you? Would you be an atheist or would you try backtracking to Christianity or would you try something else entirely?

Faith built on foundations of rock stands firm. I know there will be no such letters.

The Issue with past faiths, we can now all read what was written and what man decided it means. What Muhamad, Bab and Baha'u'llah have done is shown how it should have been interpreted.

One will not find any evidence against them, that is based in any truth.

Regards Tony
 
  • Like
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,894
4,708
✟355,973.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
We could consider the question by asking what would it take for a Christain to become a Jew?

One knows, that as a Christain, the Old Testament has found fulfillment in Christ, thus a Christain is in reality a Jew that has found the fulfillment.

How could one then revert back to be only a Jew?

Now we move on in History and we have another Message from Muhammad given in Quran, that also is a fulfillment. The Muslim Faith thus embraces Jew and Christain. Then we move on further and we Have the Revelation of Baha'u'llah that embraces Quran and Bible.

So my answer is the only way forward, is not backwards. There is no way that all Muslims will go back to only Jesus and likewise a Baha'i will not reject any Messenger when we already see they are all Christ.

Regards Tony

This answer presumes the religions all build on one another. They don't. What would it take for you as a Bahai to become a Christian? I imagine you would have to be convinced that all the religions you say agree with each other actually contradict each other, right?
 
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
This answer presumes the religions all build on one another. They don't. What would it take for you as a Bahai to become a Christian? I imagine you would have to be convinced that all the religions you say agree with each other actually contradict each other, right?
My understanding is that Baha'i believes in the Manifestations and the initial forms of their Revelations that formed the preceding religions, but Baha'i believes these Revelations have been garbled. So the contradictions between these religions are a result of the garbling rather than fundamental differences in the Revelations. Of course @Tony Bristow-Stagg can correct me if I am misunderstanding their view.
 
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
This answer presumes the religions all build on one another. They don't. What would it take for you as a Bahai to become a Christian? I imagine you would have to be convinced that all the religions you say agree with each other actually contradict each other, right?

A Christian according to Jesus, is one who builds their belief upon the knowledge that Jesus is the Christ, the Son and this is what Jesus confirmed from Peter.

I am a follower of Christ, this same Holy Spirit is in all Gods Messengers. The first and the last. The alpha and omega, the beginning and the end.

I see Baha'u'llah (Glory of God) is the promised Father, Christ the Son returned as Christ the Father.

Regards Tony
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,894
4,708
✟355,973.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
A Christian according to Jesus, is one who builds their belief upon the knowledge that Jesus is the Christ, the Son and this is what Jesus confirmed from Peter.

I am a follower of Christ, this same Holy Spirit is in all Gods Messengers. The first and the last. The alpha and omega, the beginning and the end.

I see Baha'u'llah (Glory of God) is the promised Father, Christ the Son returned as Christ the Father.

Regards Tony

Doesn't answer my question. Rather your just asserting your beliefs as if that answers the OP on what would it take to make you a Christian. Essentially you've redefined the word Christian to mean what you as a bahai want it to mean, making it completely devoid of it's historical context.

It would be much like me saying I am the truer Bahai because I follow the splendor of Christ who is God almighty. Doesn't do us any good in actually answering this question.

So, are you able to question of what it would take to make you a Christian? (not your definition of a Christian but the actual historic definition). You can say nothing though that seems unhelpful.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,894
4,708
✟355,973.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
My understanding is that Baha'i believes in the Manifestations and the initial forms of their Revelations that formed the preceding religions, but Baha'i believes these Revelations have been garbled. So the contradictions between these religions are a result of the garbling rather than fundamental differences in the Revelations. Of course @Tony Bristow-Stagg can correct me if I am misunderstanding their view.
Bahai will never say it as clearly or openly as you say it. Though I agree, this is what they believe. Hence I doubt the Bahai will actually say what it would take to make them a Christian and answer your question. Though I suppose if it could be substantially demonstrate that the Church and later Christians have not distorted the Gospel they would have to concede that as legitimate grounds for considering Christianity true.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
Doesn't answer my question. Rather your just asserting your beliefs as if that answers the OP on what would it take to make you a Christian. Essentially you've redefined the word Christian to mean what you as a bahai want it to mean, making it completely devoid of it's historical context.

It would be much like me saying I am the truer Bahai because I follow the splendor of Christ who is God almighty. Doesn't do us any good in actually answering this question.

So, are you able to question of what it would take to make you a Christian? (not your definition of a Christian but the actual historic definition). You can say nothing though that seems unhelpful.

I would say that what made me a Christian was the Message of Baha'u'llah.

Of course, you do not have to see it can be so, or agree with it.

Regards Tony
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,894
4,708
✟355,973.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I would say that what made me a Christian was the Message of Baha'u'llah.

Of course, you do not have to see it can be so, or agree with it.

Regards Tony

As I said before, redefining a word doesn't make you that thing. I'm an atheist because I deny your God, but I'm also a Bahai because I believe in the splendor of Christ and let's not forget how much of a Jew I am despite the fact I am neither circumcised nor Jewish by birth.

I guess when you belong to a religion like Bahai, where obfuscation and confusion are mandatory, you can say whatever you want. You are a Christian, despite not being part of any Church, despite dismissing all Christian history and theology, despite denying the core principles of the Christian religion. Yes Tony, you are a Christian, if and only if the term Christian means nothing and can be applied to any who claim to follow Jesus. Muslims, Mormons, Jehovah's witnesses, certain Jews, certain Atheists. They are all Christians.

Do you have a serious response to the question asked? Or will just be like, lol, we're all one guys. It's not about me not agreeing, it's about whether or not Bahai can actually answer a question or argue for the proposition all religions are true so that the question cannot be answered in a way.

In which case you have to demonstrate how modern Christianity is false, yet as a Bahai you cannot do that for you are afraid to criticize other religions directly.
 
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
My understanding is that Baha'i believes in the Manifestations and the initial forms of their Revelations that formed the preceding religions, but Baha'i believes these Revelations have been garbled. So the contradictions between these religions are a result of the garbling rather than fundamental differences in the Revelations. Of course @Tony Bristow-Stagg can correct me if I am misunderstanding their view.

Bahai will never say it as clearly or openly as you say it. Though I agree, this is what they believe. Hence I doubt the Bahai will actually say what it would take to make them a Christian and answer your question. Though I suppose if it could be substantially demonstrate that the Church and later Christians have not distorted the Gospel they would have to concede that as legitimate grounds for considering Christianity true.

I see that I say what I beleive to be so and of course, others do not have to see it that way.

One of the Biblical warnings is not to add to the Word in the Bible. When the church created doctrine and made it fundamental to being a Christain, it is clear that is adding to the Word in the Bible.

It is also clear the Bible is not for private interpretation.

Thus as I have said, it took the Message of Baha'u'llah before I could understand what it was to be a Christian, a Lover and dedicated follower of Christ.

It is also apparent when I say that, that my frame of reference is not based on Christain doctrines. That is as honest as it can get, without offering many more details as to why and how that can be so.

Regards Tony
 
  • Like
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
As I said before, redefining a word doesn't make you that thing. I'm an atheist because I deny your God, but I'm also a Bahai because I believe in the splendor of Christ and let's not forget how much of a Jew I am despite the fact I am neither circumcised nor Jewish by birth.

I guess when you belong to a religion like Bahai, where obfuscation and confusion are mandatory, you can say whatever you want. You are a Christian, despite not being part of any Church, despite dismissing all Christian history and theology, despite denying the core principles of the Christian religion. Yes Tony, you are a Christian, if and only if the term Christian means nothing and can be applied to any who claim to follow Jesus. Muslims, Mormons, Jehovah's witnesses, certain Jews, certain Atheists. They are all Christians.

Do you have a serious response to the question asked? Or will just be like, lol, we're all one guys. It's not about me not agreeing, it's about whether or not Bahai can actually answer a question or argue for the proposition all religions are true so that the question cannot be answered in a way.

In which case you have to demonstrate how modern Christianity is false, yet as a Bahai you cannot do that for you are afraid to criticize other religions directly.

It is most likley the early Christains heard much the same responses when they tried to explain how Jesus the Christ was who the Jews were awaiting.

Thus it is best we leave it there, as Faith is about producing fruits of the spirit.

Regards Tony
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,894
4,708
✟355,973.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I see that I say what I beleive to he so and of course others do not have to see it that way.

One of the Biblical warnings is not to add to the Word in the Bible. When the church created doctrine and made it fundamental to being a Christain, it is clear that is adding to the Word in the Bible.

It is also clear the Bible is not for private interpretation.

Thus as I have said, it took the Message of Baha'u'llah before I could understand what it was to be a Christian, a Lover and dedicated follower of Christ.

It is also apparent when I say that, that my frame of reference is not based on Christain doctrines. That is as honest as it can get, without offering many more details as to why and how that can be so.

Regards Tony


We haven't added words to the Bible, they are same (more or less) yesterday and today. If you object to doctrine or interpreting the text and trying to apply it then you simply have an unrealistic expectation of the Church to not clarify it's teachings when issues of controversy appear. It would be both irresponsible and lazy for the Church to do nothing in the face of criticism within and without, so what would you have suggested the Church do during the Donatist controversy? Not rule on the matter of the lapsed or those who sacrificed to Caesar? Should the Church have remained silent on Arianism when the very identity of God was called into question? Absolutely not.

Also, insisting you are a Christian, despite your redefinition of the word is not a response to the charge you make the word meaningless. Your attempt to answer the question, what would it take for you to make you a Christian, is not to lay out conditions which Christianity could either demonstrate or affirm something that would convince you, it is instead to say you are Christian. Thus you avoid in the question from the outset. You were not asked, what would it take to make you a Christian, however you define it.

It's somewhat clever but at the same time it's obvious to see through. So the question (so you cannot avoid answering it), can be rephrased, what would it take to make you a historic Christian of some kind? Historic in this context refers to those traditions, Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant and Oriental.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,894
4,708
✟355,973.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
It is most likley the early Christains heard much the same responses when they tried to explain how Jesus the Christ was who the Jews were awaiting.

Thus it is best we leave it there, as Faith is about producing fruits of the spirit.

Regards Tony
Avoiding answering the question yet again.
 
Upvote 0

Tony Bristow-Stagg

Active Member
Sep 29, 2018
233
119
Normanton Far North West Queensland
✟29,250.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baha'i
Marital Status
Married
It's somewhat clever but at the same time it's obvious to see through. So the question (so you cannot avoid answering it), can be rephrased, what would it take to make you a historic Christian of some kind? Historic in this context refers to those traditions, Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant and Oriental.

Thus it is best we leave it there, as Faith is about producing fruits of the spirit.

I wish you always well and happy in Jesus the Christ.

Regards Tony
 
Upvote 0