Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, and I wouldn't care if another source did exist.
I couldn't care less if extra-Biblical sources either confirm or deny Biblical stories.
The Bible says it, that settles it.
Put another way, I don't need a second opinion when it comes to the Bible.
No, and I wouldn't care if another source did exist.
I couldn't care less if extra-Biblical sources either confirm or deny Biblical stories.
The Bible says it, that settles it.
Put another way, I don't need a second opinion when it comes to the Bible.
Okay, Strathos, I'm getting the feeling you're being obtuse on purpose.You think the millennium has started already? Also this completely ignored my point.
Have you ever done otherwise?Then you'll understand if I take your approach of reality with a grain of salt.
53But there are so many different translations of the Bible, and so many books and passages that were added, edited, removed... there wasn't even a coherent canon until 325 AD.
Have you ever read any of the Biblical Apocrypha? It was early church leaders who decided to leave it out but in my opinion it is potentially as valid as any other Scripture. Of course it's also been translated and altered a lot... but it's very interesting.
I see by your user title who your saviour is; which jives with my th... er ... hypothesis that the Tribulation period will consist of Christianity vs. Scientism.There was a time when I was a "bible thumper" too, but the scales fell from my eyes, and the truth set me free.
I see by your user title who your saviour is; which jives with my th... er ... hypothesis that the Tribulation period will consist of Christianity vs. Scientism.
As my pastor once said, there are two ways a person can be 'born again:' by corruptible seed or by incorruptible.
1 Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
Nephilim families.What Would Falsify the Flood?
Sure ... just build a time machine and go back to BC 4004 and have at it.
I can imagine Theistic Evolutionists getting a ride back in time ... compliments of the One reigning on the throne during the Millennial Reign ... and actually seeing God speak the universe into existence; and hanging their heads in shame at all the time they wasted because they thought it went down differently.
Okay, Strathos, I'm getting the feeling you're being obtuse on purpose.
Let's recap this conversation.
1. I was asked how Jesus will disprove evolution, when Satan shows it to be a perfectly viable piece of history; and I answered by saying that Jesus could possibly take us back in history to Genesis 1 and show us, Himself.
2. You (or someone) asked me that, if it was different than what I expected, would I blame it on Satan?
3. No ... I would not blame it on Satan, as Satan will be bound in the Bottomless Pit, and blaming him would be foolish.
What is this? my résumé?I can imagine Creationists getting a ride back in time.. compliments of the disembodied head of Charles Darwin... and actually seeing macro-evolution occurring over the millenia; and them hanging their heads in shame at all the time they wasted on their Holy War on science because they thought it went down differentially. So what.. its all just imagining.. like the ark built in New Jersey, and flood water wooshed over to Neptune and Adam speaking english and writing GEN 1 and 2, or the Anti-Christ proving abiogenesis and leading evil scientists on a bloody pogram against bible Christians.
We already went over this with how the Bible is mostly a collection of stories that grew with the telling.Nephilim families.
Can we please stop letting AV make this thread about himself and get back to the topic - What Would Falsify the Flood?
You mean you did. I don't agree with that. I believe the term you're referring to is called retrospective falsification; and I don't subscribe to it, as far as the Bible is concerned.We already went over this with how the Bible is mostly a collection of stories that grew with the telling.
Yes.You claimed that Goliath had Nephilim blood in him. Do you stand by that statement?
If that's what you believe, I won't dispute it. Perhaps Goliath was still just a "small boy" at the time.I say that Goliath was not a giant by any means and was just a tall warrior.
Just this one ...Pretty much... did I miss anything?
Don't need a link.
The Ark was made of what the Bible calls 'gopher wood' -- which, of course, is nothing more than copper, mixed with trace elements, called "pitch" -- (probably carbon for hardness).
Keep in mind that Noah's predecessors were top-notch metallurgists.
Thus the Ark was a giant state-of-the Ark submarine, complete with periscope.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?