Atheos canadensis
Well-Known Member
That's what happens when you play "make believe".
It is tricky to keep things straight when you're moving the goal posts that quickly. Next thing we know he'll be saying that we shouldn't expect to detect the pattern at all, but it's totally there. I assume he's tried and failed to find (or at least realized he won't find) any support for his position and is backpedaling wildly so that he can convince himself that he is right but that he doesn't need to prove the pattern exists. He is in a bit of a pickle here. He can't admit that the pattern doesn't exist because that will prove the Flood never happened. But he can't find any proof beyond mere assertion that the pattern exists. And he has too much pride to allow us to think we've bested him so he's forced to go around in circles, first ignoring and then trying to change the subject. Does it make me a bad person if I enjoy watching him squirm?
Upvote
0