Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It was a miracle, a no ifs hows or buts plain up and down God produced miracle.The issue still remains that the meandering shape of the entire GC (not merely the Colorado river at the bottom) is utterly inconsistent with the Flood model. We know from actual observations that catastrophic flows produce straight, wide, flat-bottomed channels. For the Flood model to account for the GC, you have to explain how a high-energy, high-volume flow could produce a meandering canyon. Spoiler: you can't do this unless you can prove that the laws of physics were different in the past.
It is the exact pattern we see.
Lowest to highest geological eras:
Cambrian - molluscs and anthropods (trilobites, etc)
Ordovician - molluscs and anthropods and start of jawed fishes.
Silurian - jawed and bony fish
Devonian - ray finned and lobe finned bony
Carboniferous - amphibians and anthropods
Permian - aminiotes, turtles, small mammals, reptiles, etc.
Triasic - beginning of small dinosaurs
Jurassic - dinosaurs proper
Cretaseous - more dinosaurs including types not seen in Jurassic because of density and size differences.
And so forth up to the modern period.
All merely caused by settlement and layering as the sediments themselves settled out of the water.
Of course with wind and wave fluctuations and differences in height of landmasses, we would expect a tiny divergence here and there as nothing is perfect. As the water receeded off of high land masses, some mixing would occur and smaller animals washed upwards and larger downwards. It only occurs perfectly in the laboratory. And this is exactly what we see.
Well, yes, I suppose that, cladistically, dinosaurs would be reptiles. But then again, so would people.
I would expect nothing from a transitional species as evolutionists define them since they do not exist .
It was a miracle, a no ifs hows or buts plain up and down God produced miracle.
'Miracle', a lovely word, it's a band aid a bandage and a cure all pill for everything unexplainable, a creationists friend.
Used by conmen throughout the ages to answer unanswerable questions.
I'm assuming that's what the answer will have to be because I'm pretty certain no one on this forum is up to the task of demonstrating that the laws of physics operated differently in the past. I have asked this question twice on this thread and in other places as well and have always been met with resounding silence. Not even an attempt at addressing it because even hardcore Flood proponents understand that there is no evidence-based counter argument to be made. The only option, as you point out, is to invoke a miracle.
I would say "miracle" is one of you guys' most-feared words in the English language.It was a miracle, a no ifs hows or buts plain up and down God produced miracle.
'Miracle', a lovely word, it's a band aid a bandage and a cure all pill for everything unexplainable, a creationists friend.
Used by conmen throughout the ages to answer unanswerable questions.
I would say "miracle" is one of you guys' most-feared words in the English language.
I notice you guys don't like to use it, even in context.
Oh, my.And I like "magic" better.
I would say "miracle" is one of you guys' most-laughable words in the English language.
I notice you guys don't like to use it, even in context.
Oh, my.
Thank you for the QED.
I'm not going to report you for that because your Recent Visitors field looks like a string of Christmas lights.Fixed that for you
I'm not going to report you for that because your Recent Visitors field looks like a string of Christmas lights.
[You're welcome.]
Here is a simple challenge for you. Find some evidence outside of your book of myth that supports your claims.
You do realize that biology says there was no flood, don't you?
So since you lose all arguments legitimate or not you have to run and tattle.
That is fine with me. It is simply another admission that you have lost.
Dear SZ, Sure. For more than 99% of the time since man diverged from Chimps, he remained like an animal, looking for something to eat and a place to sleep. SUDDENLY some 10k years ago, farmers began to grow crops, which brought on homebuilding, city building, and EVERY other trait of modern Humans.
Here is the evidence of the SUDDEN arrival of farmers, which brought Human civilization to this Planet. In LESS than 1% of the time since man first roamed this Earth, we have gone from Caves to the Moon and back. Evols refuse to believe this since it is empirical evidence which refutes their false assumptions. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE
I predict you will hand wave and call names but in the end you will be totally unable to explain this Scientitic and Historic Fact, which exposes the incomplete data which Evols have falsely assumed.
BTW, There has NEVER been a Global Flood on our Planet. The Global Flood which totally destroyed Adam's world, destroyed a much smaller world than our present Cosmos...BUT...it did happen EXACTLY as God told us it did, some 10k years ago, and Noah came to our world which was NOT destroyed in the Flood.
That is HOW prehistoric people inherited the Human intelligence of Adam. Like Cain, on Adam's world, Noah's grandsons had NO other Humans to marry, so they married and produced children with the DNA of the common ancestor of Apes, and with the Human intelligence of Adam, who never stepped foot on our Earth. We, the 7 Billion living Humans on Earth today, are those children.
In Love,
Aman
Maybe you need to read what I wrote again, scientist.
I said I am NOT going to report you.
What did you think I said?You are right. My mistake and I apologize. I thought that you were making a threat.
It wouldn't make sense if you read it as:I'm not going to report you for that because your Recent Visitors field looks like a string of Christmas lights.
[You're welcome.]
I'm going to report you because you've been "visited" already?I'm going to report you for that because your Recent Visitors field looks like a string of Christmas lights.
[You're welcome.]
Ever hear of the little Grand Canyon that was formed in a very short time frame? Complete with stratified walls.
What did you think I said?
Here's what I said:
It wouldn't make sense if you read it as:
I'm going to report you because you've been "visited" already?
That doesn't even make sense.
And why would I say, "You're welcome," if I was reporting you?
Anyone can overlook the word "not" in a person's post; but if it throws the rest of the post out of context, wouldn't the SM thing to do is at least go back over it?
... Whatever.
He apologized, av, why you have to keep pushing? ;-)
I would say "miracle" is one of you guys' most-feared words in the English language.
I notice you guys don't like to use it, even in context.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?