What Would Falsify the Flood?

[AV1611VET]

No need. I know what you denied.


Then you contradicted yourself.


I will let it stand there.

What's wrong?

Don't want to research your own words?

Isn't that what scientists are known for? research?

As I said, I'll be more than happy to do it for you.

You see, I know what you said ... you don't.

That's what happens when one ridicules; they forget their own words.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What's wrong?

Don't want to research your own words?

Isn't that what scientists are known for? research?

As I said, I'll be more than happy to do it for you.

The research has already been done.

There is no need to do it again.

 

[AV1611VET]

The research has already been done.

There is no need to do it again.

Fair enough.

 

[Split Rock]

Ever hear of the little Grand Canyon that was formed in a very short time frame? Complete with stratified walls.

Yeah.. Made of Volcanic Ash, and with sides sloped at 45 degrees.
CH581.1: Mount St. Helens canyon and the Grand Canyon

I note that you ignored my point about the results of carving into soft sediments.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What's wrong?

Don't want to research your own words?

Isn't that what scientists are known for? research?

As I said, I'll be more than happy to do it for you.

You see, I know what you said ... you don't.

That's what happens when one ridicules; they forget their own words.

By the way, I know what I said too. The ridiculed often cannot see how they are wrong.

 

[AV1611VET]

The ridiculed often cannot see how they are wrong.

I don't mean to ridicule you.

But you talk "scientific method," while doing anything but.

For once, I'd like to see a scientific methodist use this method constructively to properly evaluate someone who dares disagree with them.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I don't mean to ridicule you.

That is okay, you really only ridiculed yourself.

But you talk "scientific method," while doing anything but.

For once, I'd like to see a scientific methodist use this method constructively to properly evaluate someone who dares disagree with them.

We do all of the time.

Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the scientific method.

And you are terribly far afield from the topic of this thread.

What would falsify the flood?

 

[AV1611VET]

What would falsify the flood?

Nephilim

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nephilim

Sorry, wrong. Mythological creatures do not count.

You need something real.

Besides, I thought that you believed that Goliath might have been part Nephilim.

How could that have happened without Nephy's surviving the flood?

You are being inconsistent. But don't worry, all creationists are.

 

[AV1611VET]

Besides, I thought that you believed that Goliath might have been part Nephilim.

How could that have happened without Nephy's surviving the flood?

You are being inconsistent. But don't worry, all creationists are.

And how did I justify Goliath being a Nephilim, when all the Nephilim were destroyed in the Flood, Mr. Scientific Methodist?

(We'll see who's being 'inconsistent.')

 

[mzungu]

Nephilim

Nephilim can take a hike!

 

[AV1611VET]

And how did I justify Goliath being a Nephilim, when all the Nephilim were destroyed in the Flood, Mr. Scientific Methodist?

Hey, scientist, while you're doing some real research for a change and looking up how I justified Goliath, can you answer me this?

If all eight aboard the Ark had brown eyes, how is it we have people with green eyes now?

(If you can answer that, you'll know how I justified Goliath.)

 

[Subduction Zone]

Hey, scientist, while you're doing some real research for a change and looking up how I justified Goliath, can you answer me this?

If all eight aboard the Ark had brown eyes, how is it we have people with green eyes now?

(If you can answer that, you'll know how I justified Goliath.)

How is it scientific to study your past failures?

I simply brought up the fact that you contradicted yourself.

And no, you cannot justify it with your brown eyes green eyes claim. I am sure that Nephilism is not just one gene.

 

[mzungu]

Hey, scientist, while you're doing some real research for a change and looking up how I justified Goliath, can you answer me this?

If all eight aboard the Ark had brown eyes, how is it we have people with green eyes now?

(If you can answer that, you'll know how I justified Goliath.)

Simple: there was no Ark!

 

[Aman777]

Simple: there was no Ark!

Dear mzungu, Correction: The was an Ark and the Flood totally destroyed the firmament of Adam, exactly as God told us it did. It is YOUR interpretation which is obviously in error. It's caused by the clouding of your vision by the darkness.

IF there was NO Ark, there would NEVER have been ANY humans on our Planet Earth, since that's how Adam's descendants escaped the first world. which was "clean dissolved" Isaiah 24:19 in the Flood. Don't believe me, then tell us HOW and WHEN evolution produced human intelligence in Apes. Like all other Evols, you will fail miserably. But go ahead and TRY.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Subduction Zone]

Dear mzungu, Correction: The was an Ark and the Flood totally destroyed the firmament of Adam, exactly as God told us it did. It is YOUR interpretation which is obviously in error. It's caused by the clouding of your vision by the darkness.

IF there was NO Ark, there would NEVER have been ANY humans on our Planet Earth, since that's how Adam's descendants escaped the first world. which was "clean dissolved" Isaiah 24:19 in the Flood. Don't believe me, then tell us HOW and WHEN evolution produced human intelligence in Apes. Like all other Evols, you will fail miserably. But go ahead and TRY.

In Love,
Aman

Here is a simple challenge for you. Find some evidence outside of your book of myth that supports your claims.

You do realize that biology says there was no flood, don't you?

 

[Loudmouth]

According to the cladistics yes, but then by those rules we are fish. I am not disagreeing with that at all. It just matters how you define "reptiles".

What I love about cladistics is that it takes away the creationist claim of "kind after kind".

The Tree of Life web project has Synapsids (mammals and mammal-like reptiles) and Reptilia as separate branches.

Amniota

Dinosaurs are Diapsids with the rest of the crocs, lizards, and birds.

 

[Atheos canadensis]

Ever hear of the little Grand Canyon that was formed in a very short time frame? Complete with stratified walls.

The issue still remains that the meandering shape of the entire GC (not merely the Colorado river at the bottom) is utterly inconsistent with the Flood model. We know from actual observations that catastrophic flows produce straight, wide, flat-bottomed channels. For the Flood model to account for the GC, you have to explain how a high-energy, high-volume flow could produce a meandering canyon. Spoiler: you can't do this unless you can prove that the laws of physics were different in the past.

 

[Black Akuma]

The issue still remains that the meandering shape of the entire GC (not merely the Colorado river at the bottom) is utterly inconsistent with the Flood model. We know from actual observations that catastrophic flows produce straight, wide, flat-bottomed channels. For the Flood model to account for the GC, you have to explain how a high-energy, high-volume flow could produce a meandering canyon. Spoiler: you can't do this unless you can prove that the laws of physics were different in the past.

I'd also like an explanation for how alluvial deposits formed in the middle of this
Flood.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I'd also like an explanation for how alluvial deposits formed in the middle of this
Flood.

And on a related note how about how salt formed in the middle of the flood. Not when it was being "dried up".