Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
By your same reasoning, the suggestion of the following image that Odin exists is true:
Their existence would falsify the Flood, since the Flood was designed to destroy them.
And you would certainly know if they existed or not.
The fact that they are gone, shows the Flood to have been not only real, but worldwide.
He might even be a nephil himself! It might have been a dark family secret, like being a Jew in Nazi Germany. You would certainly want to keep it a secret lest God should realize that he had left a few around and wipe out the whole human race again.Excellent point -- and unlike a Nephilim, AV would probably recognize an Ice Giant if he saw one.
A Nephilim, however, AV wouldn't recognize if it jumped out of a cake -- for all he knows, he could be living in the Nephilim neighborhood...
What would convince you you had no mother?What would convince you that there had been no flood?
No! I asked how water in one state, such as the former state...could have behaved as if it were in this state!!!So now you're saying that water behaved back then just as it does now. You've just debunked your own "different state past" argument.
Now you know how diabolical plagiarism works, don't you?By your same reasoning, the suggestion of the following image that Odin exists is true:
You know that's not true, don't you?AV1611VET, were he being corrected by God himself, has indicated that he would call God a liar,
But let's hear from some other inundators: What would sink your ark?
No! I asked how water in one state, such as the former state...could have behaved as if it were in this state!!!
What would convince you that there had been no flood?
What would convince you you had no mother?
No! I asked how water in one state, such as the former state...could have behaved as if it were in this state!!!
What he knows or doesn't know isn't the issue. Did you or did you not write that you would call God a liar if the account in the Bible were not literally true? Think carefully! I think I still have that link. It was a long time ago, but ... memorable. You have artfully dodged the question. You can answer truthfully, or lie, but unless you are completely dishonest you will have to live with the truthfull answer in this world or with the lie in the next. Or ... and this will cause you the least trouble, you can simply ignore the question. The truth will earn you the scorn of your fellow Christians. The lie will earn you my scorn, which I know you don't care about, and God's, which I suspect that you don't care about either.You know that's not true, don't you? If otherwise, please provide a link.
So you didn't want me to answer. OK.So you're not going to answer the question. I think I already indicated that you wouldn't. I therefore asked for answers from others.
Constants were constant since this state started I assume. They would not change. Whatever changed left us with out constants!You are never very clear about that, dad. What constants or laws have changed? Exactly how was this mysterious state different?
That may have been me. I did get silly one time and say something like that if God went and told me His word was a lie, I would kick His butt.What he knows or doesn't know isn't the issue. Did you or did you not write that you would call God a liar if the account in the Bible were not literally true? Think carefully! I think I still have that link.
Now you want me to answer. You evos change like the wind.Dad and AV1611VET having formally declined to answer the original question:
If it was not in God's word. Easy.What evidence would convince you there had never been a global, Noachian flood? The floor is open to others.
Dad and AV1611VET having formally declined to answer the original question: What evidence would convince you there had never been a global, Noachian flood? The floor is open to others.
Exactly! That is why the evos trounced him six ways from Sunday. However, when we add the actual nature that was in place to some of his ideas, it looks quite good. (no need for any hydro plate stuff either)A very good question -- one which your friend Walt completely fails to take into account, since his models assume a same state past.
Here's your bologna, scientist:Did you or did you not write that you would call God a liar if the account in the Bible were not literally true? Think carefully! I think I still have that link. It was a long time ago, but ... memorable. You have artfully dodged the question. You can answer truthfully, or lie, but unless you are completely dishonest you will have to live with the truthfull answer in this world or with the lie in the next. Or ... and this will cause you the least trouble, you can simply ignore the question. The truth will earn you the scorn of your fellow Christians. The lie will earn you my scorn, which I know you don't care about, and God's, which I suspect that you don't care about either.
That's a far cry from:A question for you: If god told you to do something that was in direct contridiction to the bible, would you do it? And I know what you're going to say 'bible is gods word, cant contridict it, blab blah'. Set that aside and work in the hypothetical to answer this question.
Hypothetically --- I'd say, "Get thee behind me, Satan."
... but typical of scientists Arab phoning everything we say.AV1611VET, were he being corrected by God himself, has indicated that he would call God a liar,
Nephilim.Dad and AV1611VET having formally declined to answer the original question: What evidence would convince you there had never been a global, Noachian flood? The floor is open to others.
Exactly! That is why the evos trounced him six ways from Sunday. However, when we add the actual nature that was in place to some of his ideas, it looks quite good. (no need for any hydro plate stuff either)
Here's your bologna, scientist:
That's a far cry from:
... but typical of scientists Arab phoning everything we say.
Care to retract your junk?
I consulted his book actually. It was the first thing on creation science I read. Since there was some weakness, I ventured to try to find out where the problem lied.I see -- so Walt should've consulted you before presenting his ideas to the public, then?
I consulted his book actually. It was the first thing on creation science I read. Since there was some weakness, I ventured to try to find out where the problem lied.
One could hardly blame him since all of science does the same. Thankfully, the truth of the matter is finally coming out. After all, what else could it possibly be? Not like God is a liar or anything.And the only weakness you found was that he completely misread the workings of the universe back then?
Well, as long as it wasn't anything major...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?