Believe me - You are deeply mistaken if you think that image never moves or is always stationary when I look at it
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All people (and probably animals too) have the propensity to believe that this isn't a still image, simply by looking at it:
What's holding you back from getting yours?The question would still have to be asked
is there or is there not a god. No one has evidence only personal experience.
1. Modern medicine - Defeats creationisms on the fact that yes bacteria and viruses evolve.
That is why in general there is always a need to produce a new flu vaccine every so often.
2. The human genome/dna - We are related to everything on the planet only thing is our dna
is slightly more different.
3 4 and 5 , - only really listed just to disprove the young earth belief.
I would suppose that creationism could be falsified the same way evolutionism could. Both views use the same evidence.
Since abiogenesis has already been discussed we could start there.
Empherical science states that life only comes from life. (The Law of Biogenesis)
Evolution states that life came from non-living matter.
No, it is not a mistake. In this situation, all the elements which need to be used are based on ad hoc knowledge that if not available would make it impossible to form life. No where on earth are we aware of life coming from non-living matter or chemicals. We do have ad hoc information that could aid us in producing life (theoretically) by using that information and knowledge on how chemicals react. However, chemicals do not react naturally in the way they would need to if they were to create life. So it takes intelligence to make it work if it ever works at all.
Once again it is your lack of knowledge in Biology that renders your argument inadequate.
I don't need to ask anyone. God has no creator. It is in the natural world alone that cause and effect are present.
Reply to post #306 (sorry, but I lost the quote somehow in my reply).
I kind of like the description of the work of scientists in the new Evolution's Achilles Heels DVD, where it says that scientists are like a dog following a scent, zig-zagging along the way but only very occasionally getting things right. That's why their text books change so often and why the stuff we are told is true today is discarded later on.
I have another DVD, which is quite interesting. It's entitled "Artistic Ape Anecdotes: The Art of Deception?" The blurb on the back goes on, "Dr Batten deals with the claimed 'apeman' fossils in the evolutionary tree as promoted by the Smithsonian Institute and he shows the stories do not match the facts. The fossil patterns fit a post-Flood dispersal of apes and a somewhat later post-Babel dispersal of humans. Also shows how detailed illustrations are imaginatively created from fragmentary fossils."
To answer your question. The "so many Gods" your referring to are basically demons that follow Satan in his rebellion against God. The Bible refers to: "Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe." So you have just done an effective job of showing that the Bible is true. I have studied some Greek Mythology and I have studied the Bible and I can assure you that there is no comparison. If your confused it is because you have not actually studied either mythology or the Bible.
I did and do you know what science told me? If you eat right, exercise, control your stress and maintain healthy relationships you will stay healthy and you will not need a doctor.
Education is a problem for creationists.
interesting graph.
question:
if you wanted to host a truly unbiased conference on evolution/creation, what country would you host it in?
I think you need to differentiate between the concept of creationism and the concept of creationism introduced in the Bible. Even if you could prove the Bible false, that would not refute the concept of creationism as a concept.
Believe me - You are deeply mistaken if you think that image never moves or is always stationary when I look at it
That's because creation has nothing whatsoever to do with evolution, creation must be finished before evolution can begin.but evolution and creation are not.
Put your hand over most of the image and you will see that it doesn't move, the illusion only happens when you view most or the whole image, or fix your eyes on part of the image, our brains are playing tricks on us.Believe me - You are deeply mistaken if you think that image never moves or is always stationary when I look at it
I would suppose that creationism could be falsified the same way evolutionism could. Both views use the same evidence.
Since abiogenesis has already been discussed we could start there.
Empherical science states that life only comes from life. (The Law of Biogenesis)
Evolution states that life came from non-living matter.
Creation states that life came from a living intelligent Creator.
Empherical science states that complex specific information only comes from intelligence.
Evolution states that the complex codes such as DNA arose from non-intelligence.
Creation states that an all wise Creator programmed DNA to reproduce, repair and make changes to accommodate outside pressures.
Empherical science has only observed animals coming from the same kind of animals.
Evolution states that animals change kinds in an upward, unguided, more complex direction.
If we were to go by just what science has observed then clearly evolution would be falsified.
However, creation's tenants are supported by science.
It's called optical illusion.
It's a still image, not an animated gif.
It's a still image.
NO its not an optical illusion......mine moves when I scroll and adjust to get to see all of it. Like I said Believe me you are mistaken if you think that image never moves or is always stationary when I look at it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?