Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are all those theatrics always necessary? This is why I tend to stay away from where atheists and Theists debate because you tend to get rather ugly with each other
He has already clarified what he meant
and you are rather pettily ignoring his point in order to attack his intelligence
I've already covered this in my birds with boobs thread.
I directly addressed his point.
"Evolution of humans from a single celled ancestor is also life from life."
The only attack on intelligence is being perpetrated by creationists who are trying to convince us that people completely ignorant of biology know more than 99.9% of degreed biologists.
It is obvious to any unbiased person he is talking about life from non life.
He states as much in his clarification. You have no credible answer for abiogenesis as you have already admitted to me.
You don't know what he is completely ignorant of and if you keep up with this insulting pedigree you will just derail the thread with nastiness.
Is all the avoidance necessary?
I directly addressed his point.
"Evolution of humans from a single celled ancestor is also life from life."
The only attack on intelligence is being perpetrated by creationists who are trying to convince us that people completely ignorant of biology know more than 99.9% of degreed biologists.
I never meant to insult your intelligence so I apologize. I also was referring to abiogenesis in all of my posts.
The two are unrelated. If the God created the first simple cell that evolved into all the species we see today, the theory of evolution would be unchanged.
He didn't think that humans could come from a single cell. I think that speaks volumes.
I never meant to insult your intelligence so I apologize. I also was referring to abiogenesis in all of my posts. either way I dont think this is going anywhere so lets call it a day
No, you weren't. You asked how all life could evolve from a universal common ancestor that was a single cell:
"This is describing the theory of macroevolution, or species changing into other species like somehow all of life originated from a single cell."--bhayes, post 215
Welcome to CF, Dpierre!Gee Whiz dude. give it up. he already clarified what he meant from that and went to the totally unnecessary step of apologizing and you are still on a war path ungraciously still coming at him. Whatever you got going on in your life its not his fault.
What two?
i did not specify abiogenesis in relationship to evolution.
You have the habit of thinking everything must fit into your evolution creation ego war you have going but creation goes beyond evolution. I need not limit it.
I think your acidity speaks volume. I am a creationists so please feel free on that basis to call me dumb so I can hit the report button. I have little tolerance for this childish insult everyone who disagrees me behaviour in what was a civil conversation.
Gee Whiz dude. give it up. he already clarified what he meant from that and went to the totally unnecessary step of apologizing and you are still on a war path ungraciously still coming at him. Whatever you got going on in your life its not his fault.
Well because it is not the same thing is it? If we are saying that two living beings such as humans procreated then yes life comes from life. But you are not saying that. You are saying that there was a cell, somehow nobody knows where it came from. It reproduced how? and somehow survived the environment of the earth and over billions of years formed complex organisms that somehow evolved from each other yet today not one single type of this has been observed.
Abiogenesis and evolution are two independent theories.
It was clear that the poster was talking about evolution, but you tried to turn it into a conversation about abiogenesis.
Ego is when people with no scientific knowledge proclaim that 99.9% of scientists are wrong because of a story in a 2,000 year old book.
Sorry they are both included in creationism under one banner along with the creation of the universe (so nah not evebn the two).
Poster already stated as i suspected he was talking about abiogenesis.
You sure will have zero credibility claiming to know what was in his head more than he does. Are you calling him a liar?
No ego is what we are seeing in your angry posts. Having a really bad day? or is this kind of standard for you?
If bhayes says that there is no problem with all life evolving through natural mechanisms from a shared single celled ancestor over billions of years, we can happily move on.
Or what? You going to hold the whole thread hostage to your will if he doesn't agree. I don't and won't so go for it mate
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?