Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you think it is higher, it reduces the range of the electromagnetic force even further; basic plasma physics.You're "assuming" that plasma density can be easily estimated down to a single number, everywhere. Current carrying plasma doesn't work like that.
I asked you a question about a ternary system of galaxies held together by electromagnetic forces and this is your response.......Well, for starters, Birkeland's model presumes that the surface of every sun is charged negatively compared to "space", and the discovery that the vast majority of cosmic rays are positively charged would tend to support that model.
If you think it is higher, it reduces the range of the electromagnetic force even further; basic plasma physics.
I asked you a question about a ternary system of galaxies held together by electromagnetic forces and this is your response.......
You don't have a clue and the use of word salad only enhances your lack of comprehension not disguises it.That's not actually how it works in current carrying plasma however. Plasma threads tend to attract one another, and they direct the flow of mass through them as well.
More word salad.The idea is that stars have a net negative surface charge and would tend to repulse one another, as would a collection of stars in various galaxies.
You don't have a clue and the use of word salad only enhances your lack of comprehension not disguises it.
More word salad.
The word repulsion is the reason why three bodies or more whether they be galaxies or stars cannot be held together by EM forces which not even possible due to the limited range.
From this data we derive the magnetoplasma and electrodynamic parameters of this 50 kpc long jet
Confirmation you don't have a clue since the EM force is not an electric current.
An electric current does not generate an EM force.The electric current generate EM force! Oy Vey.
An electric current does not generate an EM force.
You clearly don't understand what an electric current is which in layman's terms is the movement of charge.
When there is no electric current, the charges don't disappear as charge is conserved hence the EM force between accelerated charges exists with or without a current.
Seriously, a field is not a force. This is not quibbling over details, it's basic physics.... a magnetic field that is also part of the EM force.
...
You're quibbling over details IMO. Ok, but that doesn't change the fact that the movement of current though the filament generates a magnetic field around the filament.
Seriously, a field is not a force. This is not quibbling over details, it's basic physics.
Which is not an EM force.You're quibbling over details IMO. Ok, but that doesn't change the fact that the movement of current though the filament generates a magnetic field around the filament.
I'm not sure whether you're pretending not to understand or whether you really don't understand this simple point... Where does that article say a magnetic field is an EM force?Electromagnetic force - Energy Education
While he's technically correct that the EM force acts on charged particles that move or don't move, it's still a force either way.
I'm not sure whether you're pretending not to understand or whether you really don't understand this simple point... Where does that article say a magnetic field is an EM force?
It's called the electromagnetic force because it includes the formerly distinct electric force and the magnetic force; magnetic forces and electric forces are really the same fundamental force.[1]
Which is not an EM force.
Do you think you get a Lorentz force between parallel wires when a current passes through only one wire?
That sentence is all about forces, not fields. Fields and forces are not the same things.Right here:It's called the electromagnetic force because it includes the formerly distinct electric force and the magnetic force; magnetic forces and electric forces are really the same fundamental force.[1]
He is making irrelevant responses as elsewhere in this thread much like the Chewbacca defense.That sentence is all about forces, not fields. Fields and forces are not the same things.
How do you expect to argue anything in physics if you don't know such fundamentals?
Yes; he posts lots of stuff gleaned from various sources that look vaguely scientific, but every now and then there'll be a couple of posts so fundamentally mistaken in basic physics one would think a five-year-old had borrowed daddy's keyboard...He is making irrelevant responses as elsewhere in this thread much like the Chewbacca defense.
That sentence is all about forces, not fields. Fields and forces are not the same things.
How do you expect to argue anything in physics if you don't know such fundamentals?
Yes; he posts lots of stuff gleaned from various sources that look vaguely scientific, but every now and then there'll be a couple of posts so fundamentally mistaken in basic physics one would think a five-year-old had borrowed daddy's keyboard...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?