Hi MT,
I don't have a plan for the 59%.
Hi HL,
I was just wondering. It is apparently just a matter of degree that is being argued here and degree of what, is the question. While you disparage the Democratic party for its 'left leaning ideology', there seems to also be quite a bit of 'left leaning ideology' also running about in the hearts and minds of many Republicans. So, the question must be asked, "Is this issue really about Democrat vs. Republican or is it rather just about some of each party that don't fit with an individual's particular ideology".
In Jan. 2018, President Trump, after enacting a very large tax cut and thus reducing federal revenues by billions of dollars, began to come out against what are seen by some as 'welfare social programs'. However, his efforts were quickly quashed by the fact that there wasn't a lot of Republican support to do so. Many Republican held legislative districts have poor people counted among their number. Many of those Republican legislators did not want to cut federal funding to programs that did, in fact, directly help many of their own constituents.
So again, the question must be asked as to whether this is really a us vs. them Democrat/Republican issue or whether its just a matter of one individual's perspective that makes it seem that way? There appear to be some with 'left leaning ideologies' in both parties. Now, I will admit that the Democratic party has long been known as the party that supports the welfare of the people in general as opposed to the Republican party, which is generally supportive of the welfare of business. However, there is a middle ground within that opposition. We just need to find it.
It seems that the ACA was the real impetus that has pushed this us vs. them mentality of seeing the Democrats and the Republicans as some sort of arch enemies. That's sad. But the current rhetoric is only strengthening that idea rather than trying to bring us back to center. Our current leader not being willing to work with the legislature as a whole body also isn't helping and that is something that is fairly unique to his administration. However, it does fit perfectly with his known nature. His continued and oft repeated disparaging remarks against nearly half of the people over which he governs (Democrats) isn't helping the matter either. But then Donald J. Trump has never been one to work well with others.
He is on record that he prefers working with a body of people who are anxious and cut throat concerning one another and so that is exactly the kind of atmosphere that he seeks to create in all of this. In that, he has done an excellent job. If I were giving grades to presidents on their ability to divide the nation, President Trump gets an A+++++.
That's
my understanding of the present situation and for me, I'd like to see that change. That may make me a 'left leaner' in your understanding, and frankly, I'm perfectly ok with that. I've long gotten over being offended much by name calling. Maybe you also will one day come to the realization that it really works better when we all try to work together. But that generally means that no one is going to always get their way. Living in a society is always going to involve some give and take, or else we get a unitary autocracy. A form of governance in which one person holds supreme power over the rules and laws of a nation.
That may work fine for those who agree with the autocratic leader, but what happens 4 or 8 years later when a new leader comes into power and then asserts his sole authority over the nation? Our nation was established to be run by a three branch system of governance in which no single branch could wield absolute power. Each branch has the ability to check another and I believe that has worked well for at least a couple of hundred years. There really is a reason that President Trump admires Kim and Xi and Putin. They hold the kind of power over government that he wishes he had. But, our Constitution doesn't allow for that eventuality.
God bless,
In Christ, ted