• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What we are NOT told about Fukushima Daiichi

lesjude

Newbie
Apr 11, 2012
285
3
✟22,957.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is the most comprehensive article I have read on the real potential for world wide nuclear disaster and the how/why it could happen. Actually it has already started. It is a long article and as I sometimes told my very bright high school students it may tire your fingers and lips. This is an issue for Christian intercession.


Fukushima Daiichi: From Nuclear Power Plant to Nuclear Weapon


By Prof. Anthony Hall
Global Research, June 13, 2012
URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31401
 

WinBySurrender

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2011
3,670
155
.
✟4,924.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
This is the most comprehensive article I have read on the real potential for world wide nuclear disaster and the how/why it could happen. Actually it has already started. It is a long article and as I sometimes told my very bright high school students it may tire your fingers and lips. This is an issue for Christian intercession.


Fukushima Daiichi: From Nuclear Power Plant to Nuclear Weapon


By Prof. Anthony Hall
Global Research, June 13, 2012
URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31401
This is the same Dr. Anthony Hall who believes the Bush administration plotted and carried out 9/11 internally, and who got caught as one of the major fabricators of "facts proving" global warming. There is no length to which this man will not go to promote his fallacious theories of the "dangers" of nuclear power, global warming or any other pseudo-green agenda that furthers his unhinged philosophies.
 
Upvote 0
Dec 6, 2011
381
24
California
✟23,164.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
China's looked at it and is building 153 new nuclear plants right now. For all the Fukashima hype, not one radiation death yet. We readily accept dozens of fossil fuel deaths, but run for the hills if anyone whispers "radiation." We're our own worst enemy. China's going to kick our butt with their "too cheap to meter" nuclear power.
 
Upvote 0

IisJustMe

He rescued me because He delighted in me (Ps18:19)
Jun 23, 2006
14,270
1,888
Blue Springs, Missouri
✟23,494.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Aw, and I was REALLY hoping to read something about Godzilla in this thread...
I thought we buried him in the last movie. Oh, wait ... also in the one before that, and the one before that, and the one ...

Never mind.
 
Upvote 0
L

Lovely Lane

Guest
This is the most comprehensive article I have read on the real potential for world wide nuclear disaster and the how/why it could happen. Actually it has already started. It is a long article and as I sometimes told my very bright high school students it may tire your fingers and lips. This is an issue for Christian intercession.


Fukushima Daiichi: From Nuclear Power Plant to Nuclear Weapon


By Prof. Anthony Hall
Global Research, June 13, 2012
URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31401
thanks lestjude, I like those guy's at Global Research.
Japan incinerating debris is news to me, wonder if that destroys half-life radiation or spread it further by wind.
 
Upvote 0
Dec 6, 2011
381
24
California
✟23,164.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Still zero dead from Fukushima radiation. Can't say zero dead at the fossil fuel plant next door. I'll gladly live next door to a nuclear plant, if you liberal's will live next to a fossil fuel plant. Heck, I'd live next to a nuclear plant anyway. Probably isn't a safer spot on the planet.

.
 
Upvote 0
L

Lovely Lane

Guest
Still zero dead from Fukushima radiation. Can't say zero dead at the fossil fuel plant next door. I'll gladly live next door to a nuclear plant, if you liberal's will live next to a fossil fuel plant. Heck, I'd live next to a nuclear plant anyway. Probably isn't a safer spot on the planet.

.
so, when are you moving?
 
Upvote 0

IisJustMe

He rescued me because He delighted in me (Ps18:19)
Jun 23, 2006
14,270
1,888
Blue Springs, Missouri
✟23,494.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I am related to a former nuclear power plant licensed operator and rad waste supervisor. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Ah-hem. Excuse me for interrupting, but having a relative who works in nuclear power doesn't exactly mean you are an expert, does it?

I have a relative who is a petroleum geologist. He talks, I listen, I pick up things. But I'm not an expert and wouldn't try to begin to speak from the limited knowledge I have in holding conversations with him.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
lesjude said:
I am related to a former nuclear power plant licensed operator and rad waste supervisor. You have no idea what you are talking about.

Eh?

Part of the conversation was about living close to a nuclear station. I just mentioned that I grew up living close to one. How can I not know about that? You think I'm delusional about the geography of my birthplace?
 
Upvote 0

lesjude

Newbie
Apr 11, 2012
285
3
✟22,957.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Eh?

Part of the conversation was about living close to a nuclear station. I just mentioned that I grew up living close to one. How can I not know about that? You think I'm delusional about the geography of my birthplace?
No, "delusional" about the safety of nuclear power plants.
 
Upvote 0

lesjude

Newbie
Apr 11, 2012
285
3
✟22,957.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ah-hem. Excuse me for interrupting, but having a relative who works in nuclear power doesn't exactly mean you are an expert, does it?

I have a relative who is a petroleum geologist. He talks, I listen, I pick up things. But I'm not an expert and wouldn't try to begin to speak from the limited knowledge I have in holding conversations with him.
Operator means operated the reactor. Rad waste supervisor means responsible for disposal of ALL radio active waste. He does know from the inside about safety issues. There are three nuclear plants on a fault line in northern NY and one is one of the 2 oldest in the nation still in operation.
It is licensed until 2029 when it will be 60 years old. This is safe? Or is it about something else.
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi lesjude,

You wrote: It is licensed until 2029 when it will be 60 years old. This is safe? Or is it about something else

Well, in the realm of concrete and steel structures, 60 years isn't particularly old. The empire state building was built in 1931 and is now over 80 years old. As far as I know there are no serious structural defects with it. The golden gate bridge has now been standing for some 75 years and still carries thousands upon thousands of vehicles every day. Carrying literally mega-tons of weight and has successfully withstood all of San Franciso's earthquakes, so far. The Hoover dam which holds back millions of tons of water weight has stood since 1936.

When we speak of structural age, the question that is most important is whether or not the structure was built to withstand all the trials that it is expected to endure. The part of a nuclear reactor that contains the risk is encased within concrete walls several feet thick. Even today, when we build new reactors, these structures are still built of concrete and steel. If they are designed properly there really isn't any reason that the structures themselves won't endure hundreds of years.

However, at some point technology changes so much that old designs aren't necessarily unsafe, but are no longer design suitable for the new technologies used. At that point, the reactor is allowed to shut-down. The spent fuel rods are removed and the old containment structure is demolished and a new one built, often on the same site.

Nuclear energy is 'reasonably' safe and new controls and designs are instituted as they become known. I applaud your relative for his long years in the nuclear energy industry and I'm sure that some of his concerns may be valid so far as new construction, but as has been demonstrated in both the Chernobyl and Fukushima reactor accidents, human life is not in particularly grave danger when these things happen.

We didn't have bodies lined up across the plains of Russia nor did we have bodies stacked like cordwood around Fukushima. Were the accidents of concern when they happened? Sure. As are derailed train accidents when they happen. The greatest death toll by an industry at one time was the methyl isocyanate leak in Bhopal, India. The jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh has accounted 3,787 confirmed deaths as a direct result of the leak.

Yes, we need the NRC making regular checks of safety manuevers and proceedures. Yes, we need to continue to make the production of nuclear energy safer as technology becomes available, but I don't think anyone running around like Chicken Little declaring that the sky is falling is of any real value to the cause at hand.

Be advised, however, that a nuclear accident is not what will bring about the end of this world.

Just my thoughts.
God bless you.
IN Christ, Ted
 
Upvote 0

IisJustMe

He rescued me because He delighted in me (Ps18:19)
Jun 23, 2006
14,270
1,888
Blue Springs, Missouri
✟23,494.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Operator means operated the reactor. Rad waste supervisor means responsible for disposal of ALL radio active waste. He does know from the inside about safety issues. There are three nuclear plants on a fault line in northern NY and one is one of the 2 oldest in the nation still in operation.
It is licensed until 2029 when it will be 60 years old. This is safe? Or is it about something else.
I know what your relative does. No need to spell it out. However, that still doesn't translate to you having the knowledge of the subject that would approach description as "authority."
 
Upvote 0

SQLservant

Newbie
Dec 20, 2011
380
18
✟23,092.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
When we speak of structural age, the question that is most important is whether or not the structure was built to withstand all the trials that it is expected to endure. The part of a nuclear reactor that contains the risk is encased within concrete walls several feet thick. Even today, when we build new reactors, these structures are still built of concrete and steel. If they are designed properly there really isn't any reason that the structures themselves won't endure hundreds of years.

Very true. The Starrucca Viaduct in northern Pennsylvania opened in 1848. It continues to carry heavy rail traffic today.

The Pennsylvania Center for the Book - Starrucca Viaduct
 
Upvote 0