Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I've been on vacation like three times with the family, once to Opryland and twice to Gatlinburg.Have you gone on vacation and if so
Where did you go to?
Yep. It was excellent.Really? I used to live in Newport. In a log home it was awesome! Have you been to Dollywood too ince you've gone to Gatlinburg?
We're pretty close, but the relationship has been just a wee bit strained since I came out as an unbeliever. We still talk, though, and he still loves me, so it's cool.So you vacationed with your family? Cool. What kind of relationship do you have with your father?
That's good. Having a relationship with your father is one of the best things in life. Do you like the fact that he is part of your life?We're pretty close, but the relationship has been just a wee bit strained since I came out as an unbeliever. We still talk, though, and he still loves me, so it's cool.![]()
I can see that you are refusing to let God influence you. It seems that you are choosing to ignore the magnificence of His creation simply because you can't comprehend it or let go of the fact that man is not always in control. I think science is man's tool to explain things when he has no faith in what he can not see.Yes.
The natural world is a beautiful thing, there is no doubt about that, but I see no reason why we should attribute it to the work of any deity, least of all that of the Christian faith, simply because of this beauty. After all, science has already explained so much of it, and in time, it will have explained it all, thus eliminating the need for a creator god.
I disagree. It wasn't just because it was popular. Herod wanted him killed because he knew the prophecies, people traveled from all over to see him, Jesus impacted the entire Earth during his life here. It is a definite pivot point in our timeline and it's not just hearsay.Also, the stuff about Jesus and how our dating is based on his birth isn't really an argument for god, just an argument for how mad popular Christianity was around the time they put that system into effect.
No, you got it confused. Science is man's tool to understand the things that he does see; the things that he cannot see, however, are subject strictly to the individual man's reason and choice of belief. Science must ignore these things, and it does not make a decision on their existence, one way or the other. Anything else would not be science.I can see that you are refusing to let God influence you. It seems that you are choosing to ignore the magnificence of His creation simply because you can't comprehend it or let go of the fact that man is not always in control. I think science is man's tool to explain things when he has no faith in what he can not see.
He did make an impact, but that is in no way proof of his divinity.I disagree. It wasn't just because it was popular. Herod wanted him killed because he knew the prophecies, people traveled from all over to see him, Jesus impacted the entire Earth during his life here. It is a definite pivot point in our timeline and it's not just hearsay.
Well, those last statements weren't evidence of divinity, I was refuting your claim that it was just popularity. But the virgin birth is proof.No, you got it confused. Science is man's tool to understand the things that he does see; the things that he cannot see, however, are subject strictly to the individual man's reason and choice of belief. Science must ignore these things, and it does not make a decision on their existence, one way or the other. Anything else would not be science.
He did make an impact, but that is in no way proof of his divinity.
But there is no proof for the virgin birth.Well, those last statements weren't evidence of divinity, I was refuting your claim that it was just popularity. But the virgin birth is proof.
If I hit a loop, then I must be using circular logic. Upon realizing my mistake, I would correct accordingly the reasoning that brought me to this point.But back to God. Science defines things, provides proof for theories, or reasons for specific events. But if you keep tryig to define everything you find, if you keep trying to dig deeper behind each proof you find, you're going to either hit a loop or a dead end. Then what?
Again, I'll revert back to faith; believing in something you can not see. And even if Mary & Joseph lied about it, what would they have to gain (rhetorical)? Anyway, what I meant by the second part is a little hard to pin point exactly, but let me ask you this: What is the definition of "red" (yes, the color)?But there is no proof for the virgin birth.
If I hit a loop, then I must be using circular logic. Upon realizing my mistake, I would correct accordingly the reasoning that brought me to this point.
As for a "dead end," this is a vague term, and it could represent any number of things. For instance, it may represent a fact that we know universally to be true, in which case there is no problem. However, if you would like a better answer than this, you should clarify exactly what you mean.
But there must be evidence on which to base this faith. Otherwise, it is simply faith for the sake of faith itself.Again, I'll revert back to faith; believing in something you can not see.
Your question is rhetorical, but I shall answer it, nonetheless: Mary and Joseph had nothing to do with the invention or the perpetuation of the virgin birth myth. This was a concept propagated by the gospel writers, decades after the death of Jesus.And even if Mary & Joseph lied about it, what would they have to gain (rhetorical)?
Its definition, according to Wiktionary, is "Any of a range of colours having the longest wavelengths, 670nm, of the visible spectrum; a primary additive colour for transmitted light: the colour obtained by subtracting green and blue from white light using magenta and yellow filters."Anyway, what I meant by the second part is a little hard to pin point exactly, but let me ask you this: What is the definition of "red" (yes, the color)?
Of course, I do.That's good. Having a relationship with your father is one of the best things in life. Do you like the fact that he is part of your life?