• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is your threshold for gauging if a prophecy is delayed or has failed?

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
In your own orthodox Bible, it is written "when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word which the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously, you need not be afraid of him." Deu 18:22 (RSV)

At what point do you declare that an unfulfilled prophecy is only delayed, rather than that it is a failed prophecy?

I am reminded of prophecies such as "Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay every one for what he has done." Rev 22:12 (RSV), "So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away before all these things take place." Mark 13:29-30 (RSV), etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cloudyday2

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,876
9,490
Florida
✟376,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
In your own orthodox Bible, it is written "when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word which the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously, you need not be afraid of him." Deu 18:22 (RSV)

At what point do you declare that an unfulfilled prophecy is only delayed, rather than that it is a failed prophecy?

I am reminded of prophecies such as "Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay every one for what he has done." Rev 22:12 (RSV), "So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away before all these things take place." Mark 13:29-30 (RSV), etc.

Those things within that generation, see Matthew 24, Luke 21, etc., were prophecies of the end of the old covenant, and with it the destruction of the last Jewish temple. Those things occurred within that generation.

Going further there is the telling of the martyred saints living and reigning with Christ for a thousand years. Due to some of the interpretations of the time, the notion of a literal one thousand years was abolished by the Church in favor of an indeterminate time. The Nicene Creed was modified to reflect that teaching with the addition of "whose kingdom shall have no end".

There are many protestants nowadays who choose to apply those prophecies to some future time but that hasn't been a part of Christianity since the fourth century or so.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Not David
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
I am reminded of prophecies such as "Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay every one for what he has done." Rev 22:12 (RSV), "So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away before all these things take place." Mark 13:29-30 (RSV), etc.
Do you think therefore that God lied ? Heaven forbid! HE cannot lie.
His Word is Truth.
He Continuously Guards His Word and Watches Over His Word to Perform It, as written.
 
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
There are many protestants nowadays who choose to apply those prophecies to some future time but that hasn't been a part of Christianity since the fourth century or so.
"and he shall come again in glory to judge both the living and the dead" was how I recall the Nicene Creed. I suppose you are referring to some of the modern ideas about Revelation rather than the Second Coming itself?
 
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I imagine Bible-believing Christians can point to the Parable of the Ten Virgins. Whether the parable was an authentic saying of Jesus or something concocted by the early church to explain the delay is debated.
Then the Kingdom of Heaven will be like ten virgins, who took their lamps, and went out to meet the bridegroom. Five of them were foolish, and five were wise. Those who were foolish, when they took their lamps, took no oil with them, but the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps. Now while the bridegroom delayed, they all slumbered and slept. But at midnight there was a cry, "Behold! The bridegroom is coming! Come out to meet him!" Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps. The foolish said to the wise, "Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out." But the wise answered, saying, "What if there isn't enough for us and you? You go rather to those who sell, and buy for yourselves." While they went away to buy, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went in with him to the marriage feast, and the door was shut. Afterward the other virgins also came, saying, "Lord, Lord, open to us." But he answered, "Most certainly I tell you, I don't know you." Watch therefore, for you don't know the day nor the hour in which the Son of Man is coming.
Parable of the Ten Virgins - Wikipedia
 
Upvote 0

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,876
9,490
Florida
✟376,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
"and he shall come again in glory to judge both the living and the dead" was how I recall the Nicene Creed. I suppose you are referring to some of the modern ideas about Revelation rather than the Second Coming itself?

One translation of the Creed has it:

He will come again with glory
to judge the living and the dead.
His kingdom will never end.

That "his kingdom will never end" is the Church's repudiation of millenialism.
 
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I've been reading "The Resurrection" by Geza Vermes. The most common view on the afterlife today is that our soul departs our body and goes to heaven or hell immediately, but the more common view in the Second Temple period in Palestine was either no life after death or a general resurrection of body and soul together (roughly equivalent to "soul sleep"). The common view of the soul existing without the body in heaven immediately comes from Plato. That view also existed in the Second Temple among some Hellenized Jews.

So for non-Hellenized Palestinian Jews the Second Coming and general resurrection was essential to Christianity. Even Paul who was a somewhat Hellenized Jew seems to have expected to wait in the grave until the Second Coming. According to Paul the Christians were to be pitied if their belief in resurrection was wrong, and that meant that the promised future Second Coming was essential for Paul.

Most modern Christians don't believe in that type of resurrection, so the Second Coming has become more superfluous to their faith.
 
Upvote 0

cloudyday2

Generic Theist
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2012
7,381
2,352
✟591,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
One translation of the Creed has it:

He will come again with glory
to judge the living and the dead.
His kingdom will never end.

That "his kingdom will never end" is the Church's repudiation of millenialism.
Can you explain the distinction you see between your quote and my remembered quote and how that relates to millenialism? I suppose millenium is a thousand year reign on Earth after the Second Coming followed by another great event mentioned somewhere in Revelation?

EDIT: Sorry, now I see the distinction. Your quote includes the "and His Kingdom shall have no end" and mine stopped early. Got it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Most modern Christians don't believe in that type of resurrection, so the Second Coming has become more superfluous to their faith.
Don't listen to them.
=================================================
The common view of the soul existing without the body in heaven immediately comes from Plato. That view also existed in the Second Temple among some Hellenized Jews.
Don't listen to them. (the common view is not God's View nor His Word)
===================================================
So for non-Hellenized Palestinian Jews the Second Coming and general resurrection was essential to Christianity. Even Paul who was a somewhat Hellenized Jew seems to have expected to wait in the grave until the Second Coming. According to Paul the Christians were to be pitied if their belief in resurrection was wrong, and that meant that the promised future Second Coming was essential for Paul.
Good. You tested, so far a little, to see , apparently THIS is IN LINE with GOD'S WORD and PLAN.
Listen to God and His Word, yes !
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
Those things within that generation, see Matthew 24, Luke 21, etc., were prophecies of the end of the old covenant, and with it the destruction of the last Jewish temple. Those things occurred within that generation.

Going further there is the telling of the martyred saints living and reigning with Christ for a thousand years. Due to some of the interpretations of the time, the notion of a literal one thousand years was abolished by the Church in favor of an indeterminate time. The Nicene Creed was modified to reflect that teaching with the addition of "whose kingdom shall have no end".

There are many protestants nowadays who choose to apply those prophecies to some future time but that hasn't been a part of Christianity since the fourth century or so.
Where do you believe the "I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay every one for what he has done." come into play?
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
Do you think therefore that God lied ? Heaven forbid! HE cannot lie.
His Word is Truth.
He Continuously Guards His Word and Watches Over His Word to Perform It, as written.
I hold no such assumptions

What I do know is that there are some prophetic claims in this book, and I was wondering how its disciples handle "delayed" vs "failed" prophecies.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
I hold no such assumptions

What I do know is that there are some prophetic claims in this book, and I was wondering how its disciples handle "delayed" vs "failed" prophecies.
Look throughout Scripture and see if any prophecy ever failed or was delayed.
The faithful Ekklesia rejoiced and rejoice in His Word, TODAY. Today has enough troubles for itself. The things tomorrow are enough for tomorrow.
 
Upvote 0

Nihilist Virus

Infectious idea
Oct 24, 2015
4,940
1,251
41
California
✟156,979.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
In your own orthodox Bible, it is written "when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word which the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously, you need not be afraid of him." Deu 18:22 (RSV)

20 But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.

21 You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?”

22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.

If a prophecy does not come true, the prophet is to be put to death. So the notion of a far-future prophecy makes absolutely no sense in this context. If far-future prophecies are allowed, then any prophet sentenced to death for producing a failed prophecy will just claim it is a far-future prophecy, rendering this portion of scripture useless. If far-future prophecies are allowed, literally anyone could say anything as long as it is not in the name of a false god and as long as it is sufficiently vague, and absolutely no harm would come to them. This is partly why most prophecy is vague, but there are other contributing factors as well.

The purpose of prophecy:
1. A prophet makes a correct prediction of the future
2. This establishes that he has contact with God
3. He then relays messages from God

The actual purpose of a prophet is to relay messages from God. Prediction of the future is merely the means by which he establishes his credibility.

At what point do you declare that an unfulfilled prophecy is only delayed, rather than that it is a failed prophecy?

I am reminded of prophecies such as "Behold, I am coming soon, bringing my recompense, to repay every one for what he has done." Rev 22:12 (RSV), "So also, when you see these things taking place, you know that he is near, at the very gates. Truly, I say to you, this generation will not pass away before all these things take place." Mark 13:29-30 (RSV), etc.

Among the many things that indicate there is no divine plan in the Bible, we see the understanding of prophecy shift from the Old Testament to the New Testament. In the OT, prophecy is as I described. In the NT, suddenly we have prophecy from the OT being fulfilled...? So... we are to believe that a prophecy had gone for hundreds of years without being fulfilled, with the prophet being long dead and presumably considered to be a false prophet at least by some, and yet, in an era when literacy is extremely rare and books are prohibitively expensive, we have a book about a potentially false prophet being preserved and reproduced for hundreds of years? Some Christians actually pitch that idea, while others say that sometimes a prophecy might have an immediate and far-future aspect to it. They, of course, absolutely fail to establish this groundwork anywhere in the OT or even the NT. It's just assumed that the gospel authors knew they were taking things out of context, even though they don't acknowledge doing so.


Basically, Christians make claims they know they can't back up.

Jesus is real because he fulfilled countless prophecies from the Old Testament.

(After you take them down the road of facts...)

Well... ok, yes it's true that the NT writers took things out of context from the OT and applied them to the NT. But, see, there's a beautiful theme there, which I suppose ultimately proves nothing but I find it to be pleasing.

And then there's this one:

We can trust the gospel accounts because the eyewitnesses died and refused to recant.

(Another trip down the road of facts...)

Well... ok, we actually know of no one from history who was an eyewitness to the resurrection, and then was given the chance to recant and go free, but chose to die. It's not really until the second and third generation of Christians that we see them being given the chance to recant and go free. But the point is that there was persecution... here and there. Sporadically.
 
Upvote 0

Silmarien

Existentialist
Feb 24, 2017
4,337
5,254
39
New York
✟223,224.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I've been reading "The Resurrection" by Geza Vermes. The most common view on the afterlife today is that our soul departs our body and goes to heaven or hell immediately, but the more common view in the Second Temple period in Palestine was either no life after death or a general resurrection of body and soul together (roughly equivalent to "soul sleep"). The common view of the soul existing without the body in heaven immediately comes from Plato. That view also existed in the Second Temple among some Hellenized Jews.

So for non-Hellenized Palestinian Jews the Second Coming and general resurrection was essential to Christianity. Even Paul who was a somewhat Hellenized Jew seems to have expected to wait in the grave until the Second Coming. According to Paul the Christians were to be pitied if their belief in resurrection was wrong, and that meant that the promised future Second Coming was essential for Paul.

Most modern Christians don't believe in that type of resurrection, so the Second Coming has become more superfluous to their faith.

I think the focus on a disembodied soul is also related to the difficulties inherent in making sense of continuity of self from the current body to the resurrected body. It's like a premodern Star Trek problem: if I go into the transporter, get dematerialized and then rematerialized elsewhere, am I still me? Christian revelation of course says, "Yes, you are," but that leads to the question of how that can be the case. Enter the immaterial soul.

I don't know how that turned into people completely disregarding the resurrection of the body, though. That said, it's possible to simultaneously adhere to a general resurrection without caring too much about the Second Coming. Not completely orthodox, but I like John Polkinghorne's quantum take on it, where a cosmos made new might entail an entirely parallel universe. Obviously the laws of physics would need a complete overhaul for our own universe to be transfigured in the necessary way. Maybe it will be, or maybe it's already happened elsewhere. Who knows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
I imagine Bible-believing Christians can point to the Parable of the Ten Virgins. Whether the parable was an authentic saying of Jesus or something concocted by the early church to explain the delay is debated.

Parable of the Ten Virgins - Wikipedia
True ... it is convenient to dispel claims of "false prophecy" with "well, it just hasn't been fulfilled yet".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
Look throughout Scripture and see if any prophecy ever failed or was delayed.
The faithful Ekklesia rejoiced and rejoice in His Word, TODAY. Today has enough troubles for itself. The things tomorrow are enough for tomorrow.
I pointed out a few in my OP.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Do you think therefore that God lied ? Heaven forbid! HE cannot lie.
His Word is Truth.
He Continuously Guards His Word and Watches Over His Word to Perform It, as written.
Well, exactly. God cannot lie, so that Ben faced with Him saying something which would be called a lie if anyone else said it, Christians must believe there is another explanation.

The obvious explanation, that the Christian religion is wrong, cannot be contemplated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cloudyday2
Upvote 0