Okay watched all 14 parts last night, William Lane Craig was certainly one of the best or most intelligent Christian or theist apologist I've come across, however I remain unconvinced by his conclusions (as you'd probably expect from an atheist, but I try and keep an open mind!). I skipped most of Dacey's parts, so didn't hear his rebuttals, but will listen again at some point.
I think he makes a bit of a leap when he says the universe has an external transcendent personal cause. I just don't see how we can know the nature of the cause of the universe yet, and much less attribute it to a God.
The fine tuning of the universe or the initial conditions of the big bang are to support life are so precise that it defies human comprehension. I'm not sure how true that is, but assuming it is, how do we know we're not just one of a countless amount of universes, we just happen to be in the one that can support life.
I've already said what I think of him with regards to objective morality. I don't believe objective morality exists, so therefore I can't agree with him on this premise.
I did like the fact that Craig wasn't an apologist who makes you want to pull your hair out for once, so credit to him for that! In the Q&A he does realise that we would be living in a deterministic world, but he thinks our soul gives us freewill if I heard him correctly. That maybe so, but we have no knowledge of a soul, so I'd still say we live in a deterministic world.
Good debate though, might watch it again at the weekend, as I don't think I took everything he said in, and wouldn't mind listening to what Darcey has to say.