The same with Jesus it does not contain The FATHER's name and was not writen as Jesus when
originally Writen.
ok, i get where you are comming from now- if i had just seen it sooner.
You are one to say that Messiah's name MUST CONTAIN the name.
I believe that Messiahs name did and still does contain the name.
Question though, if this is how you base the ONESESS of Hashem, by the name, then how do you make his Ruach one because in fact he actually has no name- You can assume his name- but you cannot tell me what His name actually is, can you?
So again, how do you make HaShems oneness, Or do you believe that Messiah is not Hashem at all, nor is his Ruach?
ok, now you see that Messiah need come in the Name.
This however isnt really a big thing.
IF YOU UNDERSTOOD hebrew and TN"K correctly in this portion there were a few men named either YeHoshuah or Yeshua (like the high priest)
Joshua was indeed a sign man in telling who the messiah was, the same with many Israelis were to be signs for mashiach, and Yeshua and zerrubabel were also signs, however, if i remember correctly, zecharyah told the high priest that his name(the high preists name, which is Yeshua) is the branch, and that both zerrubabel and the high priest are sign men of the Branch of david.
this is a very very very short detail about it- but you should get the jist.
No matter what you believe right now- THIS IS written.
What you are doing is getting into some very old things bro.
I'll ask you this, without the vowel pronounciations existing how do you know that the pronounciation was ever YAH/IAH to begin with.
you might say the greek, however, isnt this a pagan language- trying to associate everything, even the saviors name to a pagan diety?
So if the NAME of Messiah which contained Hashems name was blasphemed, why wouldnt they have done it to Hashems name itself, since Messiahs name already contains it and they desecrated that one?
On the other hand, what if the greeks were correct in renderring the name in the way we see it now (Iaoue)
and here comes jews to make a name for Hoshea, joshua and yeshua.
see, by the time that emperor constantine and his false church of the romans and alexandria could go out to destroy copies of the NT, there would already be 200 yrs worth (which still isnt all that much as to what we can produce in 200 months) of scribal writting being distibuted and shared amoungst the synagogues of Messiah in the diaspora for one and amoungst the nations.
so no doubt, in these we would still have a copy of the name of messiah in its "original" in greek, pronounced as iasoua/iasoue as you give it.
truth is, i would love to be on an expedition to find this- if it actually exists.
oh yeah and yes yeshu, and yehshua contains the name
shalom u'bracha