Nothing new here. Of course ICR uses disproven data, any evidence that supports creation science is wrong and been has disproven because evolution is a proven theory, just like gravity. People have different colour hair, eyes and skin. Have you heard of mutations. Animals born with two heads, or without any eyes. Its hard to survive when you have a mutation, and you usually die which proves survival of the fittest. Like, what more evidence could you possibly want that we were once pond slime.
Anyway, even if there is correct evidence that supports creation science, it is wrong because most of the evidence supports evolution. So you see, we have wrong evidence and right evidence. Only right evidence is allowed.
By the way, don't get hung up trying to get a theory on Creation out of the fundies. You won't. The only thing they can do is quote what the Bible teaches about Creation. We all know that is wrong because evolution is right. They think that since God was the only one alive when the world was created, and He created the world, He was the only one who is entitled to give an accurate account of what actually happened. Evolutionists know different. Remember Darwin, he wrote the bible on evolution. He sailed around in a wooden boat and watched finches and things. He noticed finches have different beaks. Furthermore, those beak shapes sometimes change. A bit like a dog that moults when the weather changes. Its a genetic thing, and when your genes change, that is evolution. Darwin noticed this, so he must have been very clever. Most scientists say he was. He said we evolved, and if a great scientist says we evolved, then we must have.
You see, scientists have what they call peer reviews. Most of them don't believe in God and have come up with other theories to explain how we came to be. Peer reviews are a good way from stopping the Christian nutters from presenting any bad evidence in the Scientific journals. Incidently, the scientific journals all agree that we evolved. How many articles have you seen written by Christian scientists in these journals. Obviously they don't have the evidence. So you can see that science is self correcting. Science is wonderful, science is reliable, and if science says we evolved we must have.
If science says we evolved, then forget what the Bible says about Creation. If the Bible is right, and it plainly says that God created the earth in six days then its just a matter of interpretation. You have to interpret the Bible so that it agrees with science, because if the Bible disagrees with science and you say God is right, you are implying that God knows more than science.
I hope this gives you some help as you try to work out how the fundies think, and why they are wrong.
After much reserach I find it quite difficult to find a definitive Theory of Creationism, which is based upon objective information that led them to find information which appears to be similar to the Creation story in Genesis.
