- Dec 20, 2009
- 30,260
- 8,538
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Married
What is the rock being referred to in Matthew 16:18?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As I was saying, the wording just doesn't support the alternate theories.Foundation of Christ?
The Rock is Jesus Christ of Nazareth who is the "Chief Cornerstone". Peter and all of the 11 are the foundation. Be blessed.What is the rock being referred to in Matthew 16:18?
(I agree)The ROCK is described in the previous verses where Jesus asks the Apostles, who do they say that He is. The only correct answer came from Peter where Jesus then said right, the truth only comes from God and not the opinions of man. Upon that truth (that truth only comes from God) will the foundation the church be built upon. Then gentiles came along and reversed it.
The ROCK is described in the previous verses where Jesus asks the Apostles, who do they say that He is. The only correct answer came from Peter where Jesus then said right, the truth only comes from God and not the opinions of man. Upon that truth (that truth only comes from God) will the foundation the church be built upon. Then gentiles came along and reversed it.
The "rock" (actually small stone) IS NOT described by reference to the founding of a new church or to a new religion's "foundation."
What is the rock being referred to in Matthew 16:18?
(good answer)Th rock is, in one sense, the truth of the good confession that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. That is, the rock is Christ. Nonetheless, it is also the confession itself, as well as Peter who was the first to confess. He names Simon, Peter, as the first to confess the truth. So the rock is all three with the ultimate foundation being Christ, who can only be revealed by the Father, as was done to Peter. I think to try and say it was one of the three, to the exclusion of the others, misses the point.
Yes. Tradition is often mistaken for reality. Look at the Christmas tradition of three wise men at the stable. Scripture says no such thing.That the revelation comes only from God, tends to throw a monkey wrench in tradition based structures. Any group around for 200 years or more starts to take on a traditionalized structure because it is inhabited and managed by humans.
Peter was the pebble (being a man) but the fact the truth only comes from God (as Jesus always said if it were not true i would have told you) and not from the opinions of man, became the cornerstone (rock) of His church. As I said, the later gentiles had a different idea and made it all about man's opinions. Of course with the truth being in scripture and the coming scattering of Judah, it was necessary to turn scripture over to those who would use it for their own purposes, as that was the only way scripture would survive until present day, safely hidden in plain sight in the hands of the enemy.The "rock" (actually small stone) IS NOT described by reference to the founding of a new church or to a new religion's "foundation." That is such a stretch! And it's visually impossible anyway. Who makes the foundation of a building out of a pile of gravel or broken pieces?
(good answer)
My general standard for this topic is that the foundation of God's kingdom needs to be eternal so as long as it meets that criteria, I don't have an issue with the answer.
Which is why I kind of take an issue with Peter the man being an answer.
Yeah, I don't get the Peter doctrine, but it's a popular conclusion.The foundation being eternal makes sense.
In terms of the reference being solely about Peter, it doesn't fit what we see in Acts 15. It is not Peter who is head of the church, but James, the brother of Jesus. Peter is at the council, and functions as a witness but not as head of the assembly.
Peter got thrown into the mix when the gentiles struggling for power came up with apostolic succession and linked Peter to Rome as if Rome was somehow the cradle of Christianity.It is not Peter who is head of the church, but James, the brother of Jesus. Peter is at the council, and functions as a witness but not as head of the assembly.