Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I said life was evidence, but it is evidence that only those with spiritual eyes can see.
The evidence is that God exists, and you refuse to seek Him.
There is no evidence I can give you.
Post #435Here is exactly what you said......
You claimed that there is evidence that your god exists. Now you say....
Which one is the truthful statement?
You don't even believe in God, yet you claim some authority in this matter?
Post #435
"Life is evidence of God. If you were of the truth you would believe it."
I said there is no evidence I can give you because you wouldn't believe it.
Don't flatter yourself. Your words do not jut, though they are very irritating and make it difficult for me to communicate with you. I am well used to hate mail from the Bible Belt. The problem I have is that neither it nor you really challenge me in any real way. I hate to say it, but this does get boring. I'll say something and the you will cast aspersion on my character, and so on, and so on. Nobody likes to be insulted, but I am well used to this sort of thin coming from the right wing. What I really need is someone to provide me with a real challenge, provide some sort of solid rational rebuttals to what I have to say.Someone is either true or they are not. That is not attacking his character, but his beliefs. You think everyone is true?
Everything I say is an attack, apparently. My words hurt, don't they? I'll spare you all, then.
Post #435
"Life is evidence of God. If you were of the truth you would believe it."
I said there is no evidence I can give you because you wouldn't believe it.
Thank you for proving that you do not have a theology degree.
David was a young man when he killed Goliath. Samuel 21 comes much later, while he is king. Here is what is ACTUALLY HAPPENING in Samuel 21.
18 In the course of time, there was another battle with the Philistines, at Gob. At that time Sibbekai the Hushathite killed Saph, one of the descendants of Rapha.
19 In another battle with the Philistines at Gob, Elhanan son of Jair the Bethlehemite killed the brother of Goliath the Gittite, who had a spear with a shaft like a weaver’s rod.
20 In still another battle, which took place at Gath, there was a huge man with six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot—twenty-four in all. He also was descended from Rapha. 21 When he taunted Israel, Jonathan son of Shimeah, David’s brother, killed him.
22 These four were descendants of Rapha in Gath, and they fell at the hands of David and his men.
Thanks for playing, but you lose.
Alright, I'm done offering the Bible as a truth for my claims. I understand that my effort was futile, and I'll admit that you've all won this debate in some respects, as I was a fool for getting into it as I did. Truth is still truth, but I digress.
How about you now gather all the evidence you have and prove that God doesn't exist and that if He does He, for some reason or another, chose to let us evolve.
The evidence is that God exists, and you refuse to seek Him. You will die in your rebellion if you don't repent and turn to Jesus Christ.
Alright, I'm done offering the Bible as a truth for my claims. I understand that my effort was futile, and I'll admit that you've all won this debate in some respects, as I was a fool for getting into it as I did. Truth is still truth, but I digress.
How about you now gather all the evidence you have and prove that God doesn't exist and that if He does He, for some reason or another, chose to let us evolve.
Well, the design present in even the smallest forms of life is a clear evidence that we have a designer of some sort. So, the burden of proof is on you to prove that life and our planet have no designer.You don't seem to understand that if you claim a God exists the burden of proof is upon you. Atheists merely point out the fact that sufficient evidence for a god of any sort is lacking and therefore there is no need of such a being.
Pixies are legends; God is creator. God is Holy, and God is real. You just deny it.
Atheism is the unsupported claim that there is no God, yet you believe it, do you not?
Well, the design present in even the smallest forms of life is a clear evidence that we have a designer of some sort. So, the burden of proof is on you to prove that life and our planet have no designer.
No, it isn't. Perhaps it would be wise to ask an actual atheist what he believes. Just a helpful hint for you.
Well, the design present in even the smallest forms of life is a clear evidence that we have a designer of some sort. So, the burden of proof is on you to prove that life and our planet have no designer.
-_- dude, it's partly our fault that dogs generally aren't as smart as wolves, seeing as we bred them to obey, not to think for themselves.You are smarter than your dog. That is the evidence.
Look, I'm no biologist, but it doesn't take much explaining to see that life at the very least looks designed. DNA is a language of sorts, and isn't language a form of intelligence? Dawkins' book The Blind Watchmaker is based on the idea that everything looks designed but somehow isn't. Can you prove that we aren't designed in any way: that there is this blind watchmaker you call evolution?No, the burden is still all yours. Present the evidence that our life is 'designed'.
I won't add to Mr Zone, but perhaps YOU can gather all the evidence to show why Odin and Vishnu don't exist.
And when you've finished with them, I have about 1000 more.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?