What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?

[dlamberth]

I'll play this game because I don't expect any flood advocates to.

The basalt came after the flood.

Here in the Northwest we have 300 separate Columbia River basalt flows. We also have glaciers from the Ice Age. All of that is suppose to have happen right after the flood, right? It boggles the mind in how that all happens AND at the same time leaves no physical evidence of a Global Flood. It just doesn't add up.

 

[AV1611VET]

We also have glaciers from the Ice Age.

Psalm 147:15 He sendeth forth his commandment upon earth: his word runneth very swiftly.
16 He giveth snow like wool: he scattereth the hoarfrost like ashes.
17 He casteth forth his ice like morsels: who can stand before his cold?

 

[Bradskii]

Away.

Ah. I never thought of that.

 

[AV1611VET]

Ah. I never thought of that.

Did it occur to you that they went back into space, from whence they were called?

Genesis 7:11b ... and the windows of heaven were opened.
12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

Remember: they used to reside on the Earth, before God created the landmass, but were called into space for some future reason.

Genesis 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

 

[TLK Valentine]

The one you teach your students, when you them the Bible.

When I teach them the Bible, I do it in the context of world literature and/or comparative mythology.

 

[Bradskii]

Did it occur to you that they went back into space, from whence they were called?

Genesis 7:11b ... and the windows of heaven were opened.
12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

Remember: they used to reside on the Earth, before God created the landmass, but were called into space for some future reason.

Genesis 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

Is it still there?

 

[AV1611VET]

When I teach them the Bible, I do it in the context of world literature and/or comparative mythology.

So then ask your students what Flood I'm referring to.

 

[AV1611VET]

Is it still there?

Is it still where?

It was created on the earth, moved to possibly the moon or Mars, came back during the Flood, and could now very well be on Neptune, with "floaties" in it.

You know ... dead bodies, dead plants, rocks and such.

Serving as a warning buoy for other fallen angels who might want to pay us a visit.

 

[Bradskii]

Is it still where?

It was created on the earth, moved to possibly the moon or Mars, came back during the Flood, and could now very well be on Neptune, with "floaties" in it.

Well, can't argue with that...

And I mean that literally. It's impossible to argue against it. Which kinda makes it worthless (see Mr. Popper for confirmation of that).

 

[TLK Valentine]

So then ask your students what Flood I'm referring to.

I assumed you meant a real one.

 

[AV1611VET]

Well, can't argue with that...

And I mean that literally. It's impossible to argue against it. Which kinda makes it worthless (see Mr. Popper for confirmation of that).

Mr Popper must have been one doosey of a person to get to know.

I wonder how argumentative he was?

He probably argued, just for the sake of arguing.

 

[AV1611VET]

I assumed you meant a real one.

I'll bet you did.

 

[Job 33:6]

Here in the Northwest we have 300 separate Columbia River basalt flows. We also have glaciers from the Ice Age. All of that is suppose to have happen right after the flood, right? It boggles the mind in how that all happens AND at the same time leaves no physical evidence of a Global Flood. It just doesn't add up.

Yea, I suppose you've got me! Throws in towel*.

 

[Bradskii]

Mr Popper must have been one doosey of a person to get to know.

I wonder how argumentative he was?

He probably argued, just for the sake of arguing.

He wouldn't have entertained an argument with you. For the reasons already explained.

 

[AV1611VET]

He wouldn't have entertained an argument with you. For the reasons already explained.

Smart man then.

He knew when to quit, didn't he?

Sounds like he would have never made it past Genesis 1 with me, let alone Genesis 6-9.

 

[dlamberth]

Yea, I suppose you've got me! Throws in towel*.

That was easy.

 

[VirOptimus]

That's a double-edged sword.
If the text isn't clear enough, then you can't use it emphatically either.

I dont use it at all.

 

[Shemjaza]

No, the problem is they never had a skeleton, just isolated bones. Mixed with many species, including human bones. Habilis was established as a taxon based on extremely scanty evidence. A few finger bones, a deformed jawbone and a few skull fragments, found scattered over a large area. And they initially misidentified monkey bones as part of a hand.
"Homo habilis is an empty taxon inadvertently proposed and should be formally sunk." ( Paleoanthropologist Loring Bruce)

So more lies then?

No evidence of Homo habilis being found with human remains.

They don't have complete skeletons, but the thing about evidence and analysis is that you can study multiple animals and multiple species to learn about how the work.

The remains of habilis we have show us that it was a primate, but differently formed from a human or an australopithecus.

Do you have the context of the quote? If it's actually from an expert I assume it's exactly the kind of internal disagreement where they don't dispute that the remains are that of a transitional primate, but don't think habilss shouls be defined as a distinct species.

 

[AV1611VET]

No evidence of Homo habilis being found with human remains.

That doesn't surprise me, as they would have been sequestered from the rest of the population, as were those who had leprosy.

 

[Mr Laurier]

I don't need a biologist to tell me the difference between an ape and a human.

So what is the difference?

Just look at an ape: strong, hairy, no reading and writing skills, limited domiciles.

So just like any human hunter gatherer who lacks an education. Plus "limited domiciles"? What is that?
What is "limited domiciles"?
If the only thing you have to distinguish humans from apes is education, then you have a problem.

No. Actually they aren't.

Look closely. Look very closely. You are covered with fine hair.