Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The go live on Themyscira, LOL.I'm not sure, but I'm hoping that it involves cute magical girl warriors fighting for love and justice.
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out the major holes in the philosophy. A large percentage of honest physicist will tell you this. Many are clinging on to this philosophy like the Egyptians and Romans did to theirs.Never heard of him. Who is he?
--- googling --- googling --- googling ---
Oh my! A creationist zoologist. No evidence in his bio he knows squat about astrophysics.
Right, I was hoping that you would be able to point to something more simple like an article published in a journal. You see, as I remember it, in 1991 the age of the earth was already believed to be those 4.5/4.6B years."The Age of the Earth" by Brent Dalrymple is a good starter. It was written in '91, and we have more/better methods now, but it gives a good synopsis about how the estimates got better over the years. I believe he developed the K/Ar and/or Ar/Ar methods.
I think you posted something likeYou can address the question asked. Which referenced gravitational effects. Is it not apparent that those effects will cause rotational effects in any moving mass?
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out the major holes in the philosophy. A large percentage of honest physicist will tell you this. Many are clinging on to this philosophy like the Egyptians and Romans did to theirs.
Also the CMB isn’t proof, it actually was completely off of what it predicted. CMB could very well also be from another phenomenon unknown to us. It doesn’t even match what the models predicted it would be measured.
Hm, ok I appreciate that you try to save the model that I have thrown a serious blow at. I respect when people try to think about things. So I will try to go a little distance with your thought.No. The Solar system did not form from a rotating supernova. Supernovae are expanding, the early solar system was collapsing.
How do small patches of the universe start to rotate? Easy. Start with any non-rotating uniform gas and inject a non-rotating disturbance (for example a jet of gas puffed into it. Alternatively you could think of a person walking in a straight line into a uniform block of air). When the intruding gas pushes the larger medium aside it starts to rotate. With one rotation sense on one side and the other on the opposite side. The net angular momentum is still zero, but there are now localized pockets of rotation.
This happens all the time with fluid-fluid interactions forming localized pockets of rotation. In a large molecular cloud there will be many randomly oriented pockets of low-level rotation that lead to the randomly oriented star systems when they collapse.
If I may be allowed to pass on this topic. I understand that maybe the verse "God stretches out the heavens"Stretching out the heavens, or the raqia, should not be conflated with stretching space time. The raqia was a solid dome perception of the authors of the ancient near east:
Let's look at some more verses on the raqia:
And God said, “Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.”
Genesis 1:6 NRSV
God made the expanse, and separated the waters which were below the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse; and it was so. God called the expanse heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.
Genesis 1:7-8 NASB1995
And God said, “Let there be lights in the dome of the sky to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years,
Genesis 1:14 NRSV
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened.
Genesis 7:11 NRSV
the fountains of the deep and the windows of the heavens were closed, the rain from the heavens was restrained,
Genesis 8:2 NRSV
And God said, “Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the dome of the sky.”
Genesis 1:20 NRSV
And he dreamed that there was a ladder set up on the earth, the top of it reaching to heaven; and the angels of God were ascending and descending on it. And the Lord stood beside him [or stood above it] and said, “I am the Lord, the God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and to your offspring;
Genesis 28:12-13 NRSV
and they saw the God of Israel. Under his feet there was something like a pavement of sapphire stone, like the very heaven for clearness.
Exodus 24:10 NRSV
Can you, like him, spread out the skies, hard as a molten mirror?
Job 37:18 NRSV
Hast thou with him spread out the sky, Which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?
Job 37:18 KJV
can you join him in spreading out the skies, hard as a mirror of cast bronze?
Job 37:18 NIV
It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to live in;
Isaiah 40:22 NRSV
Over the heads of the living creatures there was something like a dome, shining like crystal, spread out above their heads.
Ezekiel 1:22 NRSV
And above the dome over their heads there was something like a throne, in appearance like sapphire; and seated above the likeness of a throne was something that seemed like a human form.
Ezekiel 1:26 NRSV
Then I looked, and above the dome that was over the heads of the cherubim there appeared above them something like a sapphire, in form resembling a throne.
Ezekiel 10:1 NRSV
When He established the heavens, I was there, When He inscribed a circle on the face of the deep, When He made firm the skies above, When the springs of the deep became fixed, When He set for the sea its boundary So that the water would not transgress His command, When He marked out the foundations of the earth;
Proverbs 8:27-29 NASB1995
The sky vanished like a scroll rolling itself up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.
Revelation 6:14 NRSV
Also note that God "stretched" the heaven (past tense) as well.If I may be allowed to pass on this topic. I understand that maybe the verse "God stretches out the heavens"
(which seems to be in many places - click)
could be taken to be a part of a biblical cosmology, and maybe you are well versed in the topic more than I, I simply wanted to make the point that that expression resounds with an expanding universe.
Also note that God "stretched" the heaven (past tense) as well.
Jeremiah 51:15 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heaven by his understanding.
Well, the way I see it is like taking a balloon and blowing it up to about two feet in diameter with smoke.... well, apparently, God still has the power to continue "stretching" the heavens (present tense, with caveats for any pockets of space-time variations that may be existing ... ).
Well, the way I see it is like taking a balloon and blowing it up to about two feet in diameter with smoke.
Then suddenly "ballooning" out the balloon to a distance of ten miles in diameter.
The smoke (universe) will expand into the larger area until it reaches maximum disbursement.
Thus the smoke was both stretched out (to two feet) in the first place, and is also stretching out (towards maximum disbursement).
So both tenses apply: past tense and present tense.
I love talking about the Creation Week.Sounds like we're in essential agreement, minus our selected choices of "scientific models." But I usually just let all of that stuff ride since I'm not a stickler where dogma about the origin and/or the nature of our universe is concerned.
It makes some discussions go a whole lot easier.
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out the major holes in the philosophy. A large percentage of honest physicist will tell you this. Many are clinging on to this philosophy like the Egyptians and Romans did to theirs.
First of all it is against forum rules to post videos without providing a summary of its relevancy to the thread.You got any evidence for your accusations? You’re the one that started with the exact accusations.
I gave you a series which the first video of the series talks about the entire Big Bang pseudoscience philosophy.
Here it is again, the direct video explaining. Since it seems you glanced at my comment:
Says the one that has only assumptions of the evidence for deep time.More to the point is no creationist has even one datum
point to disprove evolution / deep time, or to fortify
their faith based beliefs.
So it is actually impossible to be an intellectually honest yec.
Since this is sciencey and on-topic I will reply to it...
The temperature of the CMB doesn't have a specific value for all possible BB cosmologies. The current, observable CMB temperature is related to how much expansion has occurred since the Recombination epoch as the original, unredshifted temperature of the background radiation is basically set by the atomic physics of hydrogen. The redshift to recombination is dependent on the expansion history of the universe and through it things like if the Universe was flat, the ratio of matter to non-matter, etc. T_CMB = T_Rec/(1+z) and z~1100. The guesses based on BB models that were within a factor of 2-3 were perfectly fine.
It is the *existence* of the CMB, *not* the exact value that is the prediction of general BB models. The exact temperature is very useful in constraining the parameters of the BB model.
If you think there are "alternative mechanisms" for forming the CMB you should spell them out.
I thought you come across more as the kick ass type female which I encountered plenty of times when doing martial arts.That's me right there.
Not an agnostic who believes in Creationism. An agnostic who believes in intelligent design.
I'd call him a Theist, except he doesn't believe we can know a god exists. He insists the evidence necessitates some design (without going so far as personifying a designer).
In other words, scientific facts about our world are best explained by the theory there is an intelligence behind the universe. He stops there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?