• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

what is the evidence that universe is 13.7B years old?

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,154
52,650
Guam
✟5,148,712.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm not sure, but I'm hoping that it involves cute magical girl warriors fighting for love and justice.
The go live on Themyscira, LOL.

But don't bring Themyscira here.

They're called "miracles," not "magic," as academia teaches.
 
Upvote 0

Andre_b

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2020
512
104
44
Ottawa
✟33,857.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Never heard of him. Who is he?

--- googling --- googling --- googling ---

Oh my! A creationist zoologist. No evidence in his bio he knows squat about astrophysics.
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out the major holes in the philosophy. A large percentage of honest physicist will tell you this. Many are clinging on to this philosophy like the Egyptians and Romans did to theirs.
 
Upvote 0

PeterDona

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2010
743
181
Denmark
✟393,615.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Right, I was hoping that you would be able to point to something more simple like an article published in a journal. You see, as I remember it, in 1991 the age of the earth was already believed to be those 4.5/4.6B years.
I was hoping for that one reference or those few references.

What I told my students was that somebody had found a stone that was half uranium and half lead. That was probably just a made up story no my part.
 
Upvote 0

PeterDona

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2010
743
181
Denmark
✟393,615.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
You can address the question asked. Which referenced gravitational effects. Is it not apparent that those effects will cause rotational effects in any moving mass?
I think you posted something like
"you have heard of gravity?"
If
{you do not see such a statement as simply throwing such a hard insult that the discussion cannot continue}
then I cannot help you

For me, for 2 people to interact, there has to be some preparatory conditions, like you trust the uprightness of the other person, that the other person is able to conduct reasonable argumentation etc.

Your statement starts by claiming you do not believe such things about me. Then we can not communicate. And being the OP'er that somehow has to stay in the thread, I resort to reporting your post. That's it.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,160
16,664
55
USA
✟419,926.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out the major holes in the philosophy. A large percentage of honest physicist will tell you this. Many are clinging on to this philosophy like the Egyptians and Romans did to theirs.

What philosophy are you speaking of?

As for the physicists, have you bothered to ask us?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,160
16,664
55
USA
✟419,926.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Also the CMB isn’t proof, it actually was completely off of what it predicted. CMB could very well also be from another phenomenon unknown to us. It doesn’t even match what the models predicted it would be measured.

Since this is sciencey and on-topic I will reply to it...

The temperature of the CMB doesn't have a specific value for all possible BB cosmologies. The current, observable CMB temperature is related to how much expansion has occurred since the Recombination epoch as the original, unredshifted temperature of the background radiation is basically set by the atomic physics of hydrogen. The redshift to recombination is dependent on the expansion history of the universe and through it things like if the Universe was flat, the ratio of matter to non-matter, etc. T_CMB = T_Rec/(1+z) and z~1100. The guesses based on BB models that were within a factor of 2-3 were perfectly fine.

It is the *existence* of the CMB, *not* the exact value that is the prediction of general BB models. The exact temperature is very useful in constraining the parameters of the BB model.

If you think there are "alternative mechanisms" for forming the CMB you should spell them out.
 
Upvote 0

PeterDona

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2010
743
181
Denmark
✟393,615.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Hm, ok I appreciate that you try to save the model that I have thrown a serious blow at. I respect when people try to think about things. So I will try to go a little distance with your thought.

So ehm, ok I can think of 2 maybe 3 points that I want to make about your assertion. Hopefully I can inspire thinking.
(1) while I agree to your idea that a "disturbance" could produce rotation in a gas or liquid, do we know what could be the nature of such a disturbance? Could we be able to independently verify that such an impulse / a disturbance has occured.
(2) Based on preservation of rotational / angular momentum, when a rotating system is created by a purely natural "disturbance", there would have to be something that has an equal rotation in opposite direction.
For easiness of thought, let us speculate that there should be a solar system just like ours, but simply rotating the other way. Where would we find that counter-rotating object?
(3) This may be a question coming from my lack of knowing fluid dynamics, but I want to make the point that "space" is not the same reference system as e.g. a liquid in a sea on earth. There is nothing in space to yield a resistence so to speak, so I just wonder about the whole idea, how effective would an impulse really be at creating that rotation.

I am also hoping you will be able to understand and assess my thoughts here.
 
Upvote 0

PeterDona

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2010
743
181
Denmark
✟393,615.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
If I may be allowed to pass on this topic. I understand that maybe the verse "God stretches out the heavens"
(which seems to be in many places - click)
could be taken to be a part of a biblical cosmology, and maybe you are well versed in the topic more than I, I simply wanted to make the point that that expression resounds with an expanding universe.
 
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,154
52,650
Guam
✟5,148,712.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Also note that God "stretched" the heaven (past tense) as well.

Jeremiah 51:15 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heaven by his understanding.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Feel'n the Burn of Philosophy!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,929
11,668
Space Mountain!
✟1,377,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Also note that God "stretched" the heaven (past tense) as well.

Jeremiah 51:15 He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heaven by his understanding.

... well, apparently, God still has the power to continue "stretching" the heavens (present tense, with caveats for any pockets of space-time variations that may be existing ... ).
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,154
52,650
Guam
✟5,148,712.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
... well, apparently, God still has the power to continue "stretching" the heavens (present tense, with caveats for any pockets of space-time variations that may be existing ... ).
Well, the way I see it is like taking a balloon and blowing it up to about two feet in diameter with smoke.

Then suddenly "ballooning" out the balloon to a distance of ten miles in diameter.

The smoke (universe) will expand into the larger area until it reaches maximum disbursement.

Thus the smoke was both stretched out (to two feet) in the first place, and is also stretching out (towards maximum disbursement).

So both tenses apply: past tense and present tense.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Feel'n the Burn of Philosophy!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,929
11,668
Space Mountain!
✟1,377,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Sounds like we're in essential agreement, minus our selected choices of "scientific models." But I usually just let all of that stuff ride since I'm not a stickler where dogma about the origin and/or the nature of our universe is concerned.

It makes some discussions go a whole lot easier.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,154
52,650
Guam
✟5,148,712.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I love talking about the Creation Week.

It's my forte, you know.
 
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,696
40
Hong Kong
✟188,696.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out the major holes in the philosophy. A large percentage of honest physicist will tell you this. Many are clinging on to this philosophy like the Egyptians and Romans did to theirs.

More to the point is no creationist has even one datum
point to disprove evolution / deep time, or to fortify
their faith based beliefs.

So it is actually impossible to be an intellectually honest yec.
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,826
4,723
✟352,468.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
First of all it is against forum rules to post videos without providing a summary of its relevancy to the thread.
No one is expected to wade through a video that runs for nearly 1.5 hours for the answers.

I did however find the references to the Big Bang and this Walter Veith character quotes the Bible on a regular basis as compensation for willful ignorance of the science.
Rather than rebutting every single point in the video that doesn’t make sense, since the subject of angular momentum has raised its head again, this time in the video, this issue will be addressed.

As mentioned in the thread the Big Bang does not determine how objects orbit or spin in space-time and Veith’s account is nonsensical.
According to Veith a plausible explanation is the rotation and orbits of objects in space is due to the rotation of the infinitesimal point when the Big Bang occurred.
Since this point must have spun in a certain direction, objects which spin or orbit in a retrograde motion must prove the Big Bang is wrong!!!
What is laughable about this argument the science is demonstrably wrong which he uses to show how the Big Bang is wrong.
Unfortunately two wrongs don’t make a right.

Firstly as anyone who has a command of basic physics understands angular momentum is conserved.
If the radius r of an object or its orbit decreases, its angular velocity ω increases.
Slowly rotating massive stars which undergo a type II supernova through gravitational collapse end up as fast spinning neutron stars of much smaller radius due to conservation of angular momentum.
The limit when an object becomes a point as r → 0, results in ω → ∞.
In the case for the universe if we ran it backwards, ω becomes infinitely large when the universe is a point size at the Big Bang.
It is therefore nonsense to talk about points of infinitesimal size having an angular momentum.

Secondly at sizes below the Planck length the physics breakdown so it is pointless (pardon the pun) to even talk about angular momentum at the time of the Big Bang.
Veith is clearly a crank who is also conspiracy theorist and accused of being anti-Semitic.
Walter Veith - Wikipedia

You should have done some research on the author and the subject matter before concluding the video shows the Big Bang as a “pseudoscience philosophy.”
 
Upvote 0

Andre_b

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2020
512
104
44
Ottawa
✟33,857.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
More to the point is no creationist has even one datum
point to disprove evolution / deep time, or to fortify
their faith based beliefs.

So it is actually impossible to be an intellectually honest yec.
Says the one that has only assumptions of the evidence for deep time.

Again doesn’t take a genius to figure out the multiple holes in the philosophy
 
Upvote 0

PeterDona

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2010
743
181
Denmark
✟393,615.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate


Is it possible you could in some easy words explain some of this CMB connection.

i do understand that when a theory is able to make predictions that then later prove to be factual, that shows that the theory is a strong theory.
I also heard that the CMB is not uniform. This may be off topic however.

thanks
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,370
16,029
72
Bondi
✟378,549.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

ID isn't a theory. It makes no predictions and it can't be tested. And please, just please don't tell us that there is no designer implied. Such nonsense insults my intelligence.

Method A: Gather facts, propose a theory to explain them, draw a conclusion.
Method B: Start with a conclusion, make up a theory which leads to that conclusion, look for facts that fit the theory.

One of those is science. One is ID. Do I need to tell you which is which?
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0