- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,221
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
As I said, that's according to science's classification system. But, they are the same kind (with variations).
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As I said, that's according to science's classification system. But, they are the same kind (with variations).So that's a case of evolution from one species to another. They obviously came from the same genetic ancestor, the original equine, and then horses and donkeys evolved over time.
Ergo macroevolution.
As I said, that's according to science's classification system. But, they are the same kind (with variations).
No, its a variation of one kind.Using the broadest definition of Kind.
But it's still speciation, one species to another.
As I said, that's according to science's classification system. But, they are the same kind (with variations).
No, its a variation of one kind.
As I said, that's according to science's classification system. But, they are the same kind (with variations).
You speak of kind, but ask a scientific question. Science makes its ownHow many pairs of chromosomes did the original Equus "kind" have?
You speak of kind, but ask a scientific question. Science makes its own
quandaries, it needs to answer them. Animals of the same kind can breed, its really not that complicated.
According to science's classification system, but its the same kind.Speciation. The horse, Equus Ferus Caballus, is a different species to the donkey, Equus Africanus Asinus.
According to science's classification system, but its the same kind.
Why can't we use science to investigate your Biblical claims?
Do you think a species is a kind?But it's a different species. Speciation, thus macroevolution.
You can quibble over it all you want, but it's still an example of speciation.
Do you think a species is a kind?
You speak of kind, but ask a scientific question. Science makes its own
quandaries, it needs to answer them. Animals of the same kind can breed, its really not that complicated.
According to science's classification system, but its the same kind.
Species is a science-made term; Kind is a biblical term. Kind and species are not necessarily the same. You keep asking what a kind is and I’ve given my answer, but what is a species? It’s my understanding there is not a clear-cut answer for it, or at least one without a gray area. But, that didn't matter, kinds do not change and that was a problem for science and macroevolutionists, even before Darwin put it into words.I don't believe that Kind is a meaningful term to use in biology.
Because their parents could breed 'according to their kind.'How do you know?
Species is a science-made term; Kind is a biblical term. Kind and species are not necessarily the same. You keep asking what a kind is and I’ve given my answer, but what is a species? It’s my understanding there is not a clear-cut answer for it, or at least one without a gray area. But, that didn't matter, kinds do not change and that was a problem for science and macroevolutionists, even before Darwin put it into words.
Well, they're probably grilled about it from a scientific perspective and who knows where that can go. But the bible is quite clear and repetitive that all things are to reproduce according to their kind. To me, that is obvious that the requirement for kind is that the parents can breed. If they can't, they are different kinds.Except that it really isn't a problem since no two Creationists can agree on what a Kind is.
Do bats and birds breed?As a point in fact, the Bible refers to bats and birds as both Kinds, flying Kind, when we know that is demonstrably wrong since bats and birds are two different beings all together.
Offspring is the same kind, whether it is fertile or not has nothing to do with it.I've only asked what a Kind is twice, and I've been asking you to clarify what it is with the horse example. Which, I will admit, you actually have done, since you personally equate Kind to mean the Family of a species (Equine in the horse example), but your standard for why speciation and macroevolution doesn't apply to it is what I'm contentious about. Horses and donkeys are two separate species. They can interbreed, yes, but their offspring (both hinny's and mules) is more often than not sterile.
Well, they're probably grilled about it from a scientific perspective and who knows where that can go. But the bible is quite clear and repetitive that all things are to reproduce according to their kind. To me, that is obvious that the requirement for kind is that the parents can breed. If they can't, they are different kinds.
Do bats and birds breed?
Offspring is the same kind, whether it is fertile or not has nothing to do with it.
As a point in fact, the Bible refers to bats and birds as both Kinds, flying Kind, when we know that is demonstrably wrong since bats and birds are two different beings all together.
Not with each other. Mammals and birds cannot breed with each other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?