EmSw
White Horse Rider
- Apr 26, 2014
- 6,434
- 718
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- NO this text is about people who have fallen away, NOT salvation. you PRESUME the list describes people who are "fully saved", yet the writer has not really said they were saved. so this is your extracted presumption.
- read #218
- "salvation can be lost" ?, your sect dont even teach you totally have it already so why bother.
- "pope can fall" ? he did fall yesterday in poland during his mass.
Here is verse 1 of chapter 6 of Hebrews -
Therefore, leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God,
And of course, the 'therefore' is referring back to previous words. Let's see what they are, shall we?
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food.
13 For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe.
14 But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is,those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil. (Hebrews 5)
I ask, is verse one speaking of believers or unbelievers? Can unbelievers go on to perfection?
Should unbelievers be teachers in the church? Are unbelievers babes 'in Christ'?
Therefore (referring to what I previously wrote), this is very much about salvation, about those who are already saved.
You refer to 'fully saved'; is there 'partially saved'? If so, is a 'partially saved' person saved? Does he need to do something else to be 'fully saved'? Does a 'partially saved' person escape hell? Does a 'partially saved' person belong to Jesus and have life within them?
Upvote
0