This response seems to give the impression that if one were to look in that sticky post one would discover what is the official Adventist position on what a revival is. After all, this is what we are discussing in this thread and it to this our posts are being addressed.PaleHorse said:
But one cannot divine what 'revival' means to Adventists by reading that sticky.PaleHorse said:
The post wasn't pointed to anyone but you. It certainly wasn't for Willo's edification for he seems to be right on target and has a good handle on what the Bible teaches. Either you do or you don't know what revival means to an Adventist. If you're Adventist you know the answer and all this diatribe is without point.statrei said:
I will take this as your way of admitting that your suggestion that looking in the sticky thread would clarify what the church believes a revival is was completely unfounded. As to the word 'diatribe,' I have no idea what place it has in this discourse.PaleHorse said:
When did the difference between an abbreviation and an acronym become an issue here? The issue that has been addressed by the church is what constitutes the correct abbreviation of the name Seventh-day Adventist. That's all.PaleHorse said:
