• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is it about forgiveness?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tofferer

LCMS - Lutherie
Nov 15, 2004
3,579
172
50
Lakewood WA
Visit site
✟27,097.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
yes, but that completely ignores the "seven times in one day" saying "I repent" bit. have ye anything to say about that?
Forgiveness is an act of love and as such, we forgive regardless of whether it is one time or a thousand times. Look at all that God has forgiven you through the death and resurrection of Christ Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

LilLamb219

The Lamb is gone
Site Supporter
Jun 2, 2005
28,055
1,929
Visit site
✟106,096.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
yes, but that completely ignores the "seven times in one day" saying "I repent" bit. have ye anything to say about that?

Repentance does not "earn" forgiveness. We can forgive someone even if he/she does not repent, but we don't have to share that forgiveness with him/her until we see signs of repentance...but forgiveness can still come first.

At the cross, our sins were forgiven before we were even born! It didn't have to wait for our repentance as repentance is itself a gift from God. It is the bridge between Law and Gospel.
 
Upvote 0

DaRev

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
15,117
716
✟19,002.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
So, then, God chose to not give them that gift, if they have not repented, and since he chose not to give them that gift, they will perish (except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish)

right?

Wrong. It isn't that God didn't give them the gift. They rejected God's gift.

Our salvation is all God's doing. We can do nothing toward our salvation.

Our damnation is all our own doing. God does nothing toward our damnation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilLamb219
Upvote 0

Tofferer

LCMS - Lutherie
Nov 15, 2004
3,579
172
50
Lakewood WA
Visit site
✟27,097.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Wrong. It isn't that God didn't give them the gift. They rejected God's gift.

Our salvation is all God's doing. We can do nothing toward our salvation.

Our damnation is all our own doing. God does nothing toward our damnation.
Many conservative ministers in several denominations would likely agree to that. We are more than capable of condemning ourselves and are generally quite eager to do so along with everyone else. It is only by God's grace that we can be saved from condemnation. However, understand that this is by faith and that faith is a gift from God.
 
Upvote 0

LilLamb219

The Lamb is gone
Site Supporter
Jun 2, 2005
28,055
1,929
Visit site
✟106,096.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Wrong. It isn't that God didn't give them the gift. They rejected God's gift.

Our salvation is all God's doing. We can do nothing toward our salvation.

Our damnation is all our own doing. God does nothing toward our damnation.

Spoken like a true Lutheran! :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

walloffire

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2007
703
0
✟970.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
But didn't they only reject God's gift because God did not draw them to him?

Joh 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

and also:

Joh 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Joh 6:66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

seems as though Jesus is specifically saying that the Father did not draw those people to Jesus. He could have chosen to draw them to him, but he did not
 
Upvote 0

DaRev

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
15,117
716
✟19,002.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
But didn't they only reject God's gift because God did not draw them to him?

Joh 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

and also:

Joh 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Joh 6:66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

seems as though Jesus is specifically saying that the Father did not draw those people to Jesus. He could have chosen to draw them to him, but he did not

The "drawing to Him" is the gift. It is given to all. Those who reject it do not have the forgiveness and salvation. It is not God's work that people are damned, it is their own acts that damn them. You are arguing for double predestination, which the Scriptures do not at all support.
 
Upvote 0

Tofferer

LCMS - Lutherie
Nov 15, 2004
3,579
172
50
Lakewood WA
Visit site
✟27,097.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The closest thing to any form of double predestination is that the redeemed are granted eternity with Christ and the reprobate are cast eternally into Hell. However, that may border more towards equal ultimacy than predestination. Of couse I still have much to learn, so if DaRev corrects me, I am more than willing to learn.
 
Upvote 0

walloffire

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2007
703
0
✟970.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
> It is not God's work that people are damned

Pharaoh was predestined unto destruction, as was Judas. If the saved are predestined (proved true), and there are only 2 groups of people, then the damned must be predestined to go to their own place as well. God hardened Pharaoh's heart.

Exo 9:16 And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth.

Exo 14:17 And I, behold, I will harden the hearts of the Egyptians, and they shall follow them: and I will get me honour upon Pharaoh, and upon all his host, upon his chariots, and upon his horsemen.
Exo 14:18 And the Egyptians shall know that I am the LORD, when I have gotten me honour upon Pharaoh, upon his chariots, and upon his horsemen.

Sounds like God had it in for them from the get-go, the very same God that sent his son to die for us hardened the hearts of the Egyptians and had predestined them unto destruction. So how then can you say there is no "double predestination" when the story of Israel being led out of Egypt tells a vastly opposite story?
 
Upvote 0

walloffire

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2007
703
0
✟970.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Or what of Esau and Jacob? Jacob he loved, Esau he hated.

Mal 1:2 I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob,
Mal 1:3 And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.
 
Upvote 0

filosofer

Senior Veteran
Feb 8, 2002
4,752
290
Visit site
✟6,913.00
Faith
Lutheran
[FONT= "Book Antiqua"]
And when you look at both examples as referenced by Paul in Romans 9, there is what appears to be a subtle, but significant difference. When someone is saved, God is the active agent (9:23 "in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand [active verb] for glory"), when someone is condemned, the person is responsible (9:22 "What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared [middle/passive form of verb] for destruction")


filo

Blessed to be a blessing
Forgiven to be forgiving
[/font]
 
Upvote 0

RadMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2007
3,580
288
79
Missouri
✟5,227.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
[FONT="Book Antiqua"]
And when you look at both examples as referenced by Paul in Romans 9, there is what appears to be a subtle, but significant difference. When someone is saved, God is the active agent (9:23 "in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand [active verb] for glory"), when someone is condemned, the person is responsible (9:22 "What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared [middle/passive form of verb] for destruction")


filo

Blessed to be a blessing
Forgiven to be forgiving
[/FONT]
Wow---the Holy Spirit really leads you.
 
Upvote 0

BakaFidelis

God's Faithful Fool - A Living Martyr
Oct 28, 2007
621
35
Saginaw, Michigan
✟23,441.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
But didn't they only reject God's gift because God did not draw them to him?

Joh 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

and also:

Joh 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Joh 6:66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.


seems as though Jesus is specifically saying that the Father did not draw those people to Jesus. He could have chosen to draw them to him, but he did not



Those passages are entirely correct, however it seems as though you are not seeing the entire picture. God DID draw those people to Him. They were disciples and followers of Jesus. He didn't say to them to go. They left Him through their own decisions, insecurities and worries. God wishes everyone to be saved, but knows that not everyone will be.

Take the sower of seeds parable.

(NIV)
Mathew 13:
18. "Listen then to what the parable of the sower means:
19. When anyone hears the message about the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart. This is the seed sown along the path.
20. The one who received the seed that fell on rocky places is the man who hears the word and at once receives it with joy.
21. But since he has no root, he lasts only a short time. When trouble or persecution comes because of the word, he quickly falls away.
22. The one who received the seed that fell among the thorns is the man who hears the word, but the worries of this life and the deceitfulness of wealth choke it, making it unfruitful.
23. But the one who received the seed that fell on good soil is the man who hears the word and understands it. He produces a crop, yielding a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown."

> It is not God's work that people are damned

Pharaoh was predestined unto destruction, as was Judas. If the saved are predestined (proved true), and there are only 2 groups of people, then the damned must be predestined to go to their own place as well. God hardened Pharaoh's heart.

Exo 9:16 And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth.

Exo 14:17 And I, behold, I will harden the hearts of the Egyptians, and they shall follow them: and I will get me honour upon Pharaoh, and upon all his host, upon his chariots, and upon his horsemen.
Exo 14:18 And the Egyptians shall know that I am the LORD, when I have gotten me honour upon Pharaoh, upon his chariots, and upon his horsemen.

Sounds like God had it in for them from the get-go, the very same God that sent his son to die for us hardened the hearts of the Egyptians and had predestined them unto destruction. So how then can you say there is no "double predestination" when the story of Israel being led out of Egypt tells a vastly opposite story?

Neither were pre-destined, but chose not to hear God.

This is one of the places where the translations don't do accurate justice I am afraid.

In Exodus 14:17 the word "chazaq" is used. This word is more used with strength/retraint, capture, and conquering. Was God "hardening" their hearts. Yes, with the word choice I would think it is in the way one conquers a foe. By then the Egyptians had already declared themselves enemies of God.

(NIV)Exodus 8:15. But when Pharaoh saw that there was relief, he hardened his heart and would not listen to Moses and Aaron, just as the LORD had said.

In the above passage, the word "kabad" was used, which denotes a negative troubling or being made heavy; a burden if you will.

(NIV)Exodus 4: 21. The LORD said to Moses, "When you return to Egypt, see that you perform before Pharaoh all the wonders I have given you the power to do. But I will harden his heart so that he will not let the people go.

Again "chazaq" is used. God is promising that their hearts will be defeated.

And as you look throughout the remaining passages about Pharaoh's heart being hardened, it will always be after he was presented with the Word of God. The hardening or conquering or however you prefer to refer to it as, did not happen BEFORE God gave His message but after, meaning that God gave him the opportunity for believe. Upon refusing, he was reaffirming his state as an enemy of God.

Or what of Esau and Jacob? Jacob he loved, Esau he hated.

Mal 1:2 I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob,
Mal 1:3 And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.



God hates sin. Esau continually showed despisement toward God with his actions and unrepentance. Also, it was common at that time to use a person's name to describe their descendants. Like Israel (Jacob). Esau's descendants stood against God, so yes, He would turn away from them.

2 Timothy 2:12. if we endure, we will also reign with him. If we disown him, he will also disown us;
 
Upvote 0

filosofer

Senior Veteran
Feb 8, 2002
4,752
290
Visit site
✟6,913.00
Faith
Lutheran
[FONT= "Book Antiqua"]
The word choice of harden/make strong does change throughout the Exodus/plagues account, as noted above (I can provide even more detail from a study I did a few years ago).


The critical factor in this discussion is that Pharaoh hardens his heart after the first five plagues, only then does God harden his heart.
[/font]
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.