Rev Wayne
Simplicity + Sincerity = Serenity
Lynn,
I'm not really familiar with Crowley, and so can't speak to that issue myself. I do find it strange that after posting for eight months on an antimasonic website where the floor is wide open for all things masonic and/or antimasonic, Crowley's name never once came up. And believe me, if he had truly been a Mason, if anybody in the world would have been all over it, it would be those guys. The silence on Crowley, as those at the E-511 site would say, "is telling." My sources tell me that he was not a Mason, though he made the claim. He claimed the title of "Grand Inspector General," a title of administrative rank and not degree. Since links have purportedly not been allowed, I shall see if quotes from the article shall be allowed. The writer is Matt D.A. Fletcheran, from 1994:
Wayne
I'm not really familiar with Crowley, and so can't speak to that issue myself. I do find it strange that after posting for eight months on an antimasonic website where the floor is wide open for all things masonic and/or antimasonic, Crowley's name never once came up. And believe me, if he had truly been a Mason, if anybody in the world would have been all over it, it would be those guys. The silence on Crowley, as those at the E-511 site would say, "is telling." My sources tell me that he was not a Mason, though he made the claim. He claimed the title of "Grand Inspector General," a title of administrative rank and not degree. Since links have purportedly not been allowed, I shall see if quotes from the article shall be allowed. The writer is Matt D.A. Fletcheran, from 1994:
The article sums up with the following paragraph:The 33° is styled Sovereign Grand Inspector-General and is sparingly conferred by the Supreme Councils of the recognised jurisdictions. There does not appear to be any record of this conferment other than his claim made in The Confessions of Aleister Crowley.
As for Pike, it seems to make a difference when quoting small portions of what he says as opposed to reading the pages-long discourses he tends to engage in. For instance, I have seen the often-quoted piece from him declaring Freemasonry to be a religion; but I have seen much less frequently this quote from him:The United Grand Lodge of England does not recognize Crowley as a member of the Craft. All his affiliations were with irregular bodies, and so they deny him recognition.
I suppose you and I, were we to continue, could go on in this same pattern ad infinitum. But with other circumstances that demand my attention at present, I for one will be content to simply "agree to disagree," hopefully to the benefit of each of us toward faithful use of our time. God's blessings and peace be with you."Masonry is not a religion. He who makes of it a religious belief, falsifies and denaturalizes it. The Brahmin, the Jew, the Mahometan, the Catholic, the Protestant, each professing his peculiar religion, sanctioned by the laws, by time, and by climate, must needs retain it, and cannot have two religions"--Morals & Dogma, p. 161
Wayne

Upvote
0